2 research outputs found
Real-Time Prediction of Size-Resolved Ultrafine Particulate Matter on Freeways
Ultrafine particulate matter (UFP; diameter <0.1 μm)
concentrations
are relatively high on the freeway, and time spent on freeways can
contribute a significant fraction of total daily UFP exposure. We
model real-time size-resolved UFP concentrations in summer time on-freeway
air. Particle concentrations (32 bins, 5.5 to 600 nm) were measured
on Minnesota freeways during summer 2006 and 2007 (Johnson, J. P.; Kittelson, D. B.; Watts, W.
F. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 5358−5364). Here, we develop and apply two-way stratified multilinear regressions,
using an approach analogous to mobile-monitoring land-use regression
but using real-time meteorological and traffic data. Our models offer
the strongest predictions in the 10–100 nm size range (adj-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.79–0.89, average adj-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.85) and acceptable but weaker predictions in the
130–200 nm range (adj-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.41–0.62,
average adj-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.52). The aggregate model
for total particle counts performs well (adj-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.77). Bootstrap resampling (<i>n</i> = 1000)
indicates that the proposed models are robust to minor perturbations
in input data. The proposed models are based on readily available
real-time information (traffic and meteorological parameters) and
can thus be exploited to offer spatiotemporally resolved prediction
of UFPs on freeways within similar geographic and meteorological environments.
The approach developed here provides an important step toward modeling
population exposure to UFP
Rural Alaska Water Treatment and Distribution Systems Incur High Energy Costs: Identifying Energy Drivers Using Panel Data Analysis for 78 Communities
The energy consumption for water treatment and distribution
in
rural Alaska communities that represent one of the coldest and most
isolated regions in the US has been unexplored. Using energy audits
data from Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), we investigate
the annual energy consumption patterns for water treatment and distribution
in 78 rural Alaska communities (average population < 500 people)
along with seasonal, regional, and population impacts, and water treatment/distribution
system types. Regional trends of per capita annual energy consumption
are as follows: Interior > Northern > Southwest > Gulf coast
> Southeast
regions of Alaska. Our results indicate that the per capita energy
consumption is highest during the winter and lowest during the summer.
Generally, the per capita energy consumption decreases with an increasing
population. The variation of per capita energy consumption based on
water distribution types shows that piped circulating systems consume
the most energy, followed by washeteria, piped pressure, and closed
haul. At the water treatment plant, space heating and electrical motors
have the highest per capita energy consumption, followed by domestic
hot water, tank heating, and lighting. The findings in this work suggest
that per capita energy consumption (kWh/p) for water treatment and
distribution in rural Alaska is about 12–26 times higher than
the national average and about two orders of magnitude higher economic
costs for the same. Overall, this work sheds light on energy use for
water treatment and distribution in rural Alaska and establishes a
baseline that would be useful for the rural Alaska communities’
adaptation to climate change efforts, specifically in planning for
and designing new water systems or updating existing systems