25 research outputs found

    SDS-PAGE profile of purified recombinant proteins.

    No full text
    <p>SDS-PAGE (10%) of purified recombinant proteins from <i>E.coli</i> BL-21 transformed with pGEX-<i>WsCPR1</i> and pGEX-<i>WsCPR2</i>. Lane 1; Standard protein markers, Lane 2&3; Cell lysate (CL) of WsCPR1 and WsCPR2 expressing cells remained after incubation with GST-beads, Lane 4; Purified recombinant GST-fused WsCPR1, Lane 5; Purified recombinant GST fused WsCPR2, Lane 6; Purified WsCPR1 after removal of GST using thrombin and Lane 7; Purified CPR2 after removal of GST.</p

    Three dimensional models and conserved residue prediction for WsCPR1 and WsCPR2.

    No full text
    <p>4A & 4D: Cartoon display of the 3-D structures of WsCPR1 <i>and</i> WsCPR2 as predicted by Phyre<sup>2</sup> using crystal structure of <i>Rattus norvagicus</i> (PDB ID: 1J9Z) as template. 4B & 4E: Predicted ligand (shown in green) binding sites as predicted by 3DLigandSite Web Server. 4C & 4F: Conserved residue analysis of <i>WsCPR1 and WsCPR2</i> were performed using Consurf and Conseq web servers. Residue conservation from variable to conserve is shown in blue (1) to violet (9). The residues involved in substrate binding and active site are shown in the center core of the structure.</p

    Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA.

    No full text
    <p>A&B: Southern blot analysis of total DNA using <i>WsCPR1</i> and <i>WsCPR2</i> as a probe. Total DNA (30 µg) isolated from <i>Withania somnifera</i> was digested with the indicated restriction enzymes, The digested samples were electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel, blotted onto nylon membrane and subjected to hybridisation using DIG-labelled ORF of <i>WsCPR1</i> and <i>WsCPR2</i> as probes. First lane contains molecular markers with indicated molecular weight on the left side.</p

    Phylogenetic analysis of deduced amino acid sequences.

    No full text
    <p>Phylogeny of <i>WsCPRs</i> was inferred using the Neighbor-joining method using MEGA 5 software. A total of 33 protein sequences used for analysis were from following plant species: <i>Withania somnifera</i> (WsCPR1: HM036710, WsCPR2: GU808569), <i>Petunia hybrida</i> (CPR1: DQ099544, CPR2: DQ099545); <i>Petroselinum crispum</i> (CPR1: AF024635, CPR2: AF024634); <i>Gossipium hirsutum</i> (CPR1: FJ719368, CPR2: FJ719369); <i>Populus trichocarpa</i> (CPR1: XM_002307300, CPR2: XM_002329600, CPR3: AF302498); <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (CPR1: X66016, CPR2: X66017); <i>Capsicum annuum</i> (EU616557); <i>Vigna radiata</i> (P37116); <i>Vicia sativa</i> (Z26252); <i>Stevia rebaudiana</i> (DQ269454); <i>Ricinus communis</i> (XM_002514003); <i>Pisum sativum</i> (AF002698); <i>Picrorhiza kurroo</i>a (JN968968); <i>Artemisia annua</i> (EF104642); <i>Papaver somniferum</i> (U67185); <i>Taxus cuspidate</i> (AY571340); <i>Taxus chinensis</i> (AY959320); <i>Perilla frutescens</i> (GQ120439); <i>Ophiorrhiza pumila</i> (AB086169); <i>Medicago truncatula</i> (XM_003610061); <i>Lotus japonicas</i> (AB433810); <i>Catharanthus roseus</i> (Q05001); <i>Centaurium erythraea</i> (AY596976); <i>Zea mays</i> (CAC83301); <i>Triticum aestivum</i> (AGC27711) and <i>Eschscholzia californica</i> (U67186). All CPRs were grouped into two clusters where the WsCPR1 and WsCPR2 confined to their corresponding cluster like other CPRs.</p

    Tissue-specific real-time expression analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Quantitative assessment of the expression of <i>WsCPR1</i> and <i>WsCPR2</i> in different tissues of <i>Withania somnifera.</i> Data were compared and analysed with analysis of variance (<i>ANOVA</i>). Values are means, with standard errors indicated by bars, representing three independent biological samples, each with three technical replicates. Differences were scored as statistical significance at *<i>p</i><0.05 and **<i>p</i><0.01 levels.</p

    Time course effect of elicitor treatments on withanolides accumulation.

    No full text
    <p>10A: Effect of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment on withanolides accumulation at different time intervals. HPLC analysis demonstrated the change in three key withanolides of withanolide A (WS-1), withanone (WS-2) and withaferin A (WS-3) at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after treatments of micro-shoots with 0.1 mM MeJA. WS-3 was observed to be enhanced more with respect to WS-1 while WS-2 was detected in sample harvested after 48 h. All values obtained were means of triplicate with standard errors. Time course accumulation of WS-1 and WS-3 was statistically significant at <i>p</i><0.01 level. 10B: Effect of salicylic acid (SA) on withanolide accumulation at different time interval. The WS-3 level was also up-regulated in salicylic acid treated samples but WS-1 was enhanced more in comparison to methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treated samples. All values obtained were means of triplicate with standard errors. Time course accumulation of WS-1 and WS-3 was statistically significant at <i>p</i><0.001 level.</p

    An overview of putative withanolide biosynthesic pathway.

    No full text
    <p>DXP: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate, HMBDP: 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate, IPP:Isopentylpyrophosphate, DMPP: Dimethylalyl diphosphate, IPP isomerase: Isopentylpyrophosphate isomerase, FPPS: farnesyldiphosphate synthase, SQS: Squalene synthase, SQE/CPR: Squalene epoxidase/cytochrome P450 reductase, CAS: Cycloartinol synthase, SMT-1: Sterol methyl transferase/cytochrome P450 reductase, ODM/CPR: Obtusifoliol-14-demethylase/cytochrome P450 reductase. First three highlighted (yellow) steps indicating involvement of P450 monooxygenases and CPR. Single dark arrows represent one step, two or more dark arrows represent multiple steps and dashed arrow represents unknown steps. Below the pathway: chemical structure of important withanolides.</p

    NADPH-Cytochrome P450 Reductase: Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of Two Paralogs from <em>Withania somnifera</em> (L.) Dunal

    No full text
    <div><p><i>Withania somnifera</i> (L.) Dunal, a highly reputed medicinal plant, synthesizes a large array of steroidal lactone triterpenoids called withanolides. Although its chemical profile and pharmacological activities have been studied extensively during the last two decades, limited attempts have been made to decipher the biosynthetic route and identification of key regulatory genes involved in withanolide biosynthesis. Cytochrome P450 reductase is the most imperative redox partner of multiple P450s involved in primary and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. We describe here the cloning and characterization of two paralogs of cytochrome P450 reductase from <i>W. somnifera</i>. The full length paralogs of <i>WsCPR1</i> and <i>WsCPR2</i> have open reading frames of 2058 and 2142 bp encoding 685 and 713 amino acid residues, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that grouping of dual CPRs was in accordance with class I and class II of eudicotyledon CPRs. The corresponding coding sequences were expressed in <i>Escherichia coli</i> as glutathione-<i>S</i>-transferase fusion proteins, purified and characterized. Recombinant proteins of both the paralogs were purified with their intact membrane anchor regions and it is hitherto unreported for other CPRs which have been purified from microsomal fraction. Southern blot analysis suggested that two divergent isoforms of CPR exist independently in <i>Withania</i> genome. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis indicated that both genes were widely expressed in leaves, stalks, roots, flowers and berries with higher expression level of <i>WsCPR2</i> in comparison to <i>WsCPR1</i>. Similar to CPRs of other plant species, <i>WsCPR1</i> was un-inducible while <i>WsCPR2</i> transcript level increased in a time-dependent manner after elicitor treatments. High performance liquid chromatography of withanolides extracted from elicitor-treated samples showed a significant increase in two of the key withanolides, withanolide A and withaferin A, possibly indicating the role of <i>WsCPR2</i> in withanolide biosynthesis. Present investigation so far is the only report of characterization of CPR paralogs from <i>W. somnifera</i>.</p> </div

    Molecular Characterization of UGT94F2 and UGT86C4, Two Glycosyltransferases from <i>Picrorhiza kurrooa</i>: Comparative Structural Insight and Evaluation of Substrate Recognition

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferases (UGTs) are pivotal in the process of glycosylation for decorating natural products with sugars. It is one of the versatile mechanisms in determining chemical complexity and diversity for the production of suite of pharmacologically active plant natural products. <i>Picrorhiza kurrooa</i> is a highly reputed medicinal herb known for its hepato-protective properties which are attributed to a novel group of iridoid glycosides known as picrosides. Although the plant is well studied in terms of its pharmacological properties, very little is known about the biosynthesis of these important secondary metabolites. In this study, we identified two family-1 glucosyltransferases from <i>P. kurrooa</i>. The full length cDNAs of UGT94F4 and UGT86C4 contained open reading frames of 1455 and 1422 nucleotides, encoding polypeptides of 484 and 473 amino acids respectively. UGT94F2 and UGT86C4 showed differential expression pattern in leaves, rhizomes and inflorescence. To elucidate whether the differential expression pattern of the two <i>Picrorhiza</i> UGTs correlate with transcriptional regulation <i>via</i> their promoters and to identify elements that could be recognized by known iridoid-specific transcription factors, upstream regions of each gene were isolated and scanned for putative <i>cis</i>-regulatory elements. Interestingly, the presence of <i>cis</i>-regulatory elements within the promoter regions of each gene correlated positively with their expression profiles in response to different phytohormones. HPLC analysis of picrosides extracted from different tissues and elicitor-treated samples showed a significant increase in picroside levels, corroborating well with the expression profile of UGT94F2 possibly indicating its implication in picroside biosynthesis. Using homology modeling and molecular docking studies, we provide an insight into the donor and acceptor specificities of both UGTs identified in this study. UGT94F2 was predicted to be an iridoid-specific glucosyltransferase having maximum binding affinity towards 7-deoxyloganetin while as UGT86C4 was predicted to be a kaempferol-specific glucosyltransferase. These are the first UGTs being reported from <i>P. kurrooa.</i></p></div
    corecore