DataSheet1_A global spatial-temporal land use regression model for nitrogen dioxide air pollution.docx

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recently revised its health guidelines for Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) air pollution, reducing the annual mean NO2 level to 10 μg/m3 (5.3 ppb) and the 24-h mean to 25 μg/m3 (13.3 ppb). NO2 is a pollutant of global concern, but it is also a criteria air pollutant that varies spatiotemporally at fine resolutions due to its relatively short lifetime (~hours). Current models have limited ability to capture both temporal and spatial NO2 variation and none are available with global coverage. Land use regression (LUR) models that incorporate timevarying predictors (e.g., meteorology and satellite NO2 measures) and land use characteristics (e.g., road density, emission sources) have significant potential to address this need.Methods: We created a daily Land use regression model with 50 × 50 m2 spatial resolution using 5.7 million daily air monitor averages collected from 8,250 monitor locations.Results: In cross-validation, the model captured 47%, 59%, and 63% of daily, monthly, and annual global NO2 variation. Daily, monthly, and annual root mean square error were 6.8, 5.0, and 4.4 ppb and absolute bias were 46%, 30%, and 21%, respectively. The final model has 11 variables, including road density and built environments with fine (30 m or less) spatial resolution and meteorological and satellite data with daily temporal resolution. Major roads and satellite-based estimates of NO2 were consistently the strongest predictors of NO2 measurements in all regions.Discussion: Daily model estimates from 2005–2019 are available and can be used for global risk assessments and health studies, particularly in countries without NO2 monitoring.</p

The geographic distribution and economic value of climate change-related ozone health impacts in the United States in 2030

<div><p>In this United States-focused analysis we use outputs from two general circulation models (GCMs) driven by different greenhouse gas forcing scenarios as inputs to regional climate and chemical transport models to investigate potential changes in near-term U.S. air quality due to climate change. We conduct multiyear simulations to account for interannual variability and characterize the near-term influence of a changing climate on tropospheric ozone-related health impacts near the year 2030, which is a policy-relevant time frame that is subject to fewer uncertainties than other approaches employed in the literature. We adopt a 2030 emissions inventory that accounts for fully implementing anthropogenic emissions controls required by federal, state, and/or local policies, which is projected to strongly influence future ozone levels. We quantify a comprehensive suite of ozone-related mortality and morbidity impacts including emergency department visits, hospital admissions, acute respiratory symptoms, and lost school days, and estimate the economic value of these impacts. Both GCMs project average daily maximum temperature to increase by 1–4°C and 1–5 ppb increases in daily 8-hr maximum ozone at 2030, though each climate scenario produces ozone levels that vary greatly over space and time. We estimate tens to thousands of additional ozone-related premature deaths and illnesses per year for these two scenarios and calculate an economic burden of these health outcomes of hundreds of millions to tens of billions of U.S. dollars (2010$).</p><p><i>Implications</i>: Near-term changes to the climate have the potential to greatly affect ground-level ozone. Using a 2030 emission inventory with regional climate fields downscaled from two general circulation models, we project mean temperature increases of 1 to 4°C and climate-driven mean daily 8-hr maximum ozone increases of 1–5 ppb, though each climate scenario produces ozone levels that vary significantly over space and time. These increased ozone levels are estimated to result in tens to thousands of ozone-related premature deaths and illnesses per year and an economic burden of hundreds of millions to tens of billions of U.S. dollars (2010$).</p></div