DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION MODEL IN COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) OF ENGLISH TEACHERS IN PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SCHOOLS IN THAILAND

The general objective of this study was to develop an evaluation model in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) of English teachers in primary educational schools with the research and development process. Administrations of research procedures in four phases that it consisted of: the first phase was to synthesis concepts regarding the evaluation of teaching English for communication of teachers in primary educational schools by the analysis and synthesis of the CLT information from documents related research and interviews from those involved of 10 persons. The second phase was creating an evaluation model to evaluate the CLT of English teachers in primary educational schools by bringing the concept of phase one used to create the evaluation model, then the draft form for review, verify appropriateness and feasibility of the evaluation model through seminars, based on an expert group of nine persons who created the manual models to assess and evaluate your usage patterns such assessments by five educational experts of prior to trial in a real situation. The third phase was to trial evaluation model of the CLT of English teachers in primary educational schools. The development and the validity of the classification scheme, which sample consisted of 14 plants from the sample-specific were used. The fourth phase was to develop the evaluation model to evaluate the CLT of English teachers in primary educational schools with the sample consisted of the sample evaluation forms with a group of 43 assessors were assessed. Using the collective data in this research include of duvets, interview, observation and evaluative forms. Statistically significant with the foundational statistics include percentage, mean and standard deviation, statistical hypothesis testing, including the Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Test and The Mann - Whitney U Test were analyzed. The results of this research findings: Teaching English for communication and evaluation of teaching English for communication of teachers in primary educational schools with the CLT, the principles and concepts of learning as a Core Curriculum for the Basic Education Act BE 2551 and the indicators due course was matched of the policy of the Ministry of Education to raise the quality of teaching in English and composed of four components, namely; the goal of the assessment, to be aimed at evaluating, assessing methodology, and evaluation criteria. The goal of the assessment is to improve the quality of the CLT that are geared rate, the concept of the CLT factors, such as; the process, the production, the assessment methods include internal appraisers. The external evaluation process includes the preparation stage, the action of summary report assessment tools include questionnaire, interview and observation period to assess the second semester of the semester and before recess. The evaluation criteria are absolute criteria developed by the educational experts to develop teachers are making progress in the CLT were evaluated in two times that results of statistically significant at level of 0.01, differently. To assess the developing an evaluation model in the CLT of English teachers in primary educational schools was to standard rate of utilization, the possibility, he appropriateness and accuracy were at the highest level, and the exploitation and the possibility is high-level.  Article visualizations

DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUCCESSFULLY EVALUATION MODEL OF THE RELIANCE PERFORMANCE ONE STOP CRISIS CENTER (OSCC) UNDER THE MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH

The value of work and the quality of the reliance centers that it rely on the quality achieved in practice and develop to contribute to care of children, women and family members who abused effective as well. The aims of this research study was to develop the successfully evaluation model of the reliantly performance One Stop Crisis Center (OSCC) under the Ministry of Public Health to administer with the research and development process that combines quantitative and qualitative methods are classified into four stages contained of synthesis and analysis of current problems and assessment, the texts, articles, research papers, and databases. Experts interviewed of nine personnel and to have a group discussion multidisciplinary team of the OSCC as 40 people was involved. The development of assessment and manual evaluation model to the information taken from the first step of the assessment form checked the suitability and feasibility of the model by 15 highly qualified persons with the technical discussions by the experts multipath characteristics (Multi Attribute Consensus Reaching: MACR). Trial assessment form with a sample size of 6 OSCC centers and the Development of the Successfully Evaluation Model (DSEM) was evaluated by those concerned with the evaluation form with 17 related persons who involved in the trial design. Using the research instruments to collect data consisted of assessment questionnaires and interviews. The statistically significant was used in this study consists of foundational statistics, including average, standard deviation, median and range between quartiles and test hypothesis by experiment and independent t-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results of this findings were followed as: The DSEM model to evaluate the results achieved in the practice of relying on an OSCC center under the Ministry of Public Health consists of seven components: the purpose of the assessment, content and indicators aimed at evaluating, evaluation criteria, assessor, methods and tools, evaluating, the duration of the evaluation, and information and user feedback. The results from the assessment of: evaluation form, the assessment is to meet the current situation and discrimination (ρ<0.05) as well as external evaluator and center. The OSCC on self-assessment to develop a quality management system are provides a dependable, and to evaluate the model, the quality standards of accuracy appropriate possibilities and utility in all aspects, and a multidisciplinary team to rely on the form evidence of high satisfaction in all on components