Cognitive neuroscience of delusions in aging

Assessments and clinical understanding of late-onset delusions in the elderly are inconsistent and often incomplete. In this review, we consider the prevalence, neurobehavioral features, and neuroanatomic correlations of delusions in elderly persons – those with documented cognitive decline and those with no evidence of cognitive decline. Both groups exhibit a common phenotype: delusions are either of persecution or of misidentification. Late-onset delusions show a nearly complete absence of the grandiose, mystical, or erotomanic content typical of early onset psychoses. Absent also from both elderly populations are formal thought disorders, thought insertions, and delusions of external control. Neuroimaging and behavioral studies suggest a frontotemporal localization of delusions in the elderly, with right hemispheric lateralization in delusional misidentification and left lateralization in delusions of persecution. We propose that delusions in the elderly reflect a common neuroanatomic and functional phenotype, and we discuss applications of our proposal to diagnosis and treatment

Choice of observational study design impacts on measurement of antipsychotic risks in the elderly: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are frequently and increasingly prescribed to treat the behavioural symptoms associated with dementia despite their modest efficacy. Evidence regarding the potential adverse events of antipsychotics is limited and little is known about the longer-term safety of these medicines in the elderly. The aim of this review was to determine the impact of the choice of observational study design and methods used to control for confounding on the measurement of antipsychotic risks in elderly patients. METHODS: We searched PUBMED and the Cochrane controlled trials register for double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses and published observational studies of antipsychotics. RESULTS: Forty four studies were identified for the endpoints; death, cerebrovascular events, hip fracture and pneumonia. RCTs found a 20% to 30% increased risk of death, or an absolute increase of 1extra death per 100 patients with atypical antipsychotics compared to non-use. Cohort and instrumental variable analyses estimated between 2 to 7 extra deaths per 100 patients with conventional compared to atypical antipsychotics. RCTs found a 2 to 3 times increased risk of all cerebrovascular events with atypical antipsychotics compared to placebo and no association with serious stroke that required hospitalisation. Observational studies using cohort and self-controlled case-series designs reported similar results; no association where the endpoint was stroke causing hospitalisation and a doubling of risk when minor stroke was included. No RCTs were available for the outcome of hip fracture or pneumonia. Observational studies reported a 20% to 40% increased risk of hip fracture with both antipsychotic classes compared to non-use. The risk of pneumonia was a 2 to 3 times greater with both classes compared to non-use while a self-controlled case-series study estimated a 60% increased risk. Conventional antipsychotics were associated with a 50% greater hip fracture risk than atypical antipsychotics, while the risk of pneumonia was similar between the classes. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of observational study design is critical in studying the adverse effects of antispychotics. Cohort and instrumental variable analyses gave more consistent results to clinical studies for mortality outcomes as have self-controlled case-series for the risk of cerebrovascular events and stroke. Observational evidence has highlighted the potential for antipsychotics to be associated with serious adverse events that were not reported in RCTs including hip fracture and pneumonia. Good quality observational studies are required, that employ appropriate study designs that are robust towards unmeasured confounding, to confirm the potential excess risk of hip fracture and pneumonia with antipsychotics.Nicole Pratt, Elizabeth E. Roughead, Amy Salter and Philip Rya

Frontotemporal dementia: behavioral symptoms and caregiver distress.

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: To discern behavioral problems that co-occur in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients, and to investigate the relation between behavioral clusters and the burden for caregivers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Baseline data of 63 FTD patients and their respective caregivers were used to detect the behavioral clusters in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the accompanying distress evoked in caregivers. To detect the clusters in behavior of the FTD patients, we performed multidimensional scaling (procedure: PROXSCAL). Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the association between behavior of patients and the distress experienced by caregivers. RESULTS: This was the first study that found behavioral clusters for FTD. Two behavioral clusters were found: agitation/psychosis (comprising delusions, hallucinations, irritability and agitation) and mood (made up of anxiety and depression). The remaining NPI domains (euphoria, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior and apathy were found to be autonomous. After controlling for relevant confounding factors, caregiver distress was strongest related to agitation/psychosis, followed by mood. Disinhibition and aberrant motor behavior were mildly related to caregiver distress. Euphoria and apathy were not significantly related to distress. Caregivers of patients living at home were more distressed by the behavioral problems of the FTD patients than caregivers of hospitalized patients. DISCUSSION: The high prevalence of psychopathology in FTD patients and the associated caregiver distress was confirmed in this study. Clustering behavioral symptoms allows investigation of the relationship between structural or functional cerebral deficits and neuropsychiatric symptoms