11 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
A multicentre study investigating vital sign changes occurring in complicated and uncomplicated transfusions
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Many hospitals require transfusions to be discontinued when vital signs stray from predetermined ranges, regardless of clinical symptoms. Variations in vital signs may be unrelated to transfusion, however, and needlessly stopping a transfusion may delay medical care while increasing donor exposures and healthcare costs. We hypothesized that a detailed study of vital sign changes associated with transfusion of blood product by component, including those associated with potential reactions (complicated) and those deemed to be uncomplicated, would establish a useful framework of reference for treating clinicians and transfusion services alike. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective electronic record review of transfusion service and transfusion recipient data was completed on 3852 inpatient transfusion episodes over a 6-month period at four academic tertiary care hospitals across the United States. Vital signs pre- and post-transfusion were recorded by trained clinical research nurses. Serious reactions were adjudicated by a panel of transfusion medicine experts. RESULTS:In both uncomplicated transfusions (n = 3765) and those including an adverse reaction (n = 87), vital sign fluctuations were generally modest. Compared to uncomplicated transfusions, transfusions complicated by febrile reactions were associated with higher pretransfusion temperature and higher pretransfusion pulse rates. Episodes of transfusion circulatory overload were associated with higher pretransfusion respiration rates compared to uncomplicated transfusions. CONCLUSION:Most transfusions are associated with only modest changes in vital signs. Pretransfusion vital signs may be an important yet previously understudied predictor of vital sign changes during transfusion. The optimal role of vital sign assessment during blood transfusion deserves further study
Recommended from our members
Equivalent inpatient mortality among direct-acting oral anticoagulant and warfarin users presenting with major hemorrhage
BackgroundExtrapolation of clinical trial results comparing warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users experiencing major hemorrhage to clinical care is challenging due to differences seen among non-randomized oral anticoagulant users, bleed location, and etiology. We hypothesized that inpatient all-cause-mortality among patients presenting with major hemorrhage differed based on the home-administered anticoagulant medication class, DOAC versus warfarin.MethodsMore than 1.5 million hospitalizations were screened and 3731 patients with major hemorrhage were identified in the REDS-III Recipient Database. Propensity score matching and stratification were used to account for potentially confounding factors.ResultsInpatient all-cause-mortality was lower for DOAC (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.45-0.80, p = 0.0005) before accounting for confounding and competing events. Inpatient all-cause-mortality for 1266 propensity-score-matched patients compared using proportional hazards regression did not differ (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.58-1.22, p = 0.36). Inpatient all-cause-mortality in stratified analyses (warfarin as reference) produced: HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.31-1.55) for traumatic head injuries; HR = 1.10 (95%CI 0.62-1.95) for non-traumatic head injuries; HR = 0.62 (95%CI 0.20-1.94) for traumatic, non-head injuries; and HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.29-1.63) for non-traumatic, non-head injuries. Mean time to discharge was shorter for DOAC (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05-1.30, p = 0.0034) in the propensity score matched analysis. Plasma transfusion occurred in 42% of warfarin hospitalizations and 11% of DOAC hospitalizations. Vitamin K was administered in 63% of warfarin hospitalizations.ConclusionsAfter accounting for differences in patient characteristics, location of bleed, and traumatic injury, inpatient survival was no different in patients presenting with major hemorrhage while on DOAC or warfarin
Recommended from our members
Equivalent inpatient mortality among direct-acting oral anticoagulant and warfarin users presenting with major hemorrhage
Extrapolation of clinical trial results comparing warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users experiencing major hemorrhage to clinical care is challenging due to differences seen among non-randomized oral anticoagulant users, bleed location, and etiology. We hypothesized that inpatient all-cause-mortality among patients presenting with major hemorrhage differed based on the home-administered anticoagulant medication class, DOAC versus warfarin.
More than 1.5 million hospitalizations were screened and 3731 patients with major hemorrhage were identified in the REDS-III Recipient Database. Propensity score matching and stratification were used to account for potentially confounding factors.
Inpatient all-cause-mortality was lower for DOAC (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.45–0.80, p = 0.0005) before accounting for confounding and competing events. Inpatient all-cause-mortality for 1266 propensity-score-matched patients compared using proportional hazards regression did not differ (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.58–1.22, p = 0.36). Inpatient all-cause-mortality in stratified analyses (warfarin as reference) produced: HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.31–1.55) for traumatic head injuries; HR = 1.10 (95%CI 0.62–1.95) for non-traumatic head injuries; HR = 0.62 (95%CI 0.20–1.94) for traumatic, non-head injuries; and HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.29–1.63) for non-traumatic, non-head injuries. Mean time to discharge was shorter for DOAC (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05–1.30, p = 0.0034) in the propensity score matched analysis. Plasma transfusion occurred in 42% of warfarin hospitalizations and 11% of DOAC hospitalizations. Vitamin K was administered in 63% of warfarin hospitalizations.
After accounting for differences in patient characteristics, location of bleed, and traumatic injury, inpatient survival was no different in patients presenting with major hemorrhage while on DOAC or warfarin.
•Studies of DOAC outcomes following major hemorrhage have bias, confounding, and competing events.•We compared DOAC and warfarin users with major hemorrhage accounting for these factors.•All-cause inpatient mortality was no different; hospital length of stay was shorter for DOAC.•Use of plasma and vitamin K was greater among warfarin users
Recommended from our members
Inpatient Mortality and Length of Stay Among Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) and Warfarin Users Presenting with Major Hemorrhage
Abstract
Background: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is increasingly common among patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease. Differences in the mechanisms of action as compared to warfarin could impact transfusion patterns and clinical outcomes in patients, especially for those presenting with major hemorrhage. The management of patients taking these newer medications and corresponding outcomes are relevant to optimizing clinical decision making in situations of major hemorrhage.
Methods: We tested the hypothesis that inpatient all-cause mortality among patients presenting with major hemorrhage differs based on the home-administered anticoagulant medication class (DOAC versus warfarin). A cohort of patients presenting to twelve US hospitals from 2013 to 2016 was identified using the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS)-III Recipient Database. Primary ICD diagnosis codes, issued blood products, laboratory data, and early mortality events were used in the application of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition of major hemorrhage. Exposure status was defined as a record of home-administered DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban; exposed) or warfarin (non-exposed). Patients with multiple encounters and those transferred into or out of network were excluded from the analysis. Proportional hazards regression was used to compare all-cause mortality and hospital length of stay. We then repeated the analysis using a cohort matched on propensity scores to account for confounding by age, gender, concurrent aspirin and anti-platelet use, liver and renal dysfunction, cancer, CHA2DS2-VASc score, traumatic injury, and hospital. We then repeated the propensity score matched analysis stratified by anatomic location of bleed and traumatic injury.
Results: More than 1.5 million hospitalizations were screened for eligibility. Exclusion of minors, outpatients, hospitalizations without a medication of interest, absence of major hemorrhage, multiple hospitalizations, and hospital transfers resulted in 3,731 patients available for the unadjusted analysis. Inpatient all-cause mortality was lower among DOAC users when the entire cohort was considered (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.45 - 0.80, p=0.0005). Implementation of propensity score matching to account for confounding abrogated this difference (HR=0.84, 95%CI 0.58 - 1.22, p=0.36). Time to hospital discharge was shorter for DOAC users (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 - 1.30, p=0.0034). Transfusion patterns were similar by medication, except for plasma transfusion occurring in 42% of warfarin encounters and 11% of DOAC encounters. Vitamin K was administered in 63% of warfarin encounters, whereas specific DOAC reversal agents were largely unavailable during the analysis period [used in 5 (1%) DOAC encounters]. There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient all-cause mortality in the stratified analysis (warfarin as reference): HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.31 - 1.55) for traumatic head injuries; HR = 1.10 (95%CI 0.62 - 1.95) for non-traumatic head injuries; HR = 0.62 (95%CI 0.20 - 1.94) for traumatic, non-head injuries; and HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.29 - 1.63) for non-traumatic, non-head injuries.
Conclusions: Analysis of a population taking oral anticoagulation and presenting with major hemorrhage showed that transfusion of plasma was more commonly employed to treat major hemorrhage among warfarin users than DOAC users. Inpatient all-cause mortality was lower among DOAC users in the overall cohort; however, accounting for potential confounding factors using propensity score matching abrogated this difference. Hospital length of stay was shorter for DOAC users compared to warfarin users. Stratification by location of bleed and traumatic injury did not alter these findings. Less plasma use and a shorter length of hospitalization in this study, combined with no observable difference in inpatient all-cause mortality, suggests that outcomes following major hemorrhage are at least no different for DOAC users as compared to warfarin users.
Disclosures
Mast: Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Kor:NIH: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; CSL Behring: Honoraria
Recommended from our members
The impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection on obstetric hemorrhage and blood transfusion in South Africa.
BackgroundGlobally, as in South Africa, obstetric hemorrhage (OH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Although blood transfusion is critical to OH management, the incidence and predictors of transfusion as well as their relation to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are poorly described.Study design and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted of all peripartum patients at four major hospitals in South Africa (April to July 2012). Comprehensive clinical data were collected on patients who sustained OH and/or were transfused. Logistic regression was used to model risk factors for OH and transfusion.ResultsA total of 15,725 peripartum women were evaluated, of whom 3969 (25.2%) were HIV positive. Overall, 387 (2.5%) women sustained OH and 438 (2.8%) received transfusions, including 213 (1.4%) women with both OH and transfusion. There was no significant difference in OH incidence between HIV-positive (2.8%) and HIV-negative (2.3%) patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.25). In contrast, the incidence of blood transfusion was significantly higher in HIV-positive (3.7%) than in HIV-negative (2.4%) patients (adjusted OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.03). Other risk factors for transfusion included OH, low prenatal hemoglobin, the treating hospital, lack of prenatal care, and gestational age of not more than 34 weeks.ConclusionIn the South African obstetric setting, the incidence of peripartum blood transfusion is significantly higher than in the United States and other high-income countries while OH incidence is similar. While OH and prenatal anemia are major predictors of transfusion, HIV infection is a common and independent contributing factor
Recommended from our members
The impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection on obstetric hemorrhage and blood transfusion in South Africa.
BackgroundGlobally, as in South Africa, obstetric hemorrhage (OH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Although blood transfusion is critical to OH management, the incidence and predictors of transfusion as well as their relation to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are poorly described.Study design and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted of all peripartum patients at four major hospitals in South Africa (April to July 2012). Comprehensive clinical data were collected on patients who sustained OH and/or were transfused. Logistic regression was used to model risk factors for OH and transfusion.ResultsA total of 15,725 peripartum women were evaluated, of whom 3969 (25.2%) were HIV positive. Overall, 387 (2.5%) women sustained OH and 438 (2.8%) received transfusions, including 213 (1.4%) women with both OH and transfusion. There was no significant difference in OH incidence between HIV-positive (2.8%) and HIV-negative (2.3%) patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.25). In contrast, the incidence of blood transfusion was significantly higher in HIV-positive (3.7%) than in HIV-negative (2.4%) patients (adjusted OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.03). Other risk factors for transfusion included OH, low prenatal hemoglobin, the treating hospital, lack of prenatal care, and gestational age of not more than 34 weeks.ConclusionIn the South African obstetric setting, the incidence of peripartum blood transfusion is significantly higher than in the United States and other high-income countries while OH incidence is similar. While OH and prenatal anemia are major predictors of transfusion, HIV infection is a common and independent contributing factor
Recommended from our members
Risk factors for peripartum blood transfusion in South Africa: a case‐control study
BackgroundObstetric hemorrhage (OH) and access to peripartum blood transfusion remains a global health challenge. The rates of peripartum transfusion in South Africa exceed those in high-income countries despite comparable rates of OH. We sought to evaluate factors associated with peripartum transfusion.Study design and methodsA case-control study was conducted at four large South African hospitals. Transfused peripartum women (cases) and nontransfused controls were stratum matched 1:2 by hospital and delivery date. Data on obstetric, transfusion, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) history were abstracted from medical records. Blood was obtained for laboratory evaluation. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for transfusion using logistic regression.ResultsA total of 1200 transfused cases and 2434 controls were evaluated. Antepartum hemorrhage (OR, 197.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 104.27-375.78), hemorrhage with vaginal delivery (OR, 136.46; 95% CI, 75.87-245.18), prenatal anemia (OR, 22.76; 95% CI, 12.34-41.93 for prenatal hemoglobin level < 7 g/dL), and failed access to prenatal care (OR, 6.71; 95% CI, 4.32-10.42) were the major risk factors for transfusion. Platelet (PLT) count (ORs, 4.10, 2.66, and 1.77 for ≤50 × 109 , 51 × 109 -100 × 109 , and 101 × 109 -150 × 109 cells/L, respectively), HIV infection (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.62), and admitting hospital (twofold variation) were also associated with transfusion. Mode of delivery, race, age category, gravidity, parity, gestational age, and birthweight were not independently associated with transfusion.ConclusionMajor risk factors of peripartum transfusion in South Africa, namely, prenatal anemia and access to prenatal care, may be amenable to intervention. HIV infection and moderately low PLT count are novel risk factors that merit further investigation
Use of an automated pyrosequencing technique for confirmation of sickle cell disease.
BackgroundThe diagnosis of sickle cell disease (SCD) is made by hemoglobin assays such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), isoelectric focusing and cellulose acetate or citrate agar electrophoresis. These assays are easy to perform and used in large-scale newborn screening in many countries. These tests however may not easily differentiate Sβ0 thalassemia from SS or identify other hemoglobin variants, and in this case, hemoglobin (HBB) gene sequencing may be necessary.ObjectivesTo develop a high throughput DNA based confirmatory assay for SCD and to detect mutations in the HBB gene.MethodsWe developed an automated pyrosequencing technique (PyS) based on QIAGEN technology (Hilden, Germany) to detect homozygous or heterozygous hemoglobin S mutations as well as hemoglobin C mutations. The technique was tested on 2,748 samples from patients enrolled in a multi-center SCD cohort in Brazil. Patients were previously tested using HPLC to diagnose SCD as part of routine clinical care. Any subjects with discrepant results between HPLC and PyS or with heterozygous hemoglobin S detected had Sanger sequencing of the HBB gene.ResultsWe identified 168 samples with discrepant results between HPLC and PyS and 100 with concordant PyS = heterozygous S and HPLC, which would suggest SB-thalassemia or other heterozygous S variants. The PyS assay correctly identified 1906 (98.7%) of the 1930 HbSS and 628 (98.7%) of the 636 HbSC samples. Of the 179 remaining samples, PyS correctly indicated S heterozygosis in 165 (92.2%). Of the 165 heterozygous S samples confirmed by Sanger as consistent with Sβ thalassemia genotype, 84 samples were classified as Sβ0 thalassemia and 81 as Sβ+ thalassemia. The most frequent beta thalassemia mutations of Sβ0 and Sβ+ were HBB: c.118C>T (Gln40Stop) and HBB c.92 + 6T> C, respectively.DiscussionThe PyS proved to be satisfactory for large-scale confirmatory testing of hemoglobin mutation. Moreover, with this study we were able to describe the most common β+ and β0 mutations in SCD patients with Sβ-thalassemia in a large multi-institutional SCD cohort in Brazil
Recommended from our members
Frequent blood donations alter susceptibility of red blood cells to storage‐ and stress‐induced hemolysis
BackgroundFrequent whole blood donations increase the prevalence of iron depletion in blood donors, which may subsequently interfere with normal erythropoiesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between donation frequency and red blood cell (RBC) storage stability in a racially/ethnically diverse population of blood donors.Study designLeukoreduced RBC concentrate-derived samples from 13,403 donors were stored for 39 to 42 days (1-6°C) and then evaluated for storage, osmotic, and oxidative hemolysis. Iron status was evaluated by plasma ferritin measurement and self-reported intake of iron supplements. Donation history in the prior 2 years was obtained for each subject.ResultsFrequent blood donors enrolled in this study were likely to be white, male, and of older age (56.1 ± 5.0 years). Prior donation intensity was negatively associated with oxidative hemolysis (p < 0.0001) in multivariate analyses correcting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Increased plasma ferritin concentration was associated with increased RBC susceptibility to each of the three measures of hemolysis (p < 0.0001 for all), whereas self-reported iron intake was associated with reduced susceptibility to osmotic and oxidative hemolysis (p < 0.0001 for both).ConclusionsFrequent blood donations may alter the quality of blood components by modulating RBC predisposition to hemolysis. RBCs collected from frequent donors with low ferritin have altered susceptibility to hemolysis. Thus, frequent donation and associated iron loss may alter the quality of stored RBC components collected from iron-deficient donors. Further investigation is necessary to assess posttransfusion safety and efficacy in patients receiving these RBC products