10 research outputs found

    Size and age at sex change.

    No full text
    <p>Frequency distributions of age (a, b) and standard length (c, d) at sex-change to males (determined from check marks) compared to the distributions of male <i>Halichoeres miniatus</i> at collection from (a, c) Orpheus Island and (b, d) Lizard Island. Age and size distributions of males at collection shown in grey, while age and back-calculated size distributions at sex change (from the otolith check marks) are displayed in white.</p

    Growth of males and females by location.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of mean daily increment widths of male (i.e. females that changed sex to males; black) and female (i.e. non-sex changing fish; grey) <i>Halichoeres miniatus</i> collected from (a) Orpheus Island (n = 18 males, 48 females) (b) and Lizard Island (n = 16 males, 23 females). Mean standard errors are inset.</p

    Comparison of males and female encounter rates between locations.

    No full text
    <p>Frequency of encounters per minute (± SE) for <i>Halichoeres miniatus</i> at Orpheus Island (grey) and Lizard Island (white) sampling locations. Based on the 15 min observations of 7 males and 7 females at each location.</p

    Comparison of sex-related size and age distributions.

    No full text
    <p>Size (a, c) and age (b, d) distributions for two populations of <i>Halichoeres miniatus</i> at Orpheus Island (a, b) and Lizard Island (c, d). Females are shown as white bars and males as grey.</p

    Dichotomous social systems (pair bonding vs. solitary living) among individuals of <i>Chaetodon lunulatus</i> and among species of <i>Chaetodon</i> at Lizard Island (current study) do not co-vary with other attributes (previously established), controlling for these variables while comparatively studying pair bonding.

    No full text
    <p>Phylogeny data sourced from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194465#pone.0194465.ref061" target="_blank">61</a>], where species clades (CH) and ancestral state nodes and probabilities (in parentheses) are shown. <i>Notes</i>: † = current study. *Parental care is unstudied in Lizard Island populations and is presumed absent based on unequivocal reporting of pelagic spawning within Chaetodontidae. ^Mating systems of these populations at Lizard Island are presumed based on reports at other locations [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194465#pone.0194465.ref063" target="_blank">63</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194465#pone.0194465.ref087" target="_blank">87</a>].</p

    Ancestral reconstruction of social behavior in the family Chaetodontidae summarized on a published maximum clade credibility chronogram [61].

    No full text
    <p>Pie charts at nodes represent the posterior probabilities of state reconstructions, summarized from 10,000 stochastic character maps across 1000 randomly sampled topologies from the BEAST posterior distribution of trees [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194465#pone.0194465.ref061" target="_blank">61</a>]. Within the family, pairing is reconstructed as the ancestral character with several subsequent independent transitions to solitary behavior or gregarious grouping and few reversals to pairing (inset). Within the study group (highlighted in blue for solitary and pink for pairing), pairing is ancestral, with one potential origin of solitary sociality in the common ancestor to <i>C</i>. <i>trifascialis</i>, <i>C rainfordi</i>, and <i>C</i>. <i>plebeius</i>. Time axis is in millions of years before present with major epochs identified (P: Pleistocene to Recent epoch).</p

    Differences in social behaviors between predominantly paired and solitary grouped <i>Chaetodon</i> spp. and <i>C</i>. <i>lunulatus</i> individuals.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Time spent proximate swimming with another conspecific (mean % ± standard error). (B) Time spent parallel swimming with another conspecific (mean % ± standard error). (C) Agonism towards partner vs. non-partner conspecifics among pairs (mean % ± standard error). (D) Percentage of pairs displaying partner fidelity after six weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between groups. N/A = not applicable.</p
    corecore