189 research outputs found

    Malignant risk of indeterminate pediatric thyroid nodules—An institutional experience

    Full text link
    BackgroundFew studies focus on pediatric thyroid nodules categorized under indeterminate diagnostic categories. The current study was conducted to assess the risk of malignancy of indeterminate pediatric thyroid nodules.MethodsA search of the institutional electronic pathology database from 01/2011 to 09/2018 was performed to identify pediatric (<21 years old) thyroid nodules that were interpreted as follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN), or suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and subsequently managed with surgery, repeat fine‐needle aspiration (FNA), or ≥ 6 months of clinical/imaging monitoring. Results of follow‐up (F/U) surgical resections and repeat FNA/Afirma tests, and clinical and radiologic data were collected.ResultsWe identified 46 cases from 42 patients (11‐20 years old, 33 females and 9 males), including 30 FLUS, 10 SFN, and 6 SFM. Twenty‐five FLUS, ten SFN, and six SFM cases underwent surgery. The histology revealed carcinomas in 36% of FLUS, 20% of SFN, and 100% of SFM categories; follicular adenomas in 32% of FLUS and 80% of SFN categories; and benign nodules in 32% of FLUS category. All five nonsurgically treated FLUS cases were considered benign based on the findings of repeat FNA/Afirma tests (n = 3, 3‐22 months F/U) or clinical/radiologic exams (n = 2, 8‐12 months F/U).ConclusionsBased on a limited study cohort, malignancy was identified in 36%, 20%, and 100% of surgically managed pediatric thyroid nodules categorized as FLUS, SFN, and SFM, respectively; suggesting a markedly higher malignant rate than the implied malignant risk for FLUS and SFM categories in adults.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151306/1/dc24266.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151306/2/dc24266_am.pd

    Improving colon cancer screening in community clinics: CRC Screening and Community Clinics

    Get PDF
    We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two interventions designed to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in safety-net settings

    Risk management of biosimilars in oncology: each medicine is a work in progress

    Get PDF
    Drug licensing and drug safety monitoring for standard chemical entities have been established and are routinely used. These have resulted in a solid foundation of knowledge from which confident therapeutic decisions can be made. For many chemical entities, this advanced level of experience is also present for the generic products. The expertise surrounding the development of biosimilar competitor versions is increasing and progress is encouraging. To address the re-engineering and comparability complexities of biosimilars, the European Union imposed a requirement that risk management plans be included in the medications’ marketing applications. This paper summarizes and discusses the circumstances complicating the public’s view of drug safety, historical incidents during the transition from innovative to competitor products, as well as retrospective assessments of the development and post-marketing experiences thus far with two biosimilars. Through assessing the market entries and post-marketing experiences of biosimilars used in oncology, the healthcare field can better prepare for the next wave of comparator-products: biosimilar monoclonal antibodies

    Correction to: First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

    Get PDF
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of one of the author names. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author names are indicated and the author name has been updated in the original publication. The authors also reported an error in the Methods section of the original article. In this Correction the incorrect and correct versions of the affected sentence are indicated. The original article has not been updated with regards to the error in the Methods section.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144529/1/12967_2018_Article_1552.pd

    CCWORK protocol: a longitudinal study of Canadian Correctional Workers' Well-being, Organizations, Roles and Knowledge.

    Get PDF
    IntroductionKnowledge about the factors that contribute to the correctional officer's (CO) mental health and well-being, or best practices for improving the mental health and well-being of COs, have been hampered by the dearth of rigorous longitudinal studies. In the current protocol, we share the approach used in the Canadian Correctional Workers' Well-being, Organizations, Roles and Knowledge study (CCWORK), designed to investigate several determinants of health and well-being among COs working in Canada's federal prison system.Methods and analysis CCWORK is a multiyear longitudinal cohort design (2018-2023, with a 5-year renewal) to study 500 COs working in 43 Canadian federal prisons. We use quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments (ie, surveys, interviews and clinical assessments) to assess participants' mental health, correctional work experiences, correctional training experiences, views and perceptions of prison and prisoners, and career aspirations. Our baseline instruments comprise two surveys, one interview and a clinical assessment, which we administer when participants are still recruits in training. Our follow-up instruments refer to a survey, an interview and a clinical assessment, which are conducted yearly when participants have become COs, that is, in annual 'waves'. Ethics and dissemination CCWORK has received approval from the Research Ethics Board of the Memorial University of Newfoundland (File No. 20190481). Participation is voluntary, and we will keep all responses confidential. We will disseminate our research findings through presentations, meetings and publications (e.g., journal articles and reports). Among CCWORK's expected scientific contributions, we highlight a detailed view of the operational, organizational and environmental stressors impacting CO mental health and well-being, and recommendations to prison administrators for improving CO well-being

    Cytologic studies of the fallopian tube in patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy

    Full text link
    Background: Mounting evidence suggests the fallopian tube as the origin for ovarian high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). We attempted to identify the tubal cytological features that allow us to distinguish malignant from benign conditions. Methods: Tubal specimens (n = 56) were collected from patients who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) due to various clinical indications. A standard procedure to collect fallopian tube brushings from freshly received surgical specimens was developed. Cytological diagnoses were classified into three categories: benign, atypical, and suspicious for malignancy/malignant. Cytological variables of individual cells and epithelia were subjected to statistical analysis. The fallopian tube histology was used as diagnostic reference for confirmation of cytology diagnosis. Results: Among the 56 fallopian tube specimens, 2 (3.7 %) showed inadequate cellularity preventing further evaluation, 11 (20.4 %) were diagnosed as malignant or suspicious of malignancy, 7 were atypical, and 36 were benign. The presence of three dimensional clusters (p < 0.0001, Fisher's Exact Test), or prominent nucleoli (p = 0.0252, Fisher Exact test) was highly correlated with the diagnosis of malignancy. The suspicious malignant/malignant cytological diagnosis was also highly correlated with presence of HGSC with or without serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). Conclusions: Tubal cytology may be useful for ovarian cancer screening and early detection.Depart of Pathology, University of Arizona; Mark and Jane Gibson endowment fundThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
    corecore