Sensitivity analyses of obesity leading to depression.

<p>Sensitivity analyses of obesity leading to depression.</p

Sensitivity analyses of depression leading to obesity.

<p>Sensitivity analyses of depression leading to obesity.</p

Characteristics of the included studies.

<p>Characteristics of the included studies.</p

Flow diagram of the selection of articles through study.

<p><b>from:</b> Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097. doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097" target="_blank">10.1371/journal.pmed1000097</a></p

Pooled estimates of incidence depression leading to obesity measured in terms of relative and absolute risk using quality effect model.

<p>Pooled estimates of incidence depression leading to obesity measured in terms of relative and absolute risk using quality effect model.</p

Additional file 2: of Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Figure S1. Results of network meta-analysis of 21 studies with children as a study population. (TIFF 624 kb

Additional file 4: of Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Figure S3. Funnel plot depicting asymmetry for the PD-NI comparison. (TIFF 1482 kb

Additional file 1: of Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Table S1. Search Strategy. Table S2. Meta-analysis of different control measures against NI using the random effects model under the generalized pairwise modeling (GPM) framework in MetaXL. Table S3. Meta-analysis of different control measures against NI using the random effects model under the frequentist multivariate meta-analysis framework (mvmeta) in Stata. Table S4. Quality scale. Table S5. Summary of the excluded studies. Table S6. Drugs used in the included studies. Table S7. Description of ITN’s used across the studies. Table S8. Description of IRS treatments used across the included studies. Table S9. Quality assessment scores of included studies. (DOCX 56 kb

Additional file 3: of Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Figure S2. Results of network meta-analysis of 28 studies with incidence of Plasmodium falciparum. (TIFF 631 kb