3 research outputs found

    Comparison of two computer codes for crack growth analysis: NASCRAC versus NASA/FLAGRO

    Get PDF
    The service life calculations of two computer codes, NASCRAC and NASA/FLAGRO, are compared. The analysis technique is based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), in which stresses remain below the yield strength of an elastic/plastic material. To perform service life calculations, a relationship expressing incremental crack growth, DA/DN, as a function of loading, geometry, and material properties is necessary. Load and geometry are expressed in terms of the cyclic stress intensity factor, delta K. The crack growth rate as a function of delta K is then determined by material tests, plotting DA/DN versus delta K for the given material, loading condition, and environment. Crack growth rate equations such as the Paris, Walker, and modified Forman equations are used to obtain a best fit curve to the laboratory DA/DN versus delta K data

    Meteoroid Risk Assessment of Lunar Habitat Concepts

    Get PDF
    Preliminary analyses have been performed of meteoroid impacts on lunar surface structures built with elements made from in situ materials. The SPHC hydrodynamic code was used to simulate impacts, and was validated against hypervelocity impact test results. Impact risk will affect necessary wall thicknesses, depth of burial, and placement of lunar base structures

    Comparison of SPHC Hydrocode Results with Penetration Equations and Results of Other Codes

    No full text
    The SPHC hydrodynamic code was used to simulate impacts of spherical aluminum projectiles on a single-wall aluminum plate and on a generic Whipple shield. Simulations were carried out in two and three dimensions. Projectile speeds ranged from 2 kilometers per second to 10 kilometers per second for the single-wall runs, and from 3 kilometers per second to 40 kilometers per second for the Whipple shield runs. Spallation limit results of the single-wall simulations are compared with predictions from five standard penetration equations, and are shown to fall comfortably within the envelope of these analytical relations. Ballistic limit results of the Whipple shield simulations are compared with results from the AUTODYN-2D and PAM-SHOCK-3D codes presented in a paper at the Hypervelocity Impact Symposium 2000 and the Christiansen formulation of 2003
    corecore