The relationship between age, sleep and health in shiftworking nurses

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN032487 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

Intermediair tussen arts en patiënt: nieuwe functie van triageassistent roept vragen op.

De triageassistent is een nieuwe functie in de huisartsenzorg. De functie wordt voornamelijk vervuld door praktijkassistenten die om- of bijscholing hebben gevolgd. De arts is verantwoordelijk voor het functioneren van de triageassistent. Een kwart van de managers is niet tevreden over controle en supervisie. Van de genoemde zwakke kanten van het triagesysteem is 40 procent direct gerelateerd aan het functioneren van de triageassistent. De functie van triageassistent is nog niet volledig ingebed in de huisartsenzorg. Duidelijkheid inzake verantwoordelijkheden, certificering en controle en supervisie, moeten het vertrouwen van professionals en managers in de functie vergroten. (aut.ref.

Observational study to assess pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus.

Background: Toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) can negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, but can be prevented by simple precautions of pregnant women. Literature suggests that pregnant women are not always adequately informed by their care provider about preventable infectious diseases and most pregnant women have a low level of knowledge regarding these topics. There is not much information about the actual risk behaviour of pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge and risk behaviour related to toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and CMV infection prevention in pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional survey among pregnant women from twenty midwifery practices across the Netherlands that participated in the DELIVER study, between October 2010 and December 2010. The questionnaire items covered respondents’ knowledge of preventive practices in general, risk behaviour, and sources of received information. Results: Of the 1,097 respondents (response 66.0%), 75.3% had heard, read or seen information about toxoplasmosis, 61.7% about listeriosis and 12.5% about CMV. The majority reported having heard about these infections from their care providers or read about these in printed media or on the Internet. Respondents showed limited knowledge about preventive practices for toxoplasmosis, listeriosis or CMV infection. Regarding toxoplasmosis, risk behaviour was more prevalent among respondents who had a high level of education, had the Dutch nationality, did not take folic acid during their first trimester, and had ever worked in a children day-care setting. Regarding listeriosis, risk behaviour was more prevalent among respondents who where in their third trimester. Regarding CMV infections, risk behaviour was less prevalent among respondents who were in their third trimester of pregnancy. Conclusion: Of the respondents, a substantial part did not have knowledge about preventive practices to avoid listeriosis, toxoplasmosis and CMV infections during pregnancy. Many pregnant women are appropriately avoiding risk behaviour, without knowing what they are avoiding. Advising pregnant women about behaviours and life-style habits to prevent infectious diseases remains important and information about preventive practices need to be complete and adequate. However, it may be less important to give pregnant women specific infectious diseases information. More attention towards CMV is necessary. (aut. ref.

Midwifery - a vital path to quality maternal and newborn care:the story of the Lancet Series on Midwifery

Objective: To re-assess the work and workload of primary care midwives in the Netherlands. Background: In the Netherlands most midwives work in primary care as independent practitioners in a midwifery practice with two or more colleagues. Each practice provides 24/7 care coverage through office hours and on-call hours of the midwives. In 2006 the results of a time registration project of primary care midwives were published as part of a 4-year monitor study. This time registration project was repeated, albeit on a smaller scale, in 2010. Method: As part of a larger study (the Deliver study) all midwives working in 20 midwifery practices kept a time register 24 hours a day, for one week. They also filled out questionnaires about their background, work schedules and experiences of workload. A second component of this study collected data from all midwifery practices in the Netherlands and included questions about practice size (number of midwives and number of clients in the previous year). Findings: In 2010, primary care midwives actually worked on average 32.6 hours per week and approximately 67% of their working time (almost 22 hours per week) was spent on client-related activities. On average a midwife was on-call for 39 hours a week and almost 13 of the 32.6 hours of work took place during on-call-hours. This means that the total hours that an average midwife was involved in her work (either actually working or on-call) was almost 59 hours a week. Compared to 2004 the number of hours an average midwife was actually working increased by 4 hours (from 29 to 32.6 hours) while the total number of hours an average midwife was involved with her work decreased by 6 hours (from 65 to 59 hours). In 2010, compared to 2001–2004, the midwives spent proportionally less time on direct client care (67% vs. 73%), although in actual number of hours this did not change much (22 vs. 21). In 2009 the average workload of a midwife was 99 clients at booking, 56 at the start of labour, 33 at childbirth, and 90 clients in postpartum care. Conclusion: The midwives worked on average more hours in 2010 than they did in 2004 or 2001, but spent these extra hours increasingly on non-client-related activities. (aut.ref.

Maternal cytomegalovirus infection prevention: the role of Dutch primary care midwives.

Objective: to assess the knowledge of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection among Dutch primary care midwives, and clinical approaches to informing women about CMV. Design: cross-sectional study, using self-administered questionnaires. Participants: 330 Dutch primary care midwives. Setting: primary midwifery care practices across the Netherlands. Main outcome: Midwives׳ knowledge of CMV transmission routes and maternal symptoms, and clinical practice behaviours regarding CMV, the information typically provided or reasons for not informing pregnant women about CMV. Findings: the overall median knowledge score was 8.0 out of a maximum possible score of 13.0. Of all participants, 10.6% reported always informing pregnant women about CMV infection prevention and 41.0% reported never informing pregnant women. The main reason indicated for not informing pregnant women was lack of knowledge about preventive methods (45.7%). Conclusion: Dutch primary care midwives have limited knowledge of CMV infection. Improvement in providing education to pregnant women about strategies to prevent CMV is necessary. (aut. ref.

Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy: knowledge, test practices, and attitudes of Dutch midwives.

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the Netherlands, testing for C. trachomatis is based on risk assessment. We assessed midwives' knowledge, test practices, assessment of risk behavior, and attitudes regarding testing for C. trachomatis infection during pregnancy. We evaluated the association between midwives' characteristics and their knowledge of C. trachomatis infection in terms of symptomatology and outcomes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among primary care midwives in the Netherlands. Between September and November 2011, midwives from all Dutch primary care midwifery practices were invited to complete a questionnaire about C. trachomatis infection. Results: Of the 518 midwives invited to participate in this study, 331 (63.9%) responded. The overall median knowledge score for questions about symptomatology and outcomes was 10 out of a maximum score of 15. The median knowledge score was higher among midwives in urban areas. In total, 239 (72.2%) midwives reported testing pregnant women for C. trachomatis. The primary reason for testing was a request by the woman herself (96.2%), followed by symptoms of infection (89.1%), risk behavior (59.3%), and risk factors for infection (7.3%). Almost 25% of midwives showed positive attitudes towards universal screening for C. trachomatis. Conclusions: Midwives were knowledgeable about symptoms of infection, but less about outcomes. Midwives test pregnant women for C. trachomatis mainly on the women's request. Otherwise, testing is based on symptoms of infection rather than on known risk factors. This may contribute to under-diagnosis and under-treatment, leading to maternal, perinatal, and neonatal morbidity. (aut.ref.

Experience with and amount of postpartum maternity care: comparing women who rated the care they received from the maternity care assistant as 'good' or 'less than good care'.

Objective: The postpartum period is an important time in the lives of new mothers, their children and their families. The aim of postpartum care is ‘to detect health problems of mother and/or baby at an early stage, to encourage breastfeeding and to give families a good start’ ( Wiegers, 2006 ). The Netherlands maternity care system aims to enable every new family to receive postpartum care in their home by a maternity care assistant (MCA). In order to better understand this approach, in this study we focus on women who experienced the postpartum care by the MCA as ‘less than good’ care. Our research questions are; among postpartum women in the Netherlands, what is the uptake of MCA care and what factors are significantly associated with women’s rating of care provided by the MCA. Design and setting This study uses data from the ‘DELIVER study’, a dynamic cohort study, which was set up to investigate the organization, accessibility and quality of primary midwifery care in the Netherlands. Participants In the DELIVER population 95.6% of the women indicated that they had received postpartum maternity care by an MCA in their home. We included the responses of 3170 women. Measurements and findings: To assess the factors that were significantly associated with reporting ‘less than good (postpartum) care’ by the MCA, a full cases backward logistic regression model was built using the multilevel approach in Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Findings: The mean rating of the postpartum care by the MCA was 8.8 (on a scale from 1-10), and 444 women (14%) rated the postpartum maternity care by the MCA as ‘less than good care’. In the full cases multivariable analysis model, odds of reporting ‘less than good care’ by the MCA were significantly higher for women who were younger (women 25-35 years had an OR 1.32, CI 0.96-1.81 and women 35 years), multiparous (OR 1.27, CI 1.01-1.60) and had a higher level of education (women with a middle level had an OR 1.84,CI 1.22-2.79, and women with a high level of education had an OR 2.11, CI 1.40-3.18 compared to women with a low level of education). Odds of reporting ‘less than good care’ were higher for women who, received the minimum amount of hours (OR 1.86, CI 1.45-2.38), in their opinion received not enough or too many hours maternity care assistance (OR 1.47, CI 1.01-2.15 and OR 5.15, CI 3.25-8.15, respectively), received care from two or more different MCAs (2 MCAs OR 1.61 CI 1.24-2.08, ≥3 MCAs OR 3.01, CI 1.98-4.56 compared to 1 MCA) and rated the care of the midwife as less than good care (OR 4.03, CI 3.10-5.25) . The odds of reporting ‘less than good care’ were lower for women whose reason for choosing maternity care assistance was to get information and advice (OR 0.52, CI 0.41-0.65). Key conclusions: We conclude that (the postpartum) MCA care is well utilised, and highly rated by most women. Implications for practice:The approach to care in the Netherlands addresses the needs as outlined by NICE and WHO. Although no data exists around the impact of use on maternal infant outcomes, this approach might be useful in other jurisdictions. MCA care might be improved if the hours of MCA care were tailored, and care by multiple MCAs minimised. (aut. ref.

Introducing video recording in primary care midwifery for research purposes: procedure, dataset, and use

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: video recording studies have been found to be complex; however very few studies describe the actual introduction and enrolment of the study, the resulting dataset and its interpretation. In this paper we describe the introduction and the use of video recordings of health care provider (HCP)-client interactions in primary care midwifery for research purposes. We also report on the process of data management, data coding and the resulting data set. METHODS: we describe our experience in undertaking a study using video recording to assess the interaction of the midwife and her client in the first antenatal consultation, in a real life clinical practice setting in the Netherlands. Midwives from six practices across the Netherlands were recruited to videotape 15-20 intakes. The introduction, complexity of the study and intrusiveness of the study were discussed within the research group. The number of valid recordings and missing recordings was measured; reasons not to participate, non-response analyses, and the inter-rater reliability of the coded videotapes were assessed. Video recordings were supplemented by questionnaires for midwives and clients. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) was used for coding as well as an obstetric topics scale. FINDINGS: at the introduction of the study, more initial hesitation in co-operation was found among the midwives than among their clients. The intrusive nature of the recording on the interaction was perceived to be minimal. The complex nature of the study affected recruitment and data collection. Combining the dataset with the questionnaires and medical records proved to be a challenge. The final dataset included videotapes of 20 midwives (7-23 recordings per midwife). Of the 460 eligible clients, 324 gave informed consent. The study resulted in a significant dataset of first antenatal consultations involving recording 269 clients and 194 partners. CONCLUSION: video recording of midwife-client interaction was both feasible and challenging and resulted in a unique dataset of recordings of midwife-client interaction. Video recording studies will benefit from a tight design, and vigilant monitoring during the data collection to ensure effective data collection. We provide suggestions to promote successful introduction of video recording for research purposes