5 research outputs found
Support provided by the HEC project to villagers during the three project phases discussed in the text.
<p>Support provided by the HEC project to villagers during the three project phases discussed in the text.</p
Comparison of the effectiveness of the two different crop protection systems tested: Community-based crop-guarding with conventional tools (at the ‘conventional’ sites) and community-based crop-guarding with chili-grease fences and trip-wire triggered sirens (the ‘chili-and-sirens’ sites) in Phases 1 and 2.
<p>Comparison of the effectiveness of the two different crop protection systems tested: Community-based crop-guarding with conventional tools (at the ‘conventional’ sites) and community-based crop-guarding with chili-grease fences and trip-wire triggered sirens (the ‘chili-and-sirens’ sites) in Phases 1 and 2.</p
Proportion of attempted elephant raids repelled by villagers using voluntary community-based crop protection methods (‘conventional’ methods) for 16 villages in Phase 3.
<p>Proportion of attempted elephant raids repelled by villagers using voluntary community-based crop protection methods (‘conventional’ methods) for 16 villages in Phase 3.</p
Crop protection methods used in the ‘conventional’ sites and the ‘chili-and-sirens’ sites in Phases 1 and 2.
<p>Crop protection methods used in the ‘conventional’ sites and the ‘chili-and-sirens’ sites in Phases 1 and 2.</p
Project area in and around Way Kambas National Park (WKNP), Sumatra, Indonesia.
<p>The top right panel depicts the island of Sumatra in relation to Peninsular Malaysia and Java, with the study area in a box. The left panel depicts the boxed area in greater detail with remaining forest cover shown in green. The bottom right panel shows WKNP and the 16 villages mentioned in the text. Figure used by permission of the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), original copyright owner [original copyright year 2007], under a CC BY license.</p