350 research outputs found
What proportion of initially prescribed antidepressants is still being prescribed chronically after 5 years in general practice? A longitudinal cohort analysis
Objectives Antidepressant prescribing almost doubled in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2012, which could be accounted for by longer continuation after the first prescription. This might be problematic given a growing concern of large-scale antidepressant dependence. We aimed to assess the extent and determinants of chronic antidepressant prescribing among patient aged 18 years and older. We hypothesise a relatively large prevalence of chronic (>2 years) prescription.Design A longitudinal observational study based on routinely registered prescription data from general practice.Setting 189 general practices in the Netherlands.Participants 326 025 patients with valid prescription data for all 5 years of the study.Outcome measures Primary outcome measure: the number of patients (N) receiving at least four antidepressant prescriptions in 2011, as well as during each of the four subsequent years. Secondary outcome measure: the above, but specified for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and for tricyclic antidepressants.Results Antidepressants were prescribed to almost 7% of our 326 025 participants each year. They were prescribed for depression (38%), anxiety (17%), other psychological disorders (20%) and non-psychological indications (25%). Antidepressants were prescribed in all 5 years to the 42% of the population who had at least four prescriptions dispensed in 2011. Chronic prescribing was higher among women than men, for those aged 45-64 years than for those aged > 65 years and for those treated for depression or anxiety than for non-psychological indications (eg, neuropathic pain). Chronic prescribing also varied markedly among general practices.Conclusion Chronic antidepressant use is common for depression and for anxiety and non-psychological diagnoses. Once antidepressants have been prescribed, general practitioners and other prescribers should be aware of the risks associated with long-term use and should provide annual monitoring of the continued need for therapy.</p
Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care: a systematic review
A multilevel analysis of three randomised controlled trials of the Australian Medical Sheepskin in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin in preventing sacral pressure ulcers (PUs), based on combined data from existing published trials. Design and setting: Data from two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) among Australian hospital patients and one RCT among Dutch nursing home patients were pooled, comprising a total population of 1281 patients from 45 nursing wards in 11 institutions. These data were analysed in two ways: with conventional meta-analysis based on the published effect sizes; and with multilevel binary logistic regression based on the combined individual patient data. In the multilevel analysis, patient, nursing ward and institution were used as levels and we controlled for sex, age, PU risk and number of days of observation.Main outcome measure: Incidence of sacral PUs. Results: Overall, the incidence of sacral PUs was 12.2% in the control group versus 5.4% in the intervention group with an Australian Medical Sheepskin. Conventional meta-analysis showed significantly reduced odds of developing a PU while using the sheepskin (odds ratio [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17–0.77]). Multilevel analysis gave an OR of 0.35 and narrowed the confidence interval by almost 50% (95% CI, 0.23–0.55). Conclusions: These analyses of pooled data confirm that the Australian Medical Sheepskin is effective in preventing sacral PUs. Multilevel analysis of individual patient data gives a more precise effect estimate than conventional meta-analysis
From shared care to disease management: key-influencing factors
BACKGROUND: In order to improve the quality of care of chronically ill patients the traditional boundaries between primary and secondary care are questioned. To demolish these boundaries so-called ‘shared care’ projects have been initiated in which different ways of substitution of care are applied. When these projects end, disease management may offer a solution to expand the achieved co-operation between primary and secondary care. OBJECTIVE: Answering the question: What key factors influence the development and implementation of shared care projects from a management perspective and how are they linked? THEORY: The theoretical framework is based on the concept of the learning organisation. DESIGN: Reference point is a multiple case study that finally becomes a single case study. Data are collected by means of triangulation. The studied cases concern two interrelated Dutch shared care projects for type 2 diabetic patients, that in the end proceed as one disease management project. RESULTS: In these cases the predominant key-influencing factors appear to be the project management, commitment and local context, respectively. The factor project management directly links the latter two, albeit managing both appear prerequisites to its success. In practice this implies managing the factors' interdependency by the application of change strategies and tactics in a committed and skilful way. CONCLUSION: Project management, as the most important and active key factor, is advised to cope with the interrelationships of the influencing factors in a gradually more fundamental way by using strategies and tactics that enable learning processes. Then small-scale shared care projects may change into a disease management network at a large scale, which may yield the future blueprint to proceed
Changes in health and primary health care use of Moroccan and Turkish migrants between 2001 and 2005: a longitudinal study
Background: Social environment and health status are related, and changes affecting social
relations may also affect the general health state of a group. During the past few years, several
events have affected the relationships between Muslim immigrants and the non-immigrant
population in many countries. This study investigates whether the health status of the Moroccan
and Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands has changed in four years, whether changes in health
status have had any influence on primary health care use, and which socio-demographic factors
might explain this relationship.
Methods: A cohort of 108 Turkish and 102 Moroccan respondents were interviewed in 2001 and
in 2005. The questionnaire included the SF-36 and the GP contact frequency (in the past two
months). Interviews were conducted in the language preferred by the respondents. Data were
analysed using multivariate linear regression.
Results: The mental health of the Moroccan group improved between 2001 and 2005. Physical
health remained unchanged for both groups. The number of GP contacts decreased with half a
contact/2 months among the Turkish group. Significant predictors of physical health change were:
age, educational level. For mental health change, these were: ethnicity, age, civil status, work
situation in 2001, change in work situation. For change in GP contacts: ethnicity, age and change in
mental and physical health.
Conclusion: Changes in health status concerned the mental health component. Changes in health
status were paired with changes in health care utilization. Among the Turkish group, an unexpected
decrease in GP contacts was noticed, whilst showing a generally unchanged health status. Further
research taking perceived quality of care into account might help shedding some light on this
outcome.
Using multilevel modelling to assess case-mix adjusters in consumers experience surveys in health care
Using multilevel modelling to assess case-mix adjusters in consumers experience surveys in health care
Measuring population health from a broader perspective:Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire
Introduction: Population health perspectives increasingly focus on people’s perception of resilience, ability to adapt and self-manage. The goal of this study is to determine whether the MijnKwaliteitVanLeven.nl (“MyQualityOfLife.nl”) survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the broader health perspectives at population level.Methods: 19,809 entries of the MyQualityOfLife.nl survey were used. To assess face validity, Huber’s six dimensions of positive health were used as a framework for expert feedback. A confirmative factor analyses was done using the expert’s item clustering, followed by data-driven explorative factor analyses and reliability tests.Results: Experts distributed 74 of the 118 items over all six dimensions of positive health. The confirmatory factor analysis model based on expert classification was not confirmed. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis excluded most items based on factor loading and suggested two factors; ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’, both showing excellent reliability.Conclusion: The MyQualityOfLife.nl survey can assess the broader concept of health in a population as well as ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’. However, the survey can currently not evaluate several of the positive health dimensions separately. Further research is needed to determine whether this is due to the instrument or the positive health dimensions
The impact of social capital, land use, air pollution and noise on individual morbidity in Dutch neighbourhoods
Compliance with a time-out procedure intended to prevent wrong surgery in hospitals:results of a national patient safety programme in the Netherlands
OBJECTIVE: To prevent wrong surgery, the WHO 'Safe Surgery Checklist' was introduced in 2008. The checklist comprises a time-out procedure (TOP): the final step before the start of the surgical procedure where the patient, surgical procedure and side/site are reviewed by the surgical team. The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent to which hospitals carry out the TOP before anaesthesia in the operating room, whether compliance has changed over time, and to determine factors that are associated with compliance.DESIGN: Evaluation study involving observations.SETTING: Operating rooms of 2 academic, 4 teaching and 12 general Dutch hospitals.PARTICIPANTS: A random selection was made from all adult patients scheduled for elective surgery on the day of the observation, preferably involving different surgeons and different procedures.RESULTS: Mean compliance with the TOP was 71.3%. Large differences between hospitals were observed. No linear trend was found in compliance during the study period. Compliance at general and teaching hospitals was higher than at academic hospitals. Compliance decreased with the age of the patient, general surgery showed lower compliance in comparison with other specialties and compliance was higher when the team was focused on the TOP.CONCLUSIONS: Large differences in compliance with the TOP were observed between participating hospitals which can be attributed at least in part to the type of hospital, surgical specialty and patient characteristics. Hospitals do not comply consistently with national guidelines to prevent wrong surgery and further implementation as well as further research into non-compliance is needed.</p
- …