Sengketa Pembiayaan Akad Murabahah: Analisis Komparasi

This study aims to analyze comparation of the South Jakarta Religious Court in deciding cases no. 1957/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS and no. 407/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JS. This research based on normative legal, known as doctrinal legal research. The approaches used in this study were the statute approach, case approach and comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that the two decisions are based on legal considerations by the judge by referring to legal arguments and related laws. The judge granted the plaintiff's request in decision no. 1957/Pdt.G/2018/Pa.Js. Otherwise the decision no. 407/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Js, the judge rejected the plaintiff's application in its entirety. Both of decisions are included in the case of deffered payment financing, but there are differences in the legal considerations by the judges of the South Jakarta Court so that there are different decision.  Keywords: Dispute Settlement; Deffered Payment Financing; Religious Court DecisionPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menanalisis komparasi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Nomor 1957/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS dan Nomor 407/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JS. Berdasarkan sumber data, penelitian ini termasuk penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum doktrinal. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan tiga pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan komparatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kedua putusan tersebut didasarkan pada pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim dengan mengacu pada dalil-dalil dan undang-undang yang terkait. Hakim mengabulkan permohonan penggugat dalam putusan no. 1957/Pdt.G/2018/Pa.Js. Sebaliknya, dalam putusan no. 407/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Js, hakim menolak permohonan penggugat untuk seluruhnya. Kedua putusan tersebut termasuk dalam perkara pembiayaan akad murabahah, namun terdapat perbedaan pada pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan sehingga terjadi hasil putusal yang berbeda.   Kata kunci: Penyelesaian Sengketa; Pembiayaan Akad Murabahah; Putusan Pengadilan Agam

The Government’s Role in the Implementation of Religious Tolerance Practices in Southeast Asia

The dynamics of Islam within the framework of Islamic majority and minority groups cannot be separated from the government’s role in maintaining religious tolerance. Minority groups such as Moro Muslims in the Philippines, Patani Muslims in Thailand, and Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar have illustrated the government’s minimal role in resolving conflicts between the majority and minorities. Therefore, this paper discusses the Muslim majority and minority groups in several countries and their relationship with the government to implement the practice of religious tolerance. This article uses a library method with a content analysis approach from relevant articles related to the government’s role in implementing religious tolerance practices in Southeast Asia. The study shows that the existence of Islam as a belief of a person and the people who are part of the state and government cannot be separated from one another. In other words, the state’s support for its people of various ethnicity, cultures, and religions will contribute to the peace of the state and the creation of state stability. The position of the majority and minority in the religious process will also influence religious institutions socially, economically, and culturally. Showing the expression of diversity in religious practices in the Southeast Asia region will create a new order in creating peace