Interaction effect of parent-adolescent attachment and multiple life events on mental health.

<p>Interaction effect of parent-adolescent attachment and multiple life events on mental health.</p

General characteristics for the total study population at baseline and by mental health at follow-up (N = 3181).

a<p>The three groups with different number of life events differed significantly from each other, with the no life event group displaying the least mental health problems (10.4%) and the multiple life events group showing the highest rate of mental health problems (30.3%).</p

Interaction effect of parent-adolescent attachment and life events on mental health (N = 3181).

<p>Analyses included confounders: age, sex, ethnicity and education level.</p>1<p>The reference group is no life event.</p

Bivariate and multivariate associations of life events and parent-adolescent attachment with mental health problems (N = 3181).

1<p>Bivariate and multivariate analyses included confounders: age, sex, ethnicity and education level.</p>*<p>p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p <0.001.</p><p>Note: Bold numbers indicate significant <i>P</i>-values.</p

Additional file 1: of Psychometric properties of self-sufficiency assessment tools in adolescents in vocational education

Polyserial correlations between each domain of self-sufficiency and the total score on SSM-D, and between each domain and the total score on the self-report questionnaire, were assessed. (DOCX 12 kb

Associations of bullying victimization and suicidal ideation (N = 3181).

<p><i>Note</i>: OR  =  odds ratio; CI  =  confidence interval.</p>a<p>Similar results were obtained when age was included as a continuous variable in the analysis.</p><p>Model 1 is adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and bulling victimization. Suicidal ideation is the dependent variable.</p><p>Model 2 is the same as Model 1, but also adjusted for suicidal ideation at baseline.</p><p>Model 3a is the same as Model 2, but also includes a Gender × Traditional bullying victimization interaction term.</p><p>Model 3b is the same as Model 2, but also includes a Gender × Cyber bullying victimization interaction term.</p

Associations of bullying victimization and mental health problems (N = 3181).

<p><i>Note</i>: OR  =  odds ratio; CI  =  confidence interval.</p>a<p>Similar results were obtained when age was included as a continuous variable in the analysis.</p><p>Model 1 is adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and bulling victimization. Mental health problems is the dependent variable.</p><p>Model 2 is the same as Model 1, but also adjusted for mental health problems at baseline.</p><p>Model 3a is the same as Model 2, but also includes a Gender × Traditional bullying victimization interaction term.</p><p>Model 3b is the same as Model 2, but also includes a Gender × Cyber bullying victimization interaction term.</p

General characteristics of the total study population, and by gender (N = 3181).

<p>General characteristics of the total study population, and by gender (N = 3181).</p

Differences between boys/girls who did and did not participate at follow-up (N = 8271).

<p>Differences between boys/girls who did and did not participate at follow-up (N = 8271).</p