3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Essays on migration, remittances and development in origin countries
International migration can potentially improve development and welfare outcomes
in developing countries. However, the impact of this powerful force on left behind
individuals is increasingly investigated but not fully understood. This thesis contributes
to the literature on the effect of international migration and remittances on individuals
left behind. It consists of three self-contained essays that address the following: the
effect of remittances on householdsâ investment decisions, the effect of remittances on
householdsâ labour supply, and the phenomenon of remittance dependency, which is
when remittances undercut the incentives for households to generate income.
The first empirical essay âRemittances and Household Investment Decisions: Evidence
from Sub-Saharan Africaâ provides new evidence on the effect of remittances on
householdsâ investment decisions. The chapter uses cross-sectional data from five
Sub-Saharan African countries, a recursive bivariate probit model and instrumental
variables and imperfect instrumental variable approaches to account for endogeneity
concerns. The results show that remittances increase the likelihood of investment in
human, physical, and social capital in most of the countries analysed. We also find
that remittance sources â whether domestic, within Africa and out-of-Africa â have
a marked effect on household investment decisions. Finally, we find that the income
effect of remittances mainly drives our key findings. However, we also find evidence
of substitution effect by left-behind household members and migration expectations
in some countries. This chapter contributes to the ongoing debate on the effect of
remittances on capital investments.
The second empirical essay âMigration, Remittances and Labour Force Participation:
Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africaâ contributes to the nascent literature on the effect
of international migration and remittances in Sub-Saharan Africa. The chapter uses
cross-sectional data from five Sub-Saharan African countries, instrumental variables
and imperfect instrumental variable approaches to account for endogeneity concerns.
The results show that the effect of remittances on labour supply in Sub-Saharan Africa
differs by country. I find that remittances increase labour supply (at the extensive
margin) in Nigeria and Burkina Faso, no statistically significant effects in Kenya
and Uganda, and a negative effect in Senegal. The results in Senegal and Burkina
Faso are driven by female left behind household members and are stronger in rural
areas. Meanwhile, remittances ease liquidity constraints in Nigeria and facilitates the
establishment of small businesses for men. Analysis of mechanisms show that the
results are mainly driven by the income effect of remittances and to a lesser extent the
liquidity effect of remittances. I do not find evidence of the labour lost effect in any of
the countries under review.
The third empirical essay âRemittances and Household Dependence: Evidence from
Bangladeshâ re-examines the notion in the literature that remittance receipt leads
to dependency culture. We use cross-sectional data from Bangladesh, instrumental
variable and imperfect instrumental variables approach to account for endogeneity
concerns. The results show that remittance receipt increases the probability of
households to engage in income generating activities and increase householdâs
non-remittance income. Taken together, our result show that remittances does
not lead to remittance dependence, as suggested by the migration and remittance
literature. Instead, remittances ease householdsâ liquidity constraints and facilitates
investment in capital and other income generating activities that increases householdsâ
non-remittance income. We also show that health-productivity and liquidity effect are
two main mechanisms through which remittances affect household dependence
Recommended from our members
For what itâs worth: European Arts & Humanities graduatesâ employability and their engagement in society
How do European Arts and Humanities (A&H) graduates contribute to their economies and societies? This paper aims to answer this challenging research question by analysing data from the 2018 pilot Eurograduate survey of graduates. The article explores the monitoring of employment dynamics and considers the labour market outcomes of A&H graduates compared to other graduate groups. Our analysis enables an understanding of the utilisation of A&H graduatesâ knowledge and skills in the current employment market (job-qualification match) and more specifically, their contribution to legal, social and cultural occupations. The dataset variables enable an exploration of the multiple contributions made by A&H graduates to other aspects of contemporary society. Specifically, we examine graduatesâ volunteering activity during and after their degree, alongside other forms of civic engagement, including political and social action. The findings contribute to the broader debate on the value and impact of A&H degrees beyond measurements of graduate earnings
Recommended from our members
The age-wage-productivity puzzle: evidence from the careers of top earners
There is an inverted u-shaped relationship between age and wages in most labour markets and occupations, but the effects of age on productivity are often unclear. We use panel data on productivity and salaries in a market of high earners, professional footballers (soccer players) in North America, to estimate age-productivity and age-wage profiles. We find stark differences between these profiles; wages continue to increase for several years after productivity has peaked, before dropping sharply at the end of a career. This discrepancy poses the question: why are middle-aged workers seemingly overpaid relative to their contemporaneous productivity? The richness of our dataset allows us to investigate a range of possible mechanisms that could be responsible, including institutional factors, unobserved elements of productivity, and a talent discovery theory, by which teams pay younger players less because their productivity is more uncertain. We find some evidence that tentatively supports this last mechanism