57 research outputs found
A Survey on the Ternary Purely Exponential Diophantine Equation
Let , , be fixed coprime positive integers with .
In this survey, we consider some unsolved problems and related works concerning
the positive integer solutions of the ternary purely exponential
diophantine equation
At most one solution to for some ranges of , ,
We consider the number of solutions in positive integers for the
purely exponential Diophantine equation (with ).
Apart from a list of known exceptions, a conjecture published in 2016 claims
that this equation has at most one solution in positive integers , , and
. We show that this is true for some ranges of , , , for instance,
when and . The conjecture also holds for small
pairs independent of , where with .
We show that the Pillai equation has at most one solution
(with a known list of exceptions) when . Finally, the
primitive case of the Je\'smanowicz conjecture holds when or when
. This work highlights the power of some ideas of Miyazaki and Pink
and the usefulness of a theorem by Scott
Number of solutions to , A Shorter Version
For relatively prime integers and both greater than one and odd
integer , there are at most two solutions in positive integers to
the equation . There are an infinite number of
giving exactly two solutions.Comment: added explanatory comments, fixed minor error
Two terms with known prime divisors adding to a power: REVISED
Let be a positive odd integer and a set of primes coprime with
. We consider equations in three integer unknowns , ,
, where , , and the primes dividing are precisely
those in . We consider , the number of solutions of such an equation.
Given a solution , let be the least positive integer such that
is an integer. Further, let be the number of distinct
primes dividing . Standard elementary approaches use an upper bound of
for the number of possible , and an upper bound of for the
number of ideal factorizations of in the field
which can correspond (in a standard designated way) to a solution in which
, and obtain . Here we
improve this by finding an inverse proportionality relationship between a bound
on the number of which can occur in solutions and a bound (independent of
) on the number of ideal factorizations of which can correspond to
solutions for a given . We obtain . The bound is precise
for : there are several cases with exactly solutions.Comment: revised and expanded version of a paper published in Publ. Math.
Debrecen, Vol. 93, issue 3-4, 2018, pp. 457-473 (2018
Smallest examples of strings of consecutive happy numbers
Abstract A happy number N is defined by the condition S n (N ) = 1 for some number n of iterations of the function S, where S(N ) is the sum of the squares of the digits of N . Up to 10 20 , the longest known string of consecutive happy numbers was length five. We find the smallest string of consecutive happy numbers of length 6, 7, 8, . . . , 13. For instance, the smallest string of six consecutive happy numbers begins with N = 7899999999999959999999996. We also find the smallest sequence of 3-consecutive cubic happy numbers of lengths 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9
- …