2 research outputs found
The living infinite: Envisioning futures for transformed human-nature relationships on the high seas
We find ourselves at a critical crossroads for the future governance of the high seas, but the perceived remoteness of the global ocean creates a psychological barrier for people to engage with it. Given challenges of overexploitation, inequitable access and other sustainability and equity concerns, current ocean governance mechanisms are not fit-for-purpose. This decade offers opportunities for direct impact on ocean governance, however, triggering a global transformation on how we use and protect the half of our planet requires a concerted effort that is guided by shared values and principles across regions and sectors. The aim of the series of workshops outlined in this paper, was to undertake a futures thinking process that could use the Nature Futures Framework as a mechanism to bring more transformative energy into how humans conceptualise the high seas and therefore how we aim to govern the ocean. We found that engaging with the future through science fiction narratives allowed a more radical appreciation of what could be and infusing science with artistic elements can inspire audiences beyond academia. Thus, creative endeavours of co-production that promote and encourage imagination to address current challenges should be considered as important tools in the science-policy interface, also as a way to elicit empathetic responses. This workshop series was a first, and hopefully promising, step towards generating a more creative praxis in how we imagine and then act for a better future for the high seas
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency
Neither breast cancer prevention and early-detection programs, nor their
outcomes, are uniform across Europe. This article describes the
rationale, methods, and process for development of the European
Commission ( EC) Initiative on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Guidelines. To be consistent with standards set by the Institute of
Medicine and others, the EC followed 6 general principles. First, the EC
selected, via an open call, a panel with broad representation of areas
of expertise. Second, it ensured that all recommendations were supported
by systematic reviews. Third, the EC separately considered important
subgroups of women, included patient advocates in the guidelines
development group, and focused on good communication to inform women's
decisions. Fourth, EC rules on conflicts of interest were followed and
the GRADE ( Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and
Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the
process and minimize the influence of competing interests. Fifth, it
focused its recommendations on outcomes that matter to women, and
certainty of the evidence is rated for each. Sixth, the EC elicited
stakeholder feedback to ensure that the recommendations remain up to
date and relevant to practice. This article describes the approach and
highlights ways of disseminating and adapting the recommendations both
within and outside Europe, using innovative information technology
tools