45 research outputs found
18S rRNA is a reliable normalisation gene for real time PCR based on influenza virus infected cells
Background: One requisite of quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) is to normalise the data with an
internal reference gene that is invariant regardless of treatment, such as virus infection. Several studies have found
variability in the expression of commonly used housekeeping genes, such as beta-actin (ACTB) and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), under different experimental settings. However, ACTB and
GAPDH remain widely used in the studies of host gene response to virus infections, including influenza viruses. To
date no detailed study has been described that compares the suitability of commonly used housekeeping genes in
influenza virus infections. The present study evaluated several commonly used housekeeping genes [ACTB, GAPDH,
18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA), ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide (ATP5B)
and ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit C1 (subunit 9) (ATP5G1)] to identify the most
stably expressed gene in human, pig, chicken and duck cells infected with a range of influenza A virus subtypes.
Results: The relative expression stability of commonly used housekeeping genes were determined in primary
human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs), pig tracheal epithelial cells (PTECs), and chicken and duck primary
lung-derived cells infected with five influenza A virus subtypes. Analysis of qRT-PCR data from virus and mock
infected cells using NormFinder and BestKeeper software programmes found that 18S rRNA was the most stable
gene in HBECs, PTECs and avian lung cells.
Conclusions: Based on the presented data from cell culture models (HBECs, PTECs, chicken and duck lung cells)
infected with a range of influenza viruses, we found that 18S rRNA is the most stable reference gene for normalising
qRT-PCR data. Expression levels of the other housekeeping genes evaluated in this study (including ACTB and
GPADH) were highly affected by influenza virus infection and hence are not reliable as reference genes for RNA
normalisation
Morphing in nature and beyond: a review of natural and synthetic shape-changing materials and mechanisms
Shape-changing materials open an entirely new solution space for a wide range of disciplines: from architecture that responds to the environment and medical devices that unpack inside the body, to passive sensors and novel robotic actuators. While synthetic shape-changing materials are still in their infancy, studies of biological morphing materials have revealed key paradigms and features which underlie efficient natural shape-change. Here, we review some of these insights and how they have been, or may be, translated to artificial solutions. We focus on soft matter due to its prevalence in nature, compatibility with users and potential for novel design. Initially, we review examples of natural shape-changing materials—skeletal muscle, tendons and plant tissues—and compare with synthetic examples with similar methods of operation. Stimuli to motion are outlined in general principle, with examples of their use and potential in manufactured systems. Anisotropy is identified as a crucial element in directing shape-change to fulfil designed tasks, and some manufacturing routes to its achievement are highlighted. We conclude with potential directions for future work, including the simultaneous development of materials and manufacturing techniques and the hierarchical combination of effects at multiple length scales.</p