6 research outputs found
Segmented spinal cord regions for each group of subjects (Upper–Lower vertebral level limits).
<p>Segmented spinal cord regions for each group of subjects (Upper–Lower vertebral level limits).</p
Cervical spinal cord template and probability tissue map.
<p>(a) Coronal (left), sagittal (middle) and axial views (right) of the cervical spinal cord template through mid-vertebral level from C2 to C7. (b) Probability tissue map. Views are arranged in the same order and orientation as in (a). A, anterior; I, inferior, L, left, P, posterior, R, right; S, superior.</p
Overview of DTbM steps (S).
<p>Slice 1 represents an example of a resampled axial image. Slices 2 and 3 represent the progressive contrast enhancement of slice 1.</p
Accuracy of mean cross-sectional area measured at C2 vertebral level.
<p>Manual segmentation by the experienced operator was the ground truth for accuracy measurements.</p><p>Accuracy of mean cross-sectional area measured at C2 vertebral level.</p
Results of the visual evaluation.
<p>*Asymptomatic syrinx revealed by the visual evaluation.</p><p>Results of the visual evaluation.</p
Criteria and scores for the visual evaluation.
<p><sup>1</sup>Insufficient to moderate overlap in at least 3 vertebral levels.</p><p><sup>2</sup>Insufficient to moderate overlap in less than 3 vertebral levels.</p><p><sup>3</sup>Global substantial overlap agreement.</p><p><sup>4</sup>Global perfect overlap agreement.</p><p>Criteria and scores for the visual evaluation.</p