23 research outputs found

    NATO revolution in the Polish military cartography

    No full text
    The article presents a review of contemporary Polish military topographic maps, with special focus on those in the scale of 1:50,000. They are basic maps used in all armies of NATO countries at tactical stages. After the political breakthrough of 1989 Polish political elites saw the future of our country in the structures of Western Europe, but the Warsaw Pact still existed, and Soviet Army units were stationed in Poland and in the German Democratic Republic. All the Warsaw Pact countries used maps in the “1942” coordinate system and followed standardized rules of map elaboration. The article presents transformation of those maps into NATO standards, the first stage of which was elaboration of the, so-called, maps adapted to NATO standards. At the end of 1990s there started elaboration of a new topographic map of Poland in the scale of 1:50,000. The project involved preparation of a level 2 map, in NATO nomenclature known as VMap Level 2, and simultaneously using the same base for to generate 580 sheets of a paper map in 1:50,000. Map elaboration finished in 2006 and in the following years the project was enhanced with publication of new maps based on high-resolution image data. Since 2003 Polish cartographers have been participating in Multinational Geospatial Co-production Program (MGCP). Within the program high-resolution vector data is being prepared for selected areas of interest. They are mainly areas of current or potential military conflict, terrorist threat, ethnic or religious conflict, natural disaster, etc. MGCP data is not a ready product meant for direct usage, and without proper preparation it is simply unreadable. Therefore, special computer applications were developed to facilitate fast preparation of topographic maps in 1:50,000: MGCP Derived Graphic (MDG) and lately MGCP Topographic Map (MTM). Such maps differ from Polish topographic maps both in contents (to a lesser extent) and in graphic form (to a larger extent). They contain less objects, but include aerial information

    Optimizing the stacking sequence in dual-purpose body armors

    Get PDF
    Many police body armor systems are dual purpose, offering both ballistic and knife resistanceby combining a flexible ballistic textile pack with a stiffer knife resistant layer.The two types of protection differ in materials and mechanisms such that each individualcomponent may help or interfere with the function of the other. This paper investigatesthe effect on knife and ballistic penetration resistance when a single thin metal plate wasplaced at various different positions within an aramid textile armor pack. Two metalliclayers were used: aluminum 7075 and commercial purity titanium; these had similarareal densities and were positioned in the front, middle, and back of a 20 layer pack ofwoven KevlarVR 49. An instrumented drop weight machine was used to deliver a repeatableknife blade impact at comparable energy levels to those specified in the UK HomeOffice test standards for knife resistance. Ballistic tests were used to determine the V50ballistic limit velocity against typical 9mm and 0.357 Magnum handgun threats. Againsta stabbing threat, it was found that positioning the metal plate in the middle of the packprovided the greatest resistance to knife penetration by a factor of almost two, while aplate at the front of the pack provided less resistance and plates positioned at the rear ofthe pack provided the least resistance to penetration. Against the ballistic threat, the penetrationresistance of the textile pack can be significantly improved when a metal plate isat the front of the pack, while for all other positions the effect is negligible. However, thiseffect is sensitive to both the ammunition type and the metal plate composition. When themetal plate is positioned at the rear of the pack there is a significant decrease in theback-face deformation of the armor pack although, again, this effect is only present forcertain ammunition and metal combinations. The overall effect of combining soft andhard elements was that specific performance parameters could be substantially increasedby the correct combination. There were no significant negative effects, however, in anumber of cases, the combined systems performance was no greater than that of a singleelement type, despite the added weight
    corecore