4 research outputs found

    Digital health for migrants, ethnic and cultural minorities and the role of participatory development : a scoping review

    Get PDF
    Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly used to address the health of migrants and ethnic minorities, some of whom have reduced access to health services and worse health outcomes than majority populations. This study aims to give an overview of digital health interventions developed for ethnic or cultural minority and migrant populations, the health problems they address, their effectiveness at the individual level and the degree of participation of target populations during development. We used the methodological approach of the scoping review outlined by Tricco. We found a total of 2248 studies, of which 57 were included, mostly using mobile health technologies, followed by websites, informational videos, text messages and telehealth. Most interventions focused on illness self-management, mental health and wellbeing, followed by pregnancy and overall lifestyle habits. About half did not involve the target population in development and only a minority involved them consistently. The studies we found indicate that the increased involvement of the target population in the development of digital health tools leads to a greater acceptance of their use

    Intensity : what rehabilitation technology can add to the subject

    No full text
    Evidence more and more supports the notion that higher intensity training also leads to better outcomes in neurorehabilitation. However, current practice shows that for many reasons, it is challenging for health care professionals to deliver such high intensity training. Rehabilitation technology can be one important factor to help overcome those barriers and to provide to our patients the intensive therapy they need and deserve. It is, however, crucial that those devices are well integrated into the clinical every day practice, well combined with traditional therapy and that reimbursement questions are solved. The work is cut out for us, let’s all get to work, for the benefit of our patients

    Getting the best out of advanced rehabilitation technology for the lower limbs : minding motor learning principles

    No full text
    Advanced technology, including gait-training devices, is increasingly being integrated into neurorehabilitation. However, to use gait-training devices to their optimal potential, it is important that they are applied in accordance with motor learning and locomotor training principles. In this article, we outline the most important principles and explain how advanced gait-training devices are best used to improve therapy outcome

    One-year evolution of ulnar somatosensory potentials after trauma in 365 tetraplegic patients: early prediction of potential upper limb function

    Full text link
    Early prediction of hand function is crucial for efficient rehabilitation of cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). This study investigated correlations between ulnar somatosensory evoked potentials (ulnar SSEPs) and functional outcome of hand function following acute traumatic cervical cord injury. Neurological assessment of sensory scores and hand function were compared with five ulnar SSEP categories of similar persistence and quality in 365 patients throughout the first year after cSCI. Of the 365 patients, 218 (68%) exhibited ulnar SSEP potentials at any one stage during the year, and in 147 patients (40.3%) ulnar SSEPs were obtainable at every assessment stage. While ulnar SSEP latency and amplitude assessments remained largely unchanged over time in the majority of patients, hand function improved remarkably during the first year following cSCI. One year outcome of hand function was predetermined by ulnar SSEP category due to distinct differences in the ulnar SSEP parameters. Additionally, an early prognostic group allocation by ulnar SSEP criteria at the first assessment stage within 4 weeks after spinal trauma allowed reliable prediction of hand function outcome after 1 year. We conclude that early assessment of ulnar SSEP as a non-invasive and objective neurophysiological test is a valuable marker of prospective hand function and independence 1 year after cSCI. This could be most relevant for planning neurorehabilitation, and in prospective clinical SCI trials
    corecore