24 research outputs found

    Predicting a low cortisol response to adrenocorticotrophic hormone in the critically ill: a retrospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Identification of risk factors for diminished cortisol response to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in the critically ill could facilitate recognition of relative adrenal insufficiency in these patients. Therefore, we studied predictors of a low cortisol response to ACTH. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a general intensive care unit of a university hospital over a three year period. The study included 405 critically ill patients, who underwent a 250 μg ACTH stimulation test because of prolonged hypotension or need for vasopressor/inotropic therapy. Plasma cortisol was measured before and 30 and 60 min after ACTH injection. A low adrenal response was defined as an increase in cortisol of less than 250 nmol/l or a peak cortisol level below 500 nmol/l. Various clinical variables were collected at admission and on the test day. Results: A low ACTH response occurred in 63% of patients. Predictors, in multivariate analysis, included sepsis at admission, low platelets, low pH and bicarbonate, low albumin levels, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and absence of prior cardiac surgery, and these predictors were independent of baseline cortisol and intubation with etomidate. Baseline cortisol/albumin ratios, as an index of free cortisol, were directly related and increases in cortisol/albumin were inversely related to disease severity indicators such as the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (Spearman r = -0.21; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In critically ill patients, low pH/bicarbonate and platelet count, greater severity of disease and organ failure are predictors of a low adrenocortical response to ACTH, independent of baseline cortisol values and cortisol binding capacity in blood. These findings may help to delineate relative adrenal insufficiency and suggest that adrenocortical suppression occurs as a result of metabolic acidosis and coagulation disturbances

    Effect of Bronchoscopy on Gas Exchange and Respiratory Mechanics in Critically Ill Patients With Atelectasis: An Observational Cohort Study

    Get PDF
    Background: Atelectasis frequently develops in critically ill patients and may result in impaired gas exchange among other complications. The long-term effects of bronchoscopy on gas exchange and the effects on respiratory mechanics are largely unknown.Objective: To evaluate the effect of bronchoscopy on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with atelectasis.Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with clinical indication for bronchoscopy because of atelectasis diagnosed on chest X-ray (CXR).Results: In total, 101 bronchoscopies were performed in 88 ICU patients. Bronchoscopy improved oxygenation (defined as an increase of PaO2/FiO2 ratio &gt; 20 mmHg) and ventilation (defined as a decrease of &gt; 2 mmHg in partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood) in 76 and 59% of procedures, respectively, for at least 24 h. Patients with a low baseline value of PaO2/FiO2 ratio and a high baseline value of PaCO2 were most likely to benefit from bronchoscopy. In addition, in intubated and pressure control ventilated patients, respiratory mechanics improved after bronchoscopy for up to 24 h. Mild complications, and in particular desaturation between 80 and 90%, were reported in 13% of the patients.Conclusions: In selected critically ill patients with atelectasis, bronchoscopy improves oxygenation, ventilation, and respiratory mechanics for at least 24 h

    Large-scale ICU data sharing for global collaboration: the first 1633 critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Dutch Data Warehouse

    Get PDF

    Relative adrenal insufficiency as a predictor of disease severity, mortality, and beneficial effects of corticosteroid treatment in septic shock

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concept of relative adrenal insufficiency necessitating corticosteroid therapy in septic shock. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 218 consecutive patients with septic shock in a 3-yr period who underwent a short 250-μg adrenocorticotropic hormone test because of >6 hrs of hypotension requiring repeated fluid challenges and/or vasopressor/inotropic treatment. INTERVENTIONS: The test was performed by intravenously injecting 250 μg of synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone and measuring cortisol immediately before and 30 and 60 mins postinjection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intensive care unit mortality until day 28 was 22%. Nonsurvivors had greater disease severity, as exemplified by higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, on the day of adrenocorticotropic hormone testing. Cortisol levels directly correlated with albumin levels. Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score increased with higher strata of baseline cortisol/albumin or lower cortisol increases/albumin ratios as measures of free cortisol. Baseline cortisol, cortisol increases, and albumin levels did not independently contribute to mortality prediction by disease severity and absence of corticosteroid (hydrocortisone) treatment in a Cox proportional hazard model, although adrenocorticotropic hormone-induced cortisol increase <100 nmol/L (n = 53) predicted mortality (p = .007). Posttest treatment by corticosteroids (n = 161, 74%) was associated with higher survival in patients with cortisol increase <100 nmol/L (p = .0296). CONCLUSIONS: In intensive care unit patients with septic shock, the cortisol response to adrenocorticotropic hormone inversely relates to disease severity, independent of blood cortisol binding. An adrenocorticotropic hormone-induced cortisol increase <100 nmol/L predicts mortality and beneficial effects of corticosteroid treatment. The data favor relative adrenal insufficiency

    Immunoparalysis as a cause for invasive aspergillosis?

    No full text
    Aspergillus infections are among the most feared opportunistic infections in humans. These organisms are ubiquitous in nature; protection against infection is usually provided by anatomical barriers and by the immune system. Tissue invasion by Aspergillus is uncommon, occurring primarily in the setting of immunosuppression. The prognosis of invasive aspergillosis is very poor. Although it is widely recognised that critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are at risk for nosocomial infections, it is not generally appreciated that such patients may also be at risk for opportunistic infections usually seen only in immunocompromised patients. This might be explained by a biphasic immunological pattern during sepsis: an early hyperinflammatory phase followed by an anti-inflammatory response, leading to a hypo-inflammatory state, the so-called compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS or immunoparalysis). We describe four patients admitted to our ICU for various reasons, without a history of abnormal immune function, who developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. We hypothesise that the occurrence of these opportunistic infections in our patients may have been due to immunoparalysis, and that perhaps all ICU patients with sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) may be at risk for opportunistic infections such as aspergillosis as a result of this syndrome. Physicians treating critically ill patients in the ICU should be aware of the CARS/immunoparalysis syndrome and its potential to cause opportunistic infections, even in patients with normal immune function prior to ICU admission

    The Nursing Activities Score Per Nurse Ratio Is Associated With In-Hospital Mortality, Whereas the Patients Per Nurse Ratio Is Not

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown contradicting results on the association of nursing workload and mortality. Most of these studies expressed workload as patients per nurse ratios; however, this does not take into account that some patients require more nursing time than others. Nursing time can be quantified by tools like the Nursing Activities Score. We investigated the association of the Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio, respectively, the patients per nurse ratio with in-hospital mortality in ICUs. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the National Intensive Care Evaluation database. SETTING: Fifteen Dutch ICUs. PATIENTS: All ICU patients admitted to and registered ICU nurses working at 15 Dutch ICUs between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2018, were included. The association of mean or day 1 patients per nurse ratio and Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio with in-hospital mortality was analyzed using logistic regression models.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio greater than 41 for both mean Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio as well as Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio on day 1 were associated with a higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratios, 1.19 and 1.17, respectively). After case-mix adjustment the association between a Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio greater than 61 for both mean Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio as well as Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio on day 1 and in-hospital mortality remained significant (odds ratios, 1.29 and 1.26, respectively). Patients per nurse ratio was not associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A higher Nursing Activities Score per nurse ratio was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. In contrast, no association was found between patients per nurse ratios and in-hospital mortality in The Netherlands. Therefore, we conclude that it is more important to focus on the nursing workload that the patients generate rather than on the number of patients the nurse has to take care of in the ICU

    Association between organizational characteristics and adequate pain management at the intensive care unit

    No full text
    Purpose Half of the patients experience pain during their ICU stay which is known to influence their outcomes. Nurses and physicians encounter organizational barriers towards pain assessment and treatment. We aimed to evaluate the association between adequate pain management and nurse to patient ratio, bed occupancy rate, and fulltime presence of an intensivist. Materials and methods We performed unadjusted and case-mix adjusted mixed-effect logistic regression modeling on data from thirteen Dutch ICUs to investigate the association between ICU organizational characteristics and adequate pain management, i.e. patient-shift observations in which patients' pain was measured and acceptable, or unacceptable and normalized within 1 h.All ICU patients admitted between December 2017 and June 2018 were included, excluding patients who were delirious, comatose or had a Glasgow coma score < 8 at the first day of ICU admission. Results Case-mix adjusted nurse to patient ratios of 0.70 to 0.80 and over 0.80 were significantly associated with adequate pain management (OR [95% confidence interval] of respectively 1.14 [1.07–1.21] and 1.16 [1.08–1.24]). Bed occupancy rate and intensivist presence showed no association. Conclusion Higher nurse to patient ratios increase the percentage of patients with adequate pain management especially in medical and mechanically ventilated patients

    Workload scoring systems in the Intensive Care and their ability to quantify the need for nursing time: A systematic literature review

    No full text
    Introduction: The Intensive Care Unit is a resource intense service with a high nursing workload per patient resulting in a low ratio of patients per nurse. This review aims to identify existing scoring systems for measuring nursing workload on the Intensive Care and assess their validity and reliability to quantify the needed nursing time. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature indexed before 01/Mar/2018 in the bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cinahl. Full-text articles were selected and data on systems measuring nursing workload on the Intensive Care and translation of this workload into the amount of nursing time needed was extracted. Results: We included 71 articles identifying 34 different scoring systems of which 27 were included for further analysis as these described a translation of workload into nursing time needed. Almost all systems were developed with nurses. The validity of most scoring systems was evaluated by comparing them with another system (59%) or by using time measurements (26%). The most common way to translate workload-scores into nursing time needed was by categorizing the Nurse:Patient-ratios. Validation of the Nurse:Patient-ratios was mostly evaluated by comparing the results with other systems or with the actual planning and not with objective time measurements. Conclusion: Despite the large attention given to nursing workload systems for Intensive Care, only a few systems objectively evaluated the validity and reliability of measuring nursing workload with moderate results. The Nursing Activity Score system performed best. Poor methodology for the translation of workload scores into Nurse:Patient-ratio weakens the value of nursing workload scoring systems in daily Intensive Care practice

    Nurse Operation Workload (NOW), a new nursing workload model for intensive care units based on time measurements: An observational study

    No full text
    Background: Several instruments have been developed to measure nursing workload. The commonly used Nursing Activities Score (NAS) and Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) are applied to all types of ICU patients. Former research showed that NAS explained 59 to 81% of actual nursing time, whereas the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) described only 43% of the actual nursing time. In both models the development was not based on time measurements. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a time-based model which can assess patient related nursing workload more accurately and to evaluate whether patient characteristics influence nursing time and therefore should be included in the model. Design: Observational study design. Setting: All 82 Dutch ICUs participate in the National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) quality registry. Fifteen of these ICUs are participating in the newly implemented voluntary nursing capacity module. Seven of these ICUs voluntarily participated in this study. Participants: The patient(s) that were under the responsibility of a chosen nurse were followed by the observer during the entire shift. Methods: Time spent per nursing activity per patient was measured in different shifts in seven Dutch ICUs. Nursing activities were measured using an in-house developed web application. Three different models of varying complexity (1. nursing activities only; 2. nursing activities and case-mix correction; 3. complex model with case-mix correction per nursing activity) were developed to explain the total amount of nursing time per patient. The performance of the three models was assessed in 1000 bootstrap samples using the squared Pearson correlation coefficient (R2), Root Mean Squared Prediction Error (RMSPE), Mean Absolute Prediction Error (MAPE), and prediction bias. Results: In total 287 unique patients have been observed in 371 shifts. Model one's Pearson's R was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86–0.92), model two with case-mix correction 0.90 (95%CI 0.88–0.93), and the third complex model 0.64 (95%CI 0.56–0.72) compared with the actual patient related nursing workload. Conclusion: The newly developed Nurse Operation Workload (NOW) model outperforms existing models in measuring nursing workload, while it includes a lower number of activities and therewith lowers the registration burden. Case-mix correction does not further improve the performance of this model. The patient related nursing workload measured by the NOW gives insight in the actual nursing time needed by patients and can therefore be used to evaluate the average workload per patient per nurse
    corecore