7 research outputs found

    Neue Planungsgrundlagen für erneuerbare Energien: Herausforderungen und Lösungsvorschläge

    Get PDF
    Nach dem am 1. Februar 2023 in Kraft getretenen Windenergieflächenbedarfsgesetz (WindBG) müssen bis 2032 2% der Fläche Deutschlands für die Produktion von Windenergie bereitgestellt werden. Das Gesetz legt dabei Flächenbeitragswerte für die Länder fest, die in den Flächenländern zwischen 1,8% und 2,2% der jeweiligen Landesfläche liegen. Auch wenn die weitgehenden Änderungen des Planungsrechts im Sinne der Energiewende zu begrüßen sind, stellt die Implementierung des 2-%-Flächenziels bei der Windenergie für die Planungsträger eine große Herausforderung dar. In den 12 Ländern, in denen es die Ebene der Regionalplanung gibt, wurde diese mit der Umsetzung beauftragt. Sie muss in den meisten Planungsregionen deutlich mehr Flächen als bisher ausweisen. Dabei ist sie auf die Zuarbeit anderer Institutionen angewiesen, um rechtssicher planen zu können. Wo die Flächenziele nicht erreicht werden, drohen rechtliche Sanktionen. Das vorliegende Positionspapier stellt auf Basis der Diskussionen im Ad-hoc-Arbeitskreis "Windenergie an Land" der ARL zentrale Thesen vor, die jeweils argumentativ unterlegt die Umsetzung des "2%- Zieles" und die Optimierung des Planungsprozesses unterstützen sollen.According to the "Windenergieflächenbedarfsgesetz" (WindBG), which came into force on February 1, 2023, 2% of Germany's territory must be made available for production of wind energy by 2032. The law sets out area contribution values for the federal states, which are between 1.8% and 2.2% of the respective state's area. The fundamental changes to planning law are certainly to be commended in the interests of the energy transition. However, the implementation of the 2% area target for wind energy is a great challenge for the planning authorities. In the 12 federal states where a regional planning level is established, regional planning has to implement the goals. In most planning regions, significantly more areas need to be designated than in the past. To be able to plan with confidence, the planning authorities are reliant on the input of other institutions. Where the area targets are not met, there is a threat of legal sanctions. This position paper presents central theses based on the discussions in the ARL ad hoc working group "Windenergie an Land", which are aimed at supporting the implementation of the "2% target" and the optimization of the planning process by providing arguments

    The role of detectability in the evolution of avian-dispersed fruit color

    No full text
    If the primary function of avian-dispersed fruit coloration were the maximization of detectability, then the commonest avian-dispersed fruit colors should be the ones most detectable to birds. We tested this prediction by photographing 63 fruit species primarily dispersed by birds, in situ in Sweden and Australia, with a multispectral camera closely mimicking the predominant spectral sensitivities of birds, including both UVS and VS (peak ultraviolet sensitivity ∼370 and 409 nm respectively) visual systems. Fruits were classified into nine distinct color categories based on different patterns of cone excitations, and were named by combining human color names with fruits’ UV reflective properties. For example, a bluish-UV fruit would be a fruit that excited the avian UV cone the most, but that also strongly excited the blue cone. Color and achromatic contrasts were calculated between each fruit color and common background objects, and compared to the relative abundance of the different fruit colors. Although red was highly detectable and the commonest color, the second and third commonest colors, purplish-UV and bluish-UV (often termed “black” by humans), were the least detectable. Although these latter two colors were more detectable to UVS than to VS birds, they were the least detectable to both visual systems. Rare fruit colors, such as UVish-purple, pink, and orange, were highly detectable to both visual systems. The lack of correlation between fruit color abundance and detectability suggests that the maximization of detectability has not been the primary driving force behind the evolution of fruit color

    Risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy in late preterm and term singleton births in a large California birth cohort

    No full text
    ObjectiveThe objective was to investigate maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with neonatal encephalopathy (NE).Study designWe queried an administrative birth cohort from California between 2011 and 2017 to determine the association between each factor and NE with and without hypothermia treatment.ResultsFrom 3 million infants born at 35 or more weeks of gestation, 6,857 cases of NE were identified (2.3 per 1000 births), 888 (13%) received therapeutic hypothermia. Risk factors for NE were stronger among cases receiving hypothermia therapy. Substance-related diagnosis, preexisting diabetes, preeclampsia, and any maternal infection were associated with a two-fold increase in risk. Maternal overweight/obesity, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, depression, gestational diabetes or hypertension, and short or long gestations also predicted NE. Young maternal age, Asian race and Hispanic ethnicity, and cannabis-related diagnosis lowered risk of NE.ConclusionsBy disseminating these results, we encourage further interrogation of these perinatal factors

    Neue Planungsgrundlagen für erneuerbare Energien: Herausforderungen und Lösungsvorschläge

    No full text
    Nach dem am 1. Februar 2023 in Kraft getretenen Windenergieflächenbedarfsgesetz (WindBG) müssen bis 2032 2% der Fläche Deutschlands für die Produktion von Windenergie bereitgestellt werden. Das Gesetz legt dabei Flächenbeitragswerte für die Länder fest, die in den Flächenländern zwischen 1,8% und 2,2% der jeweiligen Landesfläche liegen. Auch wenn die weitgehenden Änderungen des Planungsrechts im Sinne der Energiewende zu begrüßen sind, stellt die Implementierung des 2-%-Flächenziels bei der Windenergie für die Planungsträger eine große Herausforderung dar. In den 12 Ländern, in denen es die Ebene der Regionalplanung gibt, wurde diese mit der Umsetzung beauftragt. Sie muss in den meisten Planungsregionen deutlich mehr Flächen als bisher ausweisen. Dabei ist sie auf die Zuarbeit anderer Institutionen angewiesen, um rechtssicher planen zu können. Wo die Flächenziele nicht erreicht werden, drohen rechtliche Sanktionen. Das vorliegende Positionspapier stellt auf Basis der Diskussionen im Ad-hoc-Arbeitskreis "Windenergie an Land" der ARL zentrale Thesen vor, die jeweils argumentativ unterlegt die Umsetzung des "2%- Zieles" und die Optimierung des Planungsprozesses unterstützen sollen.According to the "Windenergieflächenbedarfsgesetz" (WindBG), which came into force on February 1, 2023, 2% of Germany's territory must be made available for production of wind energy by 2032. The law sets out area contribution values for the federal states, which are between 1.8% and 2.2% of the respective state's area. The fundamental changes to planning law are certainly to be commended in the interests of the energy transition. However, the implementation of the 2% area target for wind energy is a great challenge for the planning authorities. In the 12 federal states where a regional planning level is established, regional planning has to implement the goals. In most planning regions, significantly more areas need to be designated than in the past. To be able to plan with confidence, the planning authorities are reliant on the input of other institutions. Where the area targets are not met, there is a threat of legal sanctions. This position paper presents central theses based on the discussions in the ARL ad hoc working group "Windenergie an Land", which are aimed at supporting the implementation of the "2% target" and the optimization of the planning process by providing arguments
    corecore