88 research outputs found

    Trust based routing protocol in MANET

    Get PDF
    Traditional network routing protocols find the shortest path by minimizing a cost over the paths. Number of hops is the most common metric to measure this cost of forwarding. However, this administrative cost metric is not guaranteed to have the same level of quality in mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). In addition malicious nature of nodes augments the problem even further. There is a need for generic cost metric to find the most reliable path for forwarding the packets. We propose a trust-based metric for routing in MANETs. This metric works as a reliability measure of nodes and the ad hoc routing protocol tries to find the most reliable path. We propose a quantitative measure of trustworthiness of a node based on node's properties like signal strength, stability, node's performance to forward packets and its rating by other nodes. To our knowledge, our approach is the first attempt to use a generic trust metric for reliable routing in MANETs

    Fabrication and Characterisation of Polyaniline/Laponite based Semiconducting Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Material

    Get PDF
    Novel organic-inorganic semiconducting hybrid material is developed by chemically grafting polyaniline (PANI) onto an inorganic template, Laponite. The surface active silanol groups of the Laponite sheets were silylated with an aniline functionalised 3-phenylaminopropyltrimethoxysilane (PAPTMOS) coupling agent followed by deposition of PANI onto the silylated surface. The method includes the reaction of Laponite with PAPTMOS dissolved in a very small amount of methanol at 110 °C for 44 h in a vacuum oven, interaction of the silylated product with PANI via in situ polymerisation of aniline and one-step isolation process by means of the removal of the non-connected PANI with N-methylpyrrolidinone-diethylamine binary solvent. After isolation and re-doping with methane sulfonic acid the Laponite-PAPTMOS-PANI hybrid becomes electrically conductive. The chemical attachment of PANI with silylated Laponite in the hybrids were characterised by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and scanning electron microscopy.Defence Science Journal, Vol. 64, No. 3, May 2014, pp. 193-197, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/dsj.64.718

    Zero-divisor graph of the rings CP(X)C_\mathscr{P}(X) and C∞P(X)C^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X)

    Full text link
    In this article we introduce the zero-divisor graphs ΓP(X)\Gamma_\mathscr{P}(X) and Γ∞P(X)\Gamma^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X) of the two rings CP(X)C_\mathscr{P}(X) and C∞P(X)C^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X); here P\mathscr{P} is an ideal of closed sets in XX and CP(X)C_\mathscr{P}(X) is the aggregate of those functions in C(X)C(X), whose support lie on P\mathscr{P}. C∞P(X)C^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X) is the P\mathscr{P} analogue of the ring C∞(X)C_\infty (X). We find out conditions on the topology on XX, under-which ΓP(X)\Gamma_\mathscr{P}(X) (respectively, Γ∞P(X)\Gamma^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X)) becomes triangulated/ hypertriangulated. We realize that ΓP(X)\Gamma_\mathscr{P}(X) (respectively, Γ∞P(X)\Gamma^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X)) is a complemented graph if and only if the space of minimal prime ideals in CP(X)C_\mathscr{P}(X) (respectively Γ∞P(X)\Gamma^\mathscr{P}_\infty(X)) is compact. This places a special case of this result with the choice P≡\mathscr{P}\equiv the ideals of closed sets in XX, obtained by Azarpanah and Motamedi in \cite{Azarpanah} on a wider setting. We also give an example of a non-locally finite graph having finite chromatic number. Finally it is established with some special choices of the ideals P\mathscr{P} and Q\mathscr{Q} on XX and YY respectively that the rings CP(X)C_\mathscr{P}(X) and CQ(Y)C_\mathscr{Q}(Y) are isomorphic if and only if ΓP(X)\Gamma_\mathscr{P}(X) and ΓQ(Y)\Gamma_\mathscr{Q}(Y) are isomorphic

    Intrinsic characterizations of C-realcompact spaces

    Full text link
    [EN] c-realcompact spaces are introduced by Karamzadeh and Keshtkar in Quaest. Math. 41, no. 8 (2018), 1135-1167. We offer a characterization of these spaces X via c-stable family of closed sets in X by showing that  X is c-realcompact if and only if each c-stable family of closed sets in X with finite intersection property has nonempty intersection. This last condition which makes sense for an arbitrary topological space can be taken as an alternative definition of a c-realcompact space. We show that each topological space can be extended as a dense subspace to a c-realcompact space with some desired extension properties. An allied class of spaces viz CP-compact spaces akin to that of c-realcompact spaces are introduced. The paper ends after examining how far a known class of c-realcompact spaces could be realized as CP-compact for appropriately chosen ideal P of closed sets in X.University Grand Commission, New Delhi, research fellowship (F. No. 16-9 (June 2018)/2019 (NET/CSIR))Acharyya, SK.; Bharati, R.; Deb Ray, A. (2021). Intrinsic characterizations of C-realcompact spaces. Applied General Topology. 22(2):295-302. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2021.13696OJS295302222S. K. Acharyya and S. K. Ghosh, A note on functions in C(X) with support lying on an ideal of closed subsets of X, Topology Proc. 40 (2012), 297-301.S. K. Acharyya and S. K. Ghosh, Functions in C(X) with support lying on a class of subsets of X, Topology Proc. 35 (2010), 127-148.S. K. Acharyya, R. Bharati and A. Deb Ray, Rings and subrings of continuous functions with countable range, Queast. Math., to appear. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073606.2020.1752322F. Azarpanah, O. A. S. Karamzadeh, Z. Keshtkar and A. R. Olfati, On maximal ideals of Cc(X)C_c(X) and the uniformity of its localizations, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 48, no. 2 (2018), 345-384. https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-2018-48-2-345P. Bhattacherjee, M. L. Knox and W. W. Mcgovern, The classical ring of quotients of Cc(X)C_c(X), Appl. Gen. Topol. 15, no. 2 (2014), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2014.3181L. Gillman and M. Jerison, Rings of Continuous Functions, Van Nostrand Reinhold co., New York, 1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7819-2M. Ghadermazi, O. A. S. Karamzadeh and M. Namdari, On the functionally countable subalgebras of C(X), Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova. 129 (2013), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.4171/RSMUP/129-4O. A. S. Karamzadeh and Z. Keshtkar, On c-realcompact spaces, Queast. Math. 41, no. 8 (2018), 1135-1167. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073606.2018.1441919M. Mandelkar, Supports of continuous functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 156 (1971), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1971-0275367-4R. M. Stephenson Jr, Initially k-compact and related spaces, in: Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology, ed. Kenneth Kunen and Jerry E. Vaughan. Amsterdam, North-Holland, (1984) 603-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-86580-9.50016-1A. Veisi, ece_c-filters and ece_c-ideals in the functionally countable subalgebra of C∗(X)C^*(X), Appl. Gen. Topol. 20, no. 2 (2019), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2019.1152

    UU-topology and mm-topology on the ring of Measurable Functions, generalized and revisited

    Full text link
    Let M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) be the ring of all real valued measurable functions defined over the measurable space (X,A)(X,\mathcal{A}). Given an ideal II in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) and a measure μ:A→[0,∞]\mu:\mathcal{A}\to[0,\infty], we introduce the UμIU_\mu^I-topology and the mμIm_\mu^I-topology on M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) as generalized versions of the topology of uniform convergence or the UU-topology and the mm-topology on M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) respectively. With I=M(X,A)I=\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), these two topologies reduce to the UμU_\mu-topology and the mμm_\mu-topology on M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) respectively, already considered before. If II is a countably generated ideal in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), then the UμIU_\mu^I-topology and the mμIm_\mu^I-topology coincide if and only if X∖⋂Z[I]X\setminus \bigcap Z[I] is a μ\mu-bounded subset of XX. The components of 00 in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) in the UμIU_\mu^I-topology and the mμIm_\mu^I-topology are realized as I∩L∞(X,A,μ)I\cap L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu) and I∩Lψ(X,A,μ)I\cap L_\psi(X,\mathcal{A},\mu) respectively. Here L∞(X,A,μ)L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu) is the set of all functions in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) which are essentially μ\mu-bounded over XX and Lψ(X,A,μ)={f∈M(X,A): ∀g∈M(X,A),f.g∈L∞(X,A,μ)}L_\psi(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)=\{f\in \mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}): ~\forall g\in\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), f.g\in L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)\}. It is established that an ideal II in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) is dense in the UμU_\mu-topology if and only if it is dense in the mμm_\mu-topology and this happens when and only when there exists Z∈Z[I]Z\in Z[I] such that μ(Z)=0\mu(Z)=0. Furthermore, it is proved that II is closed in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) in the mμm_\mu-topology if and only if it is a ZμZ_\mu-ideal in the sense that if f≡gf\equiv g almost everywhere on XX with f∈If\in I and g∈M(X,A)g\in\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), then g∈Ig\in I

    A Generalization of m m -topology and U U -topology on rings of measurable functions

    Full text link
    For a measurable space (X,AX,\mathcal{A}), let M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) be the corresponding ring of all real valued measurable functions and let μ\mu be a measure on (X,AX,\mathcal{A}). In this paper, we generalize the so-called mμm_{\mu} and UμU_{\mu} topologies on M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) via an ideal II in the ring M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}). The generalized versions will be referred to as the mμIm_{\mu_{I}} and UμIU_{\mu_{I}} topology, respectively, throughout the paper. LI∞(μ)L_{I}^{\infty} \left(\mu\right) stands for the subring of M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) consisting of all functions that are essentially II-bounded (over the measure space (X,A,μX,\mathcal{A}, \mu)). Also let Iμ(X,A)={f∈M(X,A): for every g∈M(X,A),fg  is essentially II_{\mu} (X,\mathcal{A}) = \big \{ f \in \mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) : \, \text{for every} \, g \in \mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), fg \, \, \text{is essentially} \, I-bounded}\text{bounded} \big \}. Then Iμ(X,A)I_{\mu} (X,\mathcal{A}) is an ideal in M(X,A)\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}) containing II and contained in LI∞(μ)L_{I}^{\infty} \left(\mu\right). It is also shown that Iμ(X,A)I_{\mu} (X,\mathcal{A}) and LI∞(μ)L_{I}^{\infty} \left(\mu\right) are the components of 00 in the spaces mμIm_{\mu_{I}} and UμIU_{\mu_{I}}, respectively. Additionally, we obtain a chain of necessary and sufficient conditions as to when these two topologies coincide
    • …
    corecore