Metastatic pattern in adenocarcinoma of the lung An autopsy study from a cohort of 137 consecutive patients with complete resection

A cohort of 137 patients with completely resected stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the lung was observed from the time of operation; the metastatic pattern determined at autopsy is described in relation to clinical, histologic, and laboratory variables. The pretreatment variables evaluated were performance status, age, gender, lactate dehydrogenase, stage, degree of differentiation, and histologic subtype of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Patients who survived longer than 30 days after operation were eligible for analysis, and 35 autopsies were performed in this patient group (autopsy rate: 39.8%). The most common intrathoracic metastatic sites were mediastinal lymph nodes (43%), lung (31%), pleura (20%), pericardium (9%), and heart (6%). The most common extrathoracic sites were liver (37%), brain (33%), bones (21%), adrenals (17%), and kidneys (17%). Patients undergoing resection for stage I disease had significantly fewer intrathoracic metastases than patients with stage II disease (p = 0.01). Patients who survived less than 1 year had significantly more extrathoracic metastases than patients who survived for a longer period (p = 0.01). Patients with highly differentiated tumors had fewer extrathoracic metastases than patients with less differentiated tumors. No other statistically significant differences were observed. Overall, patients with stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung had better local control of the disease at autopsy than those with stage 11 disease, but distant metastases are a large problem despite the favorable prognosis of this patient group. The extrathoracic metastatic potential was greatest for less differentiated tumors. An active adjuvant systemic therapy after resection is needed in selected patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas of the lung, even in those with stage I disease

Benefit of respiratory gating in the Danish Breast Cancer Group partial breast irradiation trial

Background and purpose: Partial breast irradiation (PBI)has beenthe Danish Breast Cancer Group(DBCG) standard for selected breast cancer patients since 2016 based onearlyresults from the DBCG PBI trial.During trial accrual, respiratory-gated radiotherapy was introduced in Denmark. This study aims to investigate the effect of respiratory-gating on mean heart dose (MHD).Patients and methods: From 2009 to 2016 the DBCG PBI trial included 230 patientswith left-sided breast cancer receiving external beam PBI, 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks.Localization of the tumor bed on the planning CT scan, the use of respiratory-gating, coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), and doses to organs at risk were collected.Results: Respiratory-gating was used in 123 patients (53 %). In 176 patients (77 %) the tumor bed was in the upper and in 54 patients (23 %) in the lower breast quadrants. The median MHD was 0.37 Gy (interquartile range 0.26-0.57 Gy), 0.33 Gy (0.23-0.49 Gy) for respiratory-gating, and 0.49 Gy (0.31-0.70 Gy) for free breathing, p < 0.0001. MHD was < 1 Gy in 206 patients (90 %) and < 2 Gy in 221 patients (96 %). Respiratory-gating led to significantly lower MHD for upper-located, but not for lower-located tumor beds, however, all MHD were low irrespective of respiratory-gating. Respiratory-gating did not improve CTV coverage or lower lung doses.Conclusions: PBI ensured a low MHD for most patients. Adding respiratory-gating further reduced MHD for upper-located but not for lower-located tumor beds but did not influence target coverage or lung doses. Respiratory-gating is no longer DBCG standard for left-sided PBI

The NAME trial:a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients