26 reprogramming of two somatic nuclei in the same mouse ooplasm leads to pluripotent not totipotent embryos

The use of cloned embryos to derive pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESC) has raised expectations among many for its potential to benefit regenerative medicine. However, diploid cloned embryos also have the ability for totipotency and they occasionally develop to term. Thus, a therapeutic application cannot be kept totally separate from reproductive cloning. In contrast to diploidy, tetraploidy is incompatible with full development in mammals; yet, tetraploid cells arise after normal diploid development and contribute to certain organs of the adult body. In this context, we asked if single oocytes are able to reprogram 2 simultaneously transplanted somatic nuclei, and whether resultant embryos may serve as a source for functional pluripotent cell lines. We modified the conventional nuclear cloning method by simultaneously injecting 2 nuclei of cumulus cells into a single ooplasm of the B6C3F1 mouse strain. Following activation of these reconstructed oocytes, the blastocyst rates were lower compared with conventional cloned embryos (1 nucleus injection), but similar to tetraploid fertilized embryos generated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of 2 sperm heads and prevention of second polar body extrusion using cytochalasin B. Upon transfer of tetraploid cloned blastocysts to pseudopregnant recipients, no fetuses were found at midgestation (Table 1). Tetraploid cloned blastocysts supported the derivation of ESC (Table 1), which maintain a stable tetraploid karyotype over more than 20 passages. These tetraploid ESC possess the major hallmarks of pluripotency, including matching gene expression profiles (MouseRef-8 v2 expression BeadChip, Illumina) compared with those of diploid counterparts (>99% similarity) as well as the ability to differentiate into derivatives of the 3 germ layers when forming teratomas in severe-combined immunodeficient mice. Upon injection into wild-type blastocysts, tetraploid ESC populated the inner cell mass; however, after transfer of these chimeras to pseudopregnant recipients, derivatives of tetraploid ESC were found only in extraembryonic tissues of midgestation fetuses. In sum, we have shown that the reprogramming capacity of mouse oocytes is sufficient for 2 somatic nuclei, and that resultant cloned embryos support pluripotency but not totipotency. Our approach to therapeutic cloning is free of reproductive implications

Linking human Dead end 1 (DND1) variants to male infertility employing zebrafish embryos.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the vertebrate protein Dead end (DND1) a causative factor for human infertility and can novel in vivo assays in zebrafish help in evaluating this? SUMMARY ANSWER: Combining patient genetic data with functional in vivo assays in zebrafish reveals a possible role for DND1 in human male fertility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: About 7% of the male population is affected by infertility but linking specific gene variants to the disease is challenging. The function of the DND1 protein was shown to be critical for germ cell development in several model organisms but a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating the activity of the protein in the context of human male infertility is still missing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Exome data from 1305 men included in the Male Reproductive Genomics cohort were examined in this study. A total of 1114 of the patients showed severely impaired spermatogenesis but were otherwise healthy. Eighty-five men with intact spermatogenesis were included in the study as controls. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We screened the human exome data for rare, stop-gain, frameshift, splice site, as well as missense variants in DND1. The results were validated by Sanger sequencing. Immunohistochemical techniques and, when possible, segregation analyses were performed for patients with identified DND1 variants. The amino acid exchange in the human variant was mimicked at the corresponding site of the zebrafish protein. Using different aspects of germline development in live zebrafish embryos as biological assays, we examined the activity level of these DND1 protein variants. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In human exome sequencing data, we identified four heterozygous variants in DND1 (three missense and one frameshift variant) in five unrelated patients. The function of all of the variants was examined in the zebrafish and one of those was studied in more depth in this model. We demonstrate the use of zebrafish assays as a rapid and effective biological readout for evaluating the possible impact of multiple gene variants on male fertility. This in vivo approach allowed us to assess the direct impact of the variants on germ cell function in the context of the native germline. Focusing on the DND1 gene, we find that zebrafish germ cells, expressing orthologs of DND1 variants identified in infertile men, failed to arrive correctly at the position where the gonad develops and exhibited defects in cell fate maintenance. Importantly, our analysis facilitated the evaluation of single nucleotide variants, whose impact on protein function is difficult to predict, and allowed us to distinguish variants that do not affect the protein's activity from those that strongly reduce it and could thus potentially be the primary cause for the pathological condition. These aberrations in germline development resemble the testicular phenotype of azoospermic patients. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The pipeline we present requires access to zebrafish embryos and to basic imaging equipment. The notion that the activity of the protein in the zebrafish-based assays is relevant for the human homolog is well supported by previous knowledge. Nevertheless, the human protein may differ in some respects from its homologue in zebrafish. Thus, the assay should be considered only one of the parameters used in defining DND1 variants as causative or non-causative for infertility. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Using DND1 as an example, we have shown that the approach described in this study, relying on bridging between clinical findings and fundamental cell biology, can help to establish links between novel human disease candidate genes and fertility. In particular, the power of the approach we developed is manifested by the fact that it allows the identification of DND1 variants that arose de novo. The strategy presented here can be applied to different genes in other disease contexts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the German Research Foundation, Clinical Research Unit, CRU326 'Male Germ Cells'. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A

Long-term safety and efficacy of tezacaftor–ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years or older who are homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR (EXTEND): an open-label extension study

Background Tezacaftor–ivacaftor is an approved cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator shown to be efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated over 8–24 weeks in phase 3 clinical studies in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation (F/F; study 661-106 [EVOLVE]) or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation (F/RF; study 661-108 [EXPAND]). Longer-term (>24 weeks) safety and efficacy of tezacaftor–ivacaftor has not been assessed in clinical studies. Here, we present results of study 661-110 (EXTEND), a 96-week open-label extension study that assessed long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tezacaftor–ivacaftor in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis who were homozygous or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation. Methods Study 661-110 was a 96-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label study at 170 clinical research sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, and North America. Participants were aged 12 years or older, had cystic fibrosis, were homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR, and completed one of six parent studies of tezacaftor–ivacaftor: studies 661-103, 661-106, 661-107, 661-108, 661-109, and 661-111. Participants received oral tezacaftor 100 mg once daily and oral ivacaftor 150 mg once every 12 h for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were changes in lung function, nutritional parameters, and respiratory symptom scores; pulmonary exacerbations; and pharmacokinetic parameters. A post-hoc analysis assessed the rate of lung function decline in F/F participants who received up to 120 weeks of tezacaftor–ivacaftor in studies 661-106 (F/F) and/or 661-110 compared with a matched cohort of CFTR modulator-untreated historical F/F controls from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Primary safety analyses were done in all participants from all six parent studies who received at least one dose of study drug during this study. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02565914). Findings Between Aug 31, 2015, to May 31, 2019, 1044 participants were enrolled in study 661-110 from the six parent studies of whom 1042 participants received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the safety set. 995 (95%) participants had at least one TEAE; 22 (2%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation; and 351 (34%) had serious TEAEs. No deaths occurred during the treatment-emergent period; after the treatment-emergent period, two deaths occurred, which were both deemed unrelated to study drug. F/F (106/110; n=459) and F/RF (108/110; n=226) participants beginning tezacaftor–ivacaftor in study 661-110 had improvements in efficacy endpoints consistent with parent studies; improvements in lung function and nutritional parameters and reductions in pulmonary exacerbations observed in the tezacaftor–ivacaftor groups in the parent studies were generally maintained in study 661-110 for an additional 96 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were also similar to those in the parent studies. The annualised rate of lung function decline was 61·5% (95% CI 35·8 to 86·1) lower in tezacaftor–ivacaftor-treated F/F participants versus untreated matched historical controls. Interpretation Tezacaftor–ivacaftor was generally safe, well tolerated, and efficacious for up to 120 weeks, and the safety profile of tezacaftor–ivacaftor in study 661-110 was consistent with cystic fibrosis manifestations and with the safety profiles of the parent studies. The rate of lung function decline was significantly reduced in F/F participants, consistent with cystic fibrosis disease modification. Our results support the clinical benefit of long-term tezacaftor–ivacaftor treatment for people aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis with F/F or F/RF genotypes. Funding Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated