Intimacy and Sexuality: Toward a Lifespan Perspective

While the marketplace for sex-related goods and services, including drugs to remedy sexual dysfunction or enhance sexual experience, appears to be expanding exponentially, sexuality and intimacy are poorly understood aspects of human life and health. At some point, most adults experience sexual problems, concerns, or dysfunction, but physicians and other health care providers are poorly equipped to elicit discussion of or to treat these problems. Furthermore, social, cultural, and religious traditions largely exert negative influence on an individual's capacity for sexual self-knowledge and communication about sexual concerns. Ageist attitudes and overlapping health concerns further divert awareness and attention from sexual issues and exacerbate the problem for older adults. Physicians, the public, and policymakers alike assume that sexual expression and function inevitably wane and deteriorate with age. Even when sexual problems are anticipated or correctly diagnosed, a paucity of effective therapies prohibits treatment. To address these problems, a small consensus workshop of leading researchers on sexuality, intimacy, and aging was convened to review and evaluate current data on:sexuality and intimacy as part of a healthy lifestyle throughout lifecauses and impact of problems relating to sexuality and intimacypharmaceutical and other therapeutic interventions The workshop aimed to identify research gaps and disagreement about current data, to construct a research agenda for future work, and to make recommendations in order to assist individuals in maintaining a healthy sexual and intimate life into their later years

Sexuality and Cognitive Status: A U.S. Nationally Representative Study of Home‐Dwelling Older Adults

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146357/1/jgs15511.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146357/2/jgs15511_am.pd

CommunityRx, a social care assistance intervention for family and friend caregivers delivered at the point of care: Two concurrent blinded randomized controlled trials

Background: CommunityRx is an evidence-based social care intervention delivered to family and friend caregivers (“caregivers”) at the point of healthcare to address health-related social risks (HRSRs). Two CommunityRx randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are being fielded concurrently on Chicago’s South Side, a predominantly African American/Black community. CommunityRx-Hunger is a double-blind RCT enrolling caregivers of hospitalized children. CommunityRx-Dementia is a single-blind RCT enrolling caregivers of community-residing people with dementia. RCTs with caregivers face recruitment barriers, including caregiver burden and lack of systematic strategies to identify caregivers in clinical settings. COVID-19 pandemic-related visitor restrictions exacerbated these barriers and prompted the need for iteration of the protocols from in-person to remote operations. This study describes these protocols and methods used for successful iteration to overcome barriers. Methods and findings: CommunityRx uses individual-level data to generate personalized, local community resource referrals for basic, health and caregiving needs. In early 2020, two in-person RCT protocols were pre-tested. In March 2020, when pandemic conditions prohibited face-to-face clinical enrollment, both protocols were iterated to efficient, caregiver-centered remote operations. Iterations were enabled in part by the Automated Randomized Controlled Trial Information-Communication System (ARCTICS), a trial management system innovation engineered to integrate the data collection database (REDCap) with community resource referral (NowPow) and SMS texting (Mosio) platforms. Enabled by engaged Community Advisory Boards and ARCTICS, both RCTs quickly adapted to remote operations. To accommodate these adaptations, launch was delayed until November (CommunityRx-Hunger) and December (CommunityRx-Dementia) 2020. Despite the delay, 65% of all planned participants (CommunityRx-Hunger n = 417/640; CommunityRx-Dementia n = 222/344) were enrolled by December 2021, halfway through our projected enrollment timeline. Both trials enrolled 13% more participants in the first 12 months than originally projected for in-person enrollment. Discussion: Our asset-based, community-engaged approach combined with widely accessible institutional and commercial information technologies facilitated rapid migration of in-person trials to remote operations. Remote or hybrid RCT designs for social care interventions may be a viable, scalable alternative to in-person recruitment and intervention delivery protocols, particularly for caregivers and other groups that are under-represented in traditional health services research. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: CommunityRx-Hunger (NCT04171999, 11/21/2019); CommunityRx for Caregivers (NCT04146545, 10/31/2019).</p

Why Add "Abolition" to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Social Care Framework?

Abundant evidence demonstrates that enduring, endemic racism plays an important role in determining patient health. This commentary reviews a patient case about disease self-management and subsequent health outcomes that are shaped by social and economic circumstances. We analyze the case using a framework for social care developed in 2019 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). We then propose that the NASEM framework be adapted by adding the category abolition, which could make the other social care practices transformative for historically marginalized populations

Neighborhood crime and access to health-enabling resources in Chicago

Neighborhood crime may be an important social determinant of health in many high-poverty, urban communities, yet little is known about its relationship with access to health-enabling resources. We recruited an address-based probability sample of 267 participants (ages ≥35 years) on Chicago's South Side between 2012 and 2013. Participants were queried about their perceptions of neighborhood safety and prior experiences of neighborhood crime. Survey data were paired to a comprehensive, directly-observed census of the built environment on the South Side of Chicago. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine access to health-enabling resources (potential and realized access) as a function of neighborhood crime (self-reported neighborhood safety and prior experience of theft or property crime), adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported health status. Low potential access was defined as a resident having nearest resources >1 mile from home; poor realized access was defined as bypassing nearby potential resources to use resources >1 mile from home. Poor neighborhood safety was associated with low potential access to large grocery stores (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.04, 2.87), pharmacies (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.33, 3.77), and fitness resources (AOR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.15, 3.24), but not small grocery stores. Any prior experience of neighborhood crime was associated with higher adjusted odds of bypassing nearby pharmacies (AOR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.11, 12.87). Neighborhood crime may be associated with important barriers to accessing health-enabling resources in urban communities with high rates of crime. Keywords: Built environment, Neighborhood crime, Access to resources, Social determinants of health, Obesity, Hypertensio