22 research outputs found

    Transcript - XIII NLSIR Symposium - Session 1

    No full text
    The first session sought to achieve a re-imagination of the constitutional understandings of substantive equality, dignity and opportunity, as informed by recent political and jurisprudential thought. The panel for this session consisted of Dr Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Prof N Sukumar and Dr Sumit Baudh, with Dr Sumit Baudh3 also acting as the moderator for the session

    Thoracic curlicue: A case of ureteral herniation

    No full text
    Isolated herniation of ureter into thoracic cavity due to a defect in the diaphragm is a very rare entity. We present clinical details and radiographic images of an incidentally detected herniation of right ureter into the thorax in an elderly lady with no previous history of trauma or urinary tract symptoms. This acquired but asymptomatic condition is confirmed by radiologic imaging that reveals the classical loop configuration which is described as the curlicue sign. Further evaluation had revealed mild renal failure but with no definite evidence of obstruction. In view of age and asymptomatic status, patient was offered non-surgical management

    Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy—Is It Any Different in Phaeochromocytoma and Non-Phaeochromocytoma?

    Get PDF
    Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for phaeochromocytoma is a feasible, safe and effective treatment. The effects of associated catecholamine release render LA more challenging, although with comparable morbidity to LA for other diseases of the adrenal gland. METHODS: Data from case records of 44 patients who underwent LAs between May 2002 and May 2006 were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into a phaeochromocytoma group (Group I) and a non-phaeochromocytoma group (Group II). The aim of this study was to assess the operative course and outcome of LA in the two groups. RESULTS: The mean operating time and blood loss were slightly higher in LA for phaeochromocytomas compared to LA for other pathologies, but these differences were not statistically significant. The mean hospital stay was 3.84 days in both groups. The phaeochromocytoma group had a slightly higher complication rate of 21% compared to 12%. None of the procedures needed open conversion. A terminal hand assist was employed in two patients in Group I and one patient in Group II. Two patients with bilateral phaeochromocytoma had single stage bilateral LA. CONCLUSION: LA is feasible and effective in phaeochromocytoma. It is associated with a slightly longer operating time, more blood loss and complications when compared with non-phaeochromocytoma masses. LA can be done in a single operation for bilateral masses. Terminal hand assist is a viable and effective option for very large masses

    Hemangiopericytoma of the prostate. a rare case report and novel treatment strategy

    No full text
    No Abstract. African Journal of Urology Vol. 11(3) 2005: 236-23

    Concomitant laparoscopic urological procedures: Does it contribute to morbidity?

    No full text
    Aim: With advancement in minimal access surgery two laparoscopic procedures can be combined together shortening the total hospital stay, decreasing morbidity and overall reduced cost. Combining two laparoscopic procedures in a single session has been reported in general surgery. Very few articles are available in literature with regard to combined urological laparoscopic surgeries. This article retrospectively analyses the outcomes of multiple laparoscopic procedures performed in a single stage at our centre. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing simultaneous procedures from May 2003 to Jan 2009 were included in the study. Patients were categorised into three groups according to the primary urological organ involved, for better comparison with the control group. Diseases involving the adrenals gland were grouped in (group 1), kidney (group 2) and renal collecting system/ureter (group 3). All patients had one urological procedure for either of the above-mentioned organs combined with another surgical procedure. Similarly three control groups were chosen according to the primary urological organ involved (group 1c- unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy, group 2c- unilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and group 3c- unilateral laparoscopic ureterolithotomy) for comparative study. The operative details, hospital stay and complications were analysed. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent 64 laparoscopic procedures under single anaesthesia. The most common procedure in this series was laparoscopic adrenalectomy (n=34) followed by laparoscopic nephrectomy (n=13). Group 1 patients had a prolonged operative time ( P=0.012) and hospital stay ( P=0.025) when compared with group 1c. However, blood loss was comparable in both the groups. Patients in groups 2 and 3 had comparable operative times, blood loss and recovery period with respect to their controls. Intraoperatively, the end tidal carbon dioxide levels were within permissible limits. All procedures were completed using the laparoscopic approach, without any conversion. Conclusions: Simultaneous laparoscopic procedures can be done for urological diseases in selected patients with the advantages of single anaesthesia and hospital admission without increasing the morbidity

    Concomitant laparoscopic urological procedures: Does it contribute to morbidity?

    No full text
    Aim: With advancement in minimal access surgery two laparoscopic procedures can be combined together shortening the total hospital stay, decreasing morbidity and overall reduced cost. Combining two laparoscopic procedures in a single session has been reported in general surgery. Very few articles are available in literature with regard to combined urological laparoscopic surgeries. This article retrospectively analyses the outcomes of multiple laparoscopic procedures performed in a single stage at our centre. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing simultaneous procedures from May 2003 to Jan 2009 were included in the study. Patients were categorised into three groups according to the primary urological organ involved, for better comparison with the control group. Diseases involving the adrenals gland were grouped in (group 1), kidney (group 2) and renal collecting system/ureter (group 3). All patients had one urological procedure for either of the above-mentioned organs combined with another surgical procedure. Similarly three control groups were chosen according to the primary urological organ involved (group 1c- unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy, group 2c- unilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and group 3c- unilateral laparoscopic ureterolithotomy) for comparative study. The operative details, hospital stay and complications were analysed. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent 64 laparoscopic procedures under single anaesthesia. The most common procedure in this series was laparoscopic adrenalectomy (n=34) followed by laparoscopic nephrectomy (n=13). Group 1 patients had a prolonged operative time ( P=0.012) and hospital stay ( P=0.025) when compared with group 1c. However, blood loss was comparable in both the groups. Patients in groups 2 and 3 had comparable operative times, blood loss and recovery period with respect to their controls. Intraoperatively, the end tidal carbon dioxide levels were within permissible limits. All procedures were completed using the laparoscopic approach, without any conversion. Conclusions: Simultaneous laparoscopic procedures can be done for urological diseases in selected patients with the advantages of single anaesthesia and hospital admission without increasing the morbidity

    Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy is Feasible for Large Adrenal Masses > 6cm

    Get PDF
    Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the established procedure for adrenal masses less than 6 cm. The role of LA for large adrenal masses is well defined to a lesser extent. Methods: Thirty-six LAs were performed in 32 patients (including four patients with single stage bilateral adrenalectomies) over a period of 3 years, from May 2002 to 2005. Patients were divided into two groups based on the tumour size, i.e. masses less than 6 cm (group I) and masses 6 cm or more (group II). The results with respect to mean (95% confidence interval) operative time, blood loss, postoperative course and complications were compared. Results: Group II included 11 LAs performed in 10 patients including one bilateral LA for bilateral phaeochromocytomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A. The mean size (± standard deviation) of masses was 8 cm (± 1.47). In comparison, 22 patients in group I underwent 25 adrenalectomies (including three bilateral single stage procedures for Cushing's syndrome). The mean size of masses was 4.1 cm (± 1.27). There were eight and six phaeochromocytomas in groups I and II, respectively. By comparing groups I and II, only minimal increase in blood loss and operating time was noted with no significant difference in hospital stay and morbidity. Two cases required conversion to hand assistance towards the end of the procedure in view of their large size. Conclusion: LA is the procedure of choice for small adrenal masses but is also feasible for large functioning and nonfunctioning adrenal masses with equally good results. Even bilateral large functioning tumours can be treated safely by LA in a single stage when sufficient experience with the procedure is attained
    corecore