Longitudinal Associations Between ATPase Inhibitory Factor 1, Growth Differentiation Factor-15, and Nutritional Status in Older Adults From the MAPT Study

International audienceAbstract Background Weight and appetite regulation have been associated with the expression and secretion of ATPase inhibitory factor 1 (IF1) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), 2 potential biomarkers for age-related mitochondrial dysfunction. The aim was to explore the associations between these biomarkers and nutritional variables in the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial study. Methods IF1 and GDF-15 plasma levels were quantified at 1-year follow-up. The nutritional status was measured using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score variation between baseline and 1- and 2-year visits; appetite loss was extracted from the MNA. Bodyweight was measured every 6 months until the third year and then yearly until the fifth year of follow-up, and weight loss was established if the loss was greater than 5% or 10% within the past 6 or 12 months, respectively. Bidirectional associations of IF1 and GDF-15 levels with malnutrition, appetite, and weight loss were examined. The interactions between individual IF1 and GDF-15 with sex were explored. Results Four hundred and forty-eight participants had MNA data and 1 045 had weight loss data. All the associations between IF1 levels and the MNA score, appetite loss, and weight loss were nonsignificant. Higher GDF-15 levels were cross-sectionally associated with appetite loss at the first year of follow-up, and the GDF-15 highest quartile was associated with nearly 80% higher risks of weight loss over 4 years. Interactions between IF1 and GDF-15 levels, and between these 2 markers and sex were not significantly associated with the outcomes. Conclusions GDF-15 plasma levels were related to key malnutrition criteria

Adherence to multidomain interventions for dementia prevention: Data from the FINGER and MAPT trials

Introduction: Multidomain interventions, targeting multiple risk factors simultaneously, could be effective dementia prevention strategies, but may be burdensome and not universally acceptable. Methods: We studied adherence rates and predictors in the Finnish Geriatric Intervevntion Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability and Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial prevention trials, for all intervention components (separately and simultaneously). Finnish Geriatric Intervevntion Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability participants received a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention (physical training, cognitive training, nutritional counseling, and cardiovascular monitoring). Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial participants received a 3-year multidomain lifestyle intervention (cognitive training, physical activity counseling, and nutritional counseling) with either an omega-3 supplement or placebo. Results: Adherence decreased with increasing intervention complexity and intensity: it was highest for cardiovascular monitoring, nutritional counseling, and the omega-3 supplement, and lowest for unsupervised computer-based cognitive training. The most consistent baseline predictors of adherence were smoking and depressive symptoms. Discussion: Reducing participant burden, while ensuring that technological tools are suitable for older individuals, maintaining face-to-face contacts, and taking into account participant characteristics may increase adherence in future trials