15 research outputs found

    Scanning electron microscope observation of the biomass accumulated on contraceptive vaginal rings used for three weeks.

    No full text
    <p>Pictures 1a-3a: The contraceptive vaginal ring was used by a woman with a Nugent score of 10 and with presence of <i>Lactobacillus iners</i>, <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> and <i>Atopobium vaginae</i> as measured by qPCR. A vaginal biofilm consisting of <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> and <i>Atopobium vaginae</i> was identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization. On the ring <i>Lactobacillus species</i>, <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> and <i>Atopobium vaginae</i> were detected using qPCR, the crystal violet optical density was 3.7555 Pictures 1b-3b: Biomass on a contraceptive vaginal ring after use by a woman with a Nugent score of 0 and presence of <i>Lactobacillus iners</i> only. No biofilm was visualized using fluorescence in situ hybridization. On the ring <i>Lactobacillus species</i> was detected using qPCR, the crystal violet optical density was 3.7225.</p

    Evolution over time of the mean vaginal Nugent score, the mean composite qPCR vaginal health score of vaginal specimens, and the mean composite qPCR vaginal health score of contraceptive vaginal ring biomass.

    No full text
    <p>The Y axis is a score from 0 to 10 for both the Nugent and the composite qPCR vaginal health score. RSV1: first ring removal visit; RSV2: second ring removal visit; LRV: last ring removal visit ____: mean Nugent score _ _ _: mean composite qPCR vaginal health score of the vaginal specimens ……: mean composite qPCR vaginal health score of the contraceptive vaginal rings The composite qPCR vaginal health score is calculated as log<sub>10</sub> (<i>Lactobacillus</i> spp.)-log<sub>10</sub> (<i>G</i>. <i>vaginalis</i>+ <i>A</i>. <i>vaginae</i>).</p

    Theoretical framework used for data collection and analysis as adapted from Van der Straten et al [38] and Merkatz et al [40].

    No full text
    <p>The framework proposed by van der Straten et al [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0199096#pone.0199096.ref035" target="_blank">35</a>] was used for data collection and analysis; elements of the NES/EE CVR acceptability model by Merkatz et al [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0199096#pone.0199096.ref037" target="_blank">37</a>] such as side effect and bodily changes were added.</p
    corecore