15 research outputs found

    Photothermal Breaking of Emulsions Stabilized with Graphene

    No full text
    Pristine graphene particles prepared using an aqueous phase exfoliation technique have been used to promote the stabilization of emulsions through adsorption at the oil–water interface. Highly localized phase separation of these ultrastable emulsions could, however, be induced through photothermal heating of the graphene particles at the interface exposed to near-infrared light. The graphene wettability, which is a key determinant in preventing droplet coalescence was altered through the adsorption of nonionic block copolymer surfactants. Varying the aqueous solution conditions influenced the hydration of the hydrophilic component of the surfactant providing a further opportunity to alter the overall particle wettability and, hence, stability of the emulsion. In this way, highly stable-oil-in water emulsions were produced with decane; however, water-in-oil emulsions were formed with toluene as the oil phase

    Germline single nucleotide polymorphisms in <i>ERBB3</i> and <i>BARD1</i> genes result in a worse relapse free survival response for HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant based docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH)

    No full text
    <div><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths in women worldwide and is classified into subtypes based on the cancer’s receptor status. Of these subtypes, those expressing the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor were traditionally associated with poor prognosis. Several advances have been made in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, yet issues of resistance and poor response to therapy remains prevalent. In this study we explored the impact of HER-family and homologous recombination deficiency SNPs on response to patients who received TCH-based (docetaxel (T), carboplatin (C), and trastuzumab (H)) treatment versus those who received other treatment regimens. Using Cox regression analysis, we identified 6 SNPs that correlate with recurrence free survival in our patients and supported our findings using support vector machines. We also used reverse phase protein array analysis to examine the impact ERBB3 SNPs may have on both the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. Finally, using cell line models, we correlated SNP status with sensitivity to platinum based drugs and docetaxel. We found that patients on a TCH based regimen with the minor allele of the ERBB3 (rs2229046 and rs773123) and BARD1 (rs2070096) SNPs, were significantly more likely to relapse than those women who were not. Additionally, we observed that patients with these ERBB3 SNPs had shown elevated protein expression/phosphorylation of Src kinase, c-MET (Y1234/1235), GSK-3β (S9) and p27, indicating that these SNPs are associated with non-PI3K/AKT signaling. Finally, using cell line models, we demonstrate that the BARD1 SNP (rs2229571) is associated with greater sensitivity to both carboplatin and cisplatin. The BARD1 and ERBB3 SNPs can potentially be used to determine those patients that will have a worse response to TCH based treatment, an effect that may arise from the SNPs impact on altered cellular signaling.</p></div

    Germline single nucleotide polymorphisms in <i>ERBB3</i> and <i>BARD1</i> genes result in a worse relapse free survival response for HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant based docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) - Fig 3

    No full text
    <p>Reverse Phase Protein array analysis correlating differential expression and phosphorylation of proteins involved in either the A) AKT or B) MAPK pathway versus the presence or absence of the minor allele of the ERBB3 rs2229046 SNP. p-values <0.05 included on the graph demonstrate significantly differential protein expression between the presence of the reference allele or the presence of the minor allele and are corrected for multiple testing.</p

    The prognostic role of RNF8-T448T SNP in TCH versus non-TCH treated primary tumours (n = 157).

    No full text
    <p>The blue, red and green lines represent the samples with the wild type (reference), heterozygous and minor alleles respectively. Kaplan Meier estimates where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 12.42 (2.00–77.19) p = 0.01) in non-TCH treated patients versus no-significant impact in TCH treated patients.</p

    Analysis of the differential sensitivity of HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines to the platinum drugs cisplatin and carboplatin.

    No full text
    <p>We correlated the presence or absence of the minor allele of HER-family or BARD1 versus the GD<sub>50</sub> to either drug. GD<sub>50</sub> values were taken from the GDSC cell line analysis database [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0200996#pone.0200996.ref021" target="_blank">21</a>]. p-value of <0.05 indicates a significant p-value after multiple testing correction.</p

    Germline single nucleotide polymorphisms in <i>ERBB3</i> and <i>BARD1</i> genes result in a worse relapse free survival response for HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant based docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) - Fig 4

    No full text
    <p>Reverse Phase Protein array analysis correlating differential expression and phosphorylation of proteins involved in either the A) AKT or B) MAPK pathway versus the presence or absence of the minor allele of the ERBB3 rs773123 SNP. p-values <0.05 included on the graph demonstrate significantly differential protein expression between the presence of the reference allele or the presence of the minor allele and are corrected for multiple testing.</p

    The prognostic role of ERBB2, ERBB3 and BARD1 SNPs in TCH versus non-TCH treated primary tumours (n = 157).

    No full text
    <p>In each plot, the blue and red lines represent the samples with the wild type (reference) and heterozygous alleles respectively. Kaplan Meier estimates of (A) the ERBB2-rs1136201 SNP where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 2.67 (1.05–6.78), p = 0.05) in TCH treated patients versus no-significant impact in non-TCH treated patients, (B) the ERBB3 rs2229046 SNP, where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 4.95 (1.91–2.79), p = 1.51x10-3) in TCH treated patients versus no significant impact on non-TCH treated patients, (C) the ERBB3 rs773123 SNP, where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 2.67 (1.02–7.03), p = 0.05) in TCH treated patients versus no significant impact on non-TCH treated patients, and (D) the BARD1 rs2070096 SNP, where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 3.27 (1.16–9.17), p = 0.05) in TCH treated patients versus no significant impact in non-TCH treated patients. p-values <0.05 indicates a significant p-value after multiple testing correction.</p
    corecore