Long-term outcomes after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies

View full abstracthttps://openworks.mdanderson.org/leading-edge/1007/thumbnail.jp

Paraneoplastic Hyperleukocytosis in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Background: Paraneoplastic hyperleukocytosis is a rare phenomenon observed in patients with adenocarcinomas and other malignancies. In this study, we present a case of paraneoplastic hyperleukocytosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma secondary to excessive secretion of serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Presentation: We report a 71-year-old Caucasian male who presented to our hospital with hyperleukocytosis in the setting of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The patient was recently diagnosed 4 months before presentation and received abraxane/gemcitabine in addition to palliative radiation therapy for continued gastrointestinal bleeding. During routine laboratory assessment, the patient was found to have a white blood cell (WBC) count of 153 K/UL (75% neutrophils and 14% bands). Bone marrow biopsy and cytology were negative for neoplastic features. Serum G-CSF levels returned markedly elevated, supporting the diagnosis of paraneoplastic hyperleukocytosis. Interestingly, the WBC count decreased significantly following each of two cycles of chemotherapy, further suggesting a paraneoplastic etiology of hyperleukocytosis. The patient did not receive any growth factor support at any point before or during treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, the presence of hyperleukocytosis in cancer should raise clinical suspicion of a paraneoplastic phenomenon when other possible causes have been excluded. Hyperleukocytosis in this setting may correlate with progression of disease and lessen with treatment

Is There Still a Role for Transplant for Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) in the Era of CAR-T Cell Therapy?

For years, upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) has been the standard of care for younger and physically fit mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients after chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) induction. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have proven to be excellent salvage therapies, but their durability remains a question, especially in high-risk (HR) MCL. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) was the only option for long-term remission and possibly cure for MCL relapse after auto-HCT and sometime as upfront consolidation for a young patient with HR MCL (debatable). We have seen a paradigm shift since the FDA approval in July 2020 of the brexucabtagene autoleucel chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy for relapsed and refractory (R/R) MCL with an preliminary evidence suggesting CAR-T may overcome known biological risk factors in MCL. Given its safety profile and excellent efficacy, the role of CAR-T among other approved therapies and HCT may need to be better defined. Based on the current evidence, auto-HCT remains a standard frontline consolidation therapy. CAR-T therapy is a preferred option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, particularly those who failed BTK inhibitors. In certain high-risk MCL patients (such as high ki 67, TP53 alterations, complex karyotype, blastoid morphology, early relapse after initial diagnosis), CAR-T cell therapy may be considered before BTK inhibitors (preferably on a clinical trial). The role of allo-HCT is unclear in the CAR-T era, but remains a viable option for eligible patients who have no access or who have failed CAR-T therapy. Our review discusses current standards and the shifting paradigms in the indications for HCT and the role of CAR-T cell therapy for MCL. Prospective studies tailored based on risk factors are needed to better define the optimal sequences of HCT and cellular therapy and other approved novel therapies

Molecular disparity in human leukocyte antigens is associated with outcomes in haploidentical stem cell transplantation

Haploidentical donors are increasingly used for patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although several factors have been associated with transplant outcomes, the impact of HLA disparity in haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of HLA disparity quantified by mismatched eplets (ME) load of each HLA locus on the clinical outcome of 278 consecutive haploidentical transplants. Here, we demonstrated that the degree of HLA molecular mismatches, at individual HLA loci, may be relevant to clinical outcome in the haplo-HSCT. A significantly better overall survival was associated with higher ME load from HLA-A (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.99; P = .003) and class I loci (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; P = .045) in the host-versus-graft direction. The apparent survival advantage of HLA-A ME was primarily attributed to reduced risk in relapse associated with an increase in HLA-A ME load (subdistribution HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98; P = .004). Furthermore, we have identified an association between the risk of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and a higher ME load at HLA-B and class I loci in graft-versus-host (GVH) direction. Additionally, GVH nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch defined by T-cell epitope grouping was significantly associated with relapse protection (subdistribution HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59; P = .004) without a concurrent increase in GVHD. These findings indicate that alloreactivity generated by HLA disparity at certain HLA loci is associated with transplant outcomes, and ME analysis of individual HLA loci might assist donor selection and risk stratification in haplo-HSCT

Long-term outcomes after haploidentical stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

The introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis lead to significant improvements in haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) outcomes over the past decade. We retrospectively assessed long-term outcomes of patients who had their first haplo-SCT between February 2009 and March 2019. Long-term survivors were defined as patients who were alive and disease-free at 2 years after transplant. Three hundred thirty-five patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 18-72) were identified. Of these, 142 patients were disease-free and alive at 2 years after transplant. The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 42% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 52 months for the long-term survivor group, the 4-year PFS and OS were 94% and 96%, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 2.9% and 3.3%, respectively. Age ≥55 years was the only predictive factor in multivariate analysis for inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-9.60; P = .020) and OS (HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.08-10.18; P = .037). Thirteen patients (9%) died in the long-term survivor group, only 2 of whom died of relapsed disease. Secondary primary malignancy was the most frequent cause of NRM (n = 4), followed by infection (n = 2). For haplo-SCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, our findings suggest an excellent long-term survival for patients who were disease-free and alive at 2 years after transplant. Late relapses were rare, and age was the only predictive factor for long-term outcomes