577 research outputs found
Heliospheric Magnetic Field 1835-2009
We use recently acquired geomagnetic archival data to extend our long-term
reconstruction of the HMF strength. The 1835-2009 HMF series is based on an
updated and substantiated IDV series from 1872-onwards and on Bartels'
extension, by proxy, of his u-series from 1835-1871. The new IDV series, termed
IDV09, has excellent agreement (R^2 = 0.98; RMS = 0.3 nT) with the earlier
IDV05 series, and also with the negative component of Love's extended (to 1905)
Dst series (R^2 = 0.91). Of greatest importance to the community, in an area of
research that has been contentious, comparison of the extended HMF series with
other recent reconstructions of solar wind B for the last ~100 years yields a
strong consensus between series based on geomagnetic data. Differences exist
from ~1900-1910 but they are far smaller than the previous disagreement for
this key interval of low solar wind B values which closely resembles current
solar activity. Equally encouraging, a discrepancy with an HMF reconstruction
based on 10Be data for the first half of the 20th century has largely been
removed by a revised 10Be-based reconstruction published after we submitted
this paper, although a remaining discrepancy for the years ~1885-1905 will need
to be resolved
Geomagnetic Semiannual Variation Is Not Overestimated and Is Not an Artifact of Systematic Solar Hemispheric Asymmetry
Mursula et al. [2011] (MTL11) suggest that there is a 22-year variation in
solar wind activity that coupled with the variation in heliographic latitude of
the Earth during the year, gives rise to an apparent semiannual variation of
geomagnetic activity in averages obtained over several solar cycles. They
conclude that the observed semiannual variation is seriously overestimated and
is largely an artifact of this inferred 22-year variation. We show: (1) that
there is no systematically alternating annual variation of geomagnetic activity
or of the solar driver, changing with the polarity of the solar polar fields,
(2) that the universal time variation of geomagnetic activity at all times have
the characteristic imprint of the equinoctial hypothesis rather than that of
the axial hypothesis required by the suggestion of MTL11, and (3) that the
semiannual variation is not an artifact, is not overestimated, and does not
need revision.Comment: Submitted to GR
Errors in Scale Values for Magnetic Elements for Helsinki
Using several lines of evidence we show that the scale values of the
geomagnetic variometers operating in Helsinki in the 19th century were not
constant throughout the years of operation 1844-1897. Specifically, the adopted
scale value of the Horizontal Force variometer appears to be too low by ~30%
during the years 1866-1874.5 and the adopted scale value of the Declination
variometer appears to be too low by a factor of ~2 during the interval
1885.8-1887.5. Reconstructing the Heliospheric Magnetic Field strength from
geomagnetic data has reached a stage where a reliable reconstruction is
possible using even just a single geomagnetic data set of hourly or daily
values. Before such reconstructions can be accepted as reliable, the underlying
data must be calibrated correctly. It is thus mandatory that the Helsinki data
be corrected. Such correction has been satisfactorily carried out and the HMF
strength is now well constrained back to 1845
Does Building a Relative Sunspot Number Make Sense? A Qualified 'Yes'
Recent research has demonstrated that the number of sunspots per group
('active region') has been decreasing over the last two or three solar cycles
and that the classical Relative Sunspot Number (SSN) no longer is a good
representation of solar magnetic activity such as revealed by e.g. the F10.7 cm
microwave flux. The SSN is derived under the assumption that the number of
spots per group is constant (in fact, nominally equal to 10). When this is no
longer the case (the ratio is approaching 5, only half of its nominal value)
the question arises how to construct a sunspot number series that takes that
into account. We propose to harmonize the SSN with the sunspot Group Count that
has been shown to follow F10.7 very well, but also to include the day-to-day
variations of the spot count in order to preserve both long-term and short-term
variability.Comment: 4 pages, 1 Figur
- …