Remote consultations in paediatric urology–Not just for pandemics?

Although some centres have successfully integrated remote clinics into their paediatric urological practice, for many, remote clinics have developed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. One UK-based institution has integrated remote clinics in their practice for over two years and has developed guidelines considering which conditions may be suitable for remote consultations. These guidelines have been appraised by the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists paediatric working group. Through practical experience and anticipated difficulties, we have discussed considerations that paediatric urology departments should ponder when integrating remote clinics into their practice as we move forward from the pandemic

Validation of the modified Bosniak classification system to risk stratify pediatric cystic renal masses : an international, multi-site study from the pediatric urologic oncology working group of the societies for pediatric urology

Background Pediatric cystic renal lesions are challenging to manage as little is known about their natural course. A modified Bosniak (mBosniak) classification system has been proposed for risk stratification in pediatric patients that takes ultrasound (US) and/or computed tomogram (CT) characteristics into account. However, literature validating this system remains limited. Objective To determine if the mBosniak classification system correlates with pathologic diagnoses. The hypothesis is that mBosniak classification can stratify the risk of malignancy in children with renal cysts. Study design Patients treated for cystic renal masses with available imaging and pathology between 2000 and 2019 from five institutions were identified. Clinical characteristics and pathology were obtained retrospectively. Characteristics from the most recent US, CT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recorded. Reviewers assigned a mBosniak classification to each scan. mBosniak scores 1/2 were considered low-risk and 3/4 high-risk. These groups were compared with pathology (classified as benign, intermediate, malignant). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) were calculated to assess this categorization as a screening tool to guide surgical intervention. Agreement between imaging modalities was also explored. Results 99 patients were identified. High-risk imaging findings were correlated with malignant or intermediate pathology with a sensitivity of 88.3%, specificity of 84.6%, PPV of 89.8%, NPV of 82.5%, +LR of 5.7, and -LR of 0.14. The sensitivity for detecting malignant lesions only was 100%. There was substantial agreement between US/CT (n = 55; kappa = 0.66) and moderate agreement between US/MRI (n = 20; kappa = 0.52) and CT/MRI (n = 13; kappa = 0.47). Discussion The mBos classification system is a useful tool in predicting the likelihood of benign vs. intermediate or malignant pathology. The relatively high sensitivity and specificity of the system for prediction of high-risk lesions makes this classification applicable to clinical decision making. In addition, all malignant lesions were accurately identified as mBosniak 4 on imaging. This study adds substantial data to the relatively small body of literature validating the mBosniak system for risk stratifying pediatric cystic renal lesions. Conclusions Pediatric cystic renal lesions assigned mBosniak class 1/2 are mostly benign, whereas class 3/4 lesions are likely intermediate or malignant pathology. We observed that the mBosniak system correctly identified pathology appropriate for surgical management in 88% of cases and did not miss malignant pathologies. There is substantial agreement between CT and US scans concerning mBos classification

European countries have different rates of sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy and at the time of reversal

Introduction Effective male contraceptive options are condoms and vasectomy. Vasectomy should not be considered a reversible method of contraception even if vasovasostomy can be offered to men to restore fertility after vasectomy. Therefore, there is a real questioning among urologists concerning cryopreservation before vasectomy. We carried out an international survey concerning the practice of cryopreservation before vasectomy and during vasovasostomy. Material and methods An online anonymous survey was submitted from January to June 2021 to six European urological societies. The 31-items questionnaire included questions about demography, habits of cryopreservation before vasectomy or during vasectomy reversal, and in case of urogenital cancers. Results 228 urologists from six urological societies in five different countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Finland) answered the questionnaire. French urologists were more in favor of cryopreservation before vasectomy than other European urologists (p < 0.0001). They also significantly found that not talking about cryopreservation before vasectomy is a medical fault unlike other urologists (p < 0.0001). The specialization in andrology did not influence the choice of cryopreservation before vasectomy (p = 0.9452). The majority of urologists did not perform intraoperative sperm extraction during vasovasostomy (81%; n = 127) with a significant difference between urologists with or without andrology training (p = 0.0146). Success rates after vasovasostomy are significantly better for robot-assisted surgery (p = 0.0159) or with a microscope (p = 0.0456) versus without a microscope. Conclusion Cryopreservation before definitive sterilization significantly varies among European urologists and seems to be mostly dictated by habits than by knowledge. An international consensus is needed to standardize practices and guide patients' choices