Appendix D. The effect of endophyte infection on the ratio of herbivore to natural enemy individuals.

The effect of endophyte infection on the ratio of herbivore to natural enemy individuals

Appendix E. Significant rarefaction curves for differences in species richness of total arthropods, parasites, natural enemies (predators and parasites), omnivores, and detrivores on plants infected or uninfected with the Neotyphodium endophyte over the four sampling periods of the study.

Significant rarefaction curves for differences in species richness of total arthropods, parasites, natural enemies (predators and parasites), omnivores, and detrivores on plants infected or uninfected with the Neotyphodium endophyte over the four sampling periods of the study

Appendix A. Arthropod taxa collected from Arizona fescue during the course of the study.

Arthropod taxa collected from Arizona fescue during the course of the study

Appendix C. The effect of soil moisture treatments on the number of predator and detritivore individuals.

The effect of soil moisture treatments on the number of predator and detritivore individuals

Appendix A. Experimental setup, winter temperature data, full ANOVA tables, and a list of identified arthropods and their feeding guilds.

Experimental setup, winter temperature data, full ANOVA tables, and a list of identified arthropods and their feeding guilds

Growth and reproduction of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue from different origins.

<p>Biomass (x±S.E.) and number of flowerheads (x±S.E.) of endophyte free (E-), endophyte infected (E+) and manipulatively endophyte free (ME-) tall fescue plants in Finland and Kentucky field experiments in years 2005 and 2006. Plants were collected from wild populations in Europe (A = island of Åland, G = Island of Gotland, S = coastal Sweden) or were cultivars from Europe (Retu) or USA (KY-31).</p

Linear mixed models for tall fescue flowerheads in Finland and Kentucky experiments in years 2005 and 2006.

<p>Linear mixed models for tall fescue flowerheads in Finland and Kentucky experiments in years 2005 and 2006.</p

Effects of nutrient and water treatments, and plant origin on tall fescue reproduction.

<p>Model-based estimated means of treatments (C = control, W = water treatment, N = nutrient treatment, WN = water and nutrient treatment) and three wild populations and two cultivars (A = Åland island, G = Gotland island, S = coastal Sweden, KY-31 = cultivar ‘Kentucky-31’, Retu = cultivar ‘Retu’) for number of tall fescue flowerheads in Finland and Kentucky experiments in the two study years, 2005 and 2006.</p

Effects of nutrient and water treatments, and plant origin on tall fescue growth.

<p>Model-based estimates for biomass (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157382#pone.0157382.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> for model) on treatments (C = control, W = water treatment, N = nutrient treatment, WN = water and nutrient treatment) and three wild populations and two cultivars (A = Åland island, G = Gotland island, S = coastal Sweden, KY-31 = cultivar ‘Kentucky 31’, Retu = cultivar ‘Retu’) for tall fescue biomass in Finland and Kentucky experiments in the two study years, 2005 and 2006.</p

Growth and reproduction of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue in different environmental conditions.

<p>Biomass (x±S.E.) and number of flowerheads (x±S.E.) of endophyte free (E-), endophyte infected (E+) and manipulatively endophyte free (ME-) tall fescue plants in Finland and Kentucky field experiments in years 2005 and 2006. The plants received either only ambient rain (C) or water (W), nutrient (N) and combined water and nutrient (WN) treatments.</p