Transcriptional Stress Induces Chromatin Relocation of the Nucleotide Excision Repair Factor XPG.

Endonuclease XPG participates in nucleotide excision repair (NER), in basal transcription, and in the processing of RNA/DNA hybrids (R-loops): the malfunction of these processes may cause genome instability. Here, we investigate the chromatin association of XPG during basal transcription and after transcriptional stress. The inhibition of RNA polymerase II with 5,6-dichloro-l-β-D-ribofuranosyl benzimidazole (DRB), or actinomycin D (AD), and of topoisomerase I with camptothecin (CPT) resulted in an increase in chromatin-bound XPG, with concomitant relocation by forming nuclear clusters. The cotranscriptional activators p300 and CREB-binding protein (CREBBP), endowed with lysine acetyl transferase (KAT) activity, interact with and acetylate XPG. Depletion of both KATs by RNA interference, or chemical inhibition with C646, significantly reduced XPG acetylation. However, the loss of KAT activity also resulted in increased chromatin association and the relocation of XPG, indicating that these processes were induced by transcriptional stress and not by reduced acetylation. Transcription inhibitors, including C646, triggered the R-loop formation and phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γ-H2AX). Proximity ligation assay (PLA) showed that XPG colocalized with R-loops, indicating the recruitment of the protein to these structures. These results suggest that transcriptional stress-induced XPG relocation may represent recruitment to sites of R-loop processing

Interaction of p21CDKN1A with PCNA regulates the histone acetyltransferase activity of p300 in nucleotide excision repair

The cell-cycle inhibitor p21CDKN1A has been suggested to directly participate in DNA repair, thanks to the interaction with PCNA. Yet, its role has remained unclear. Among proteins interacting with both p21 and PCNA, the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) p300 has been shown to participate in DNA repair. Here we report evidence indicating that p21 protein localizes and interacts with both p300 and PCNA at UV-induced DNA damage sites. The interaction between p300 and PCNA is regulated in vivo by p21. Indeed, loss of p21, or its inability to bind PCNA, results in a prolonged binding to chromatin and an increased association of p300 with PCNA, in UV-irradiated cells. Concomitantly, HAT activity of p300 is reduced after DNA damage. In vitro experiments show that inhibition of p300 HAT activity induced by PCNA is relieved by p21, which disrupts the association between recombinant p300 and PCNA. These results indicate that p21 is required during DNA repair to regulate p300 HAT activity by disrupting its interaction with PCNA

Revisiting the Function of p21CDKN1A in DNA Repair: The Influence of Protein Interactions and Stability

The p21CDKN1A protein is an important player in the maintenance of genome stability through its function as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, leading to cell-cycle arrest after genotoxic damage. In the DNA damage response, p21 interacts with specific proteins to integrate cell-cycle arrest with processes such as transcription, apoptosis, DNA repair, and cell motility. By associating with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), the master of DNA replication, p21 is able to inhibit DNA synthesis. However, to avoid conflicts with this process, p21 protein levels are finely regulated by pathways of proteasomal degradation during the S phase, and in all the phases of the cell cycle, after DNA damage. Several lines of evidence have indicated that p21 is required for the efficient repair of different types of genotoxic lesions and, more recently, that p21 regulates DNA replication fork speed. Therefore, whether p21 is an inhibitor, or rather a regulator, of DNA replication and repair needs to be re-evaluated in light of these findings. In this review, we will discuss the lines of evidence describing how p21 is involved in DNA repair and will focus on the influence of protein interactions and p21 stability on the efficiency of DNA repair mechanisms

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen bound to DNA synthesis sites: phosphorylation and association with cyclin D1 and cyclin A.

Evidence is presented that association of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) with nuclear chromatin in human fibroblasts is related to the phosphorylation status of the protein. Using a hypotonic lysis procedure to extract the soluble form of PCNA, it has been shown that the remaining nuclear-bound form, predominantly in S-phase cells, is highly phosphorylated. Cells in early G1, or in G2 + M phases, contain basal levels of the bound form of the protein that is only weakly phosphorylated. Using fractionated immunoprecipitation techniques, PCNA was found to be associated with cyclin A in both soluble and insoluble fractions. In contrast, association of PCNA with cyclin D1 was found in the soluble fraction, while no detectable levels were present in the insoluble fraction. Immunofluorescence labeling and flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle distribution of cyclin D1 and cyclin A showed that, like PCNA, maximal levels of both proteins were bound to nuclear structures at the G1/S phase boundary. These results suggest that binding of PCNA to DNA synthesis sites occurs after phosphorylation. Association with cyclin D1 and cyclin A might occur in a macromolecular complex assembled at the G1/S phase boundary to drive activation of DNA replication factors

Exploring new potential role of DDB2 by host cell reactivation assay in human tumorigenic cells

Background: The Host Cell Reactivation assay (HCR) allows studying the DNA repair capability in different types of human cells. This assay was carried out to assess the ability in removing UV-lesions from DNA, thus verifying NER efficiency. Previously we have shown that DDB2, a protein involved in the Global Genome Repair, interacts directly with PCNA and, in human cells, the loss of this interaction affects DNA repair machinery. In addition, a mutant form unable to interact with PCNA (DDB2PCNA-), has shown a reduced ability to interact with a UV-damaged DNA plasmid in vitro. Methods: In this work, we have investigated whether DDB2 protein may influence the repair of a UV-damaged DNA plasmid into the cellular environment by applying the HCR method. To this end, human kidney 293 stable clones, expressing DDB2Wt or DDB2PCNA-, were co-transfected with pmRFP-N2 and UV-irradiated pEGFP-reported plasmids. Moreover, the co-localization between DDB2 proteins and different NER factors recruited at DNA damaged sites was analysed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Results: The results have shown that DDB2Wt recognize and repair the UV-induced lesions in plasmidic DNA transfected in the cells, whereas a delay in these processes were observed in the presence of DDB2PCNA-, as also confirmed by the different extent of co-localization of DDB2Wt and some NER proteins (such as XPG), vs the DDB2 mutant form. Conclusion: The HCR confirms itself as a very helpful approach to assess in the cellular context the effect of expressing mutant vs Wt NER proteins on the DNA damage response. Loss of interaction of DDB2 and PCNA affects negatively DNA repair efficiency

Single Cell Determination of7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine by FluorescenceTechniques: Antibody vs. Avidin Labeling

An important biomarker of oxidative damage in cellular DNA is the formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). Although several methods are available for the bio-chemical analysis of this molecule, its determination at the single cell level may provide significantadvantages when investigating the influence of cell heterogeneity and cell type in the DNA damageresponse. to. For this purpose, antibodies recognizing 8-oxodG are available; however, detectionwith the glycoprotein avidin has also been proposed because of a structural similarity between itsnatural ligand biotin and 8-oxodG. Whether the two procedures are equivalent in terms of reliabilityand sensitivity is not clear. In this study, we compared the immunofluorescence determination of8-oxodG in cellular DNA using the monoclonal antibody N45.1 and labeling using avidin conjugatedwith the fluorochrome Alexa Fluor488 (AF488). Oxidative DNA damage was induced in different celltypes by treatment with potassium bromate (KBrO3), a chemical inducer of reactive oxygen species(ROS). By using increasing concentrations of KBrO3, as well as different reaction conditions, ourresults indicate that the monoclonal antibody N45.1 provides a specificity of 8-oxodG labeling greaterthan that attained with avidin-AF488. These findings suggest that immunofluorescence techniquesare best suited to the in situ analysis of 8-oxodG as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage