7 research outputs found

    Diagnosis and management of a heterotopic pregnancy and ruptured rudimentary uterine horn

    No full text
    Abstract Background Heterotopic pregnancies implanted in a rudimentary uterine horn account for 1 in 2–3 million gestations, and confer significant risk of morbidity due to uterine rupture and hemorrhage. Case presentation A 34-year-old nullipara presented with acute pelvic pain at 17 weeks of gestation with dichorionic-diamniotic twins, one in each horn of an anomalous uterus first diagnosed in pregnancy as bicornuate. Three-dimensional ultrasound and MRI revealed myometrial disruption in the left rudimentary uterine horn, and the patient underwent an uncomplicated abdominal hemi-hysterectomy. Fourteen days later, an uncomplicated dilation and curettage was performed for a fetal anomaly in the remaining twin in the right unicornuate uterus. Conclusion This case demonstrates the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of myometrial integrity in a gravid patient with a heterotopic pregnancy and ruptured rudimentary uterine horn. This case demonstrates the importance of pre-pregnancy diagnosis and management of mullerian anomalies

    Yonsei Medical Journal

    Get PDF
    PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility for gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA) in rapid detection of influenza virus A infection.Materials and MethodsSeventy-three patients were enrolled. All patients contributed nasopharyngeal secretions and paired serum samples. Nasopharyngeal secretions was used for colloidal gold immunochromatographic rapid assay for influenza A virus immediately after the collection of specimen. Paired serum samples were used for the hemagglutination inhibition assay at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention influenza network laboratory in Beijing.ResultsCompare GICA test to hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, the Kappa value was 0.402 and the p value in the paired \ucf\u20212 test was higher than 0.05. Therefore, the difference was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of GICA was 50.0% and the specificity was 90.2%, and the negative predictive value was 90.2%.ConclusionThe sensitivity for Influenza A antigen detection by using GICA is relatively low, the specificity is relatively satisfactory
    corecore