19 research outputs found

    Top-line results from SUNRISE: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of bavituximab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated stage IIIb/iv non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

    Get PDF
    Background: Exposed phosphatidylserine (PS) in the tumor microenvironment is highly immunosuppressive. Bavituximab targets PS in the presence of β2GP1 as a high affinity complex and repolarizes myeloid derived suppressor cells and M2 macrophages to M1, resulting in production of pronflammatory cytokines such as IFNγ and IL-12, maturation of dendritic cells and induction of tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte immunity. In a prior double-blind Phase II trial in 2nd line non-squamous NSCLC, bavituximab 3 mg/kg plus docetaxel was well-tolerated and demonstrated 60% improvement (11.7 vs 7.3 month) in median overall survival (OS) compared to control. Methods: We accrued 597 patients with Stage IIIb/IV non-squamous NSCLC who progressed on platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a 1:1 ratio to receive up to six 21-day cycles of docetaxel in combination with either weekly 3 mg/kg bavituximab (B + D) or placebo (D) until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall response rate and safety. Exploratory testing of immune correlatives is ongoing

    Hydrodynamic Implications of Large Offshore Mussel Farms

    No full text

    Future directions in the evaluation of c-MET-driven malignancies

    No full text
    The c-MET (mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor) receptor tyrosine kinase is an exciting novel drug target in view of its key role in oncogenesis, as well as its association with disease prognosis in a number of malignancies. Several drugs targeting c-MET are currently showing promise in clinical trials and will hopefully validate positive observations from preclinical studies. The potential efficacy of these different therapeutic agents is expected to be influenced by the mechanism of aberrant hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-MET signaling pathway activation in a particular cancer, but presents a promising strategy for cancer treatment either as a single agent or as part of a combination therapeutic approach. However, there is an ongoing need to improve and accelerate the transition of preclinical research into improved therapeutic strategies for patients with cancer. The main challenges facing the development of HGF/c-MET-targeted agents for cancer treatment include the discovery of rationally designed anticancer drugs and combination strategies, as well as the validation of predictive biomarkers. This paper discusses these issues, with a particular focus on future directions in the evaluation of c-MET-driven malignancies

    Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331<sup>☆</sup>.

    No full text
    Patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC. CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus &lt;1%. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Objective response rate was 13.7% versus 16.5% (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27); median duration of response was 8.3 versus 4.5 months. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were 13.8% versus 73.2%. Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab
    corecore