Living in a low socioeconomic status neighbourhood is associated with lower cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after IVF treatment

Research question: Does an association exist between neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) and the cumulative rate of ongoing pregnancies after 2.5 years of IVF treatment? Design: A retrospective observational study involving 2669 couples who underwent IVF or IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment between 2006 and 2020. Neighbourhood SES for each couple was determined based on their residential postal code. Subsequently, SES was categorized into low (&lt;p20), medium (p20–p80), and high (&gt;p80). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted, with the cumulative ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years as the outcome variable. The SES category (reference category: high), female age (reference category: 32–36 years), body mass index (reference category: 23–25 kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), number of oocytes after the first ovarian stimulation, embryos usable for transfer or cryopreservation after the first cycle, duration of subfertility before treatment and insemination type were used as covariates. Results: A variation in ongoing pregnancy rates was observed among SES groups after the first fresh embryo transfer. No difference was found in the median number of IVF treatment cycles carried out. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates differed significantly between SES groups (low: 44%; medium: 51%; high: 56%; P &lt; 0.001). Low neighbourhood SES was associated with significantly lower odds for achieving an ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.84, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Low neighbourhood SES compared with high neighbourhood SES is associated with reducing odds of achieving an ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years of IVF treatment.</p

Living in a low socioeconomic status neighbourhood is associated with lower cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after IVF treatment

Research question: Does an association exist between neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) and the cumulative rate of ongoing pregnancies after 2.5 years of IVF treatment? Design: A retrospective observational study involving 2669 couples who underwent IVF or IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment between 2006 and 2020. Neighbourhood SES for each couple was determined based on their residential postal code. Subsequently, SES was categorized into low (&lt;p20), medium (p20–p80), and high (&gt;p80). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted, with the cumulative ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years as the outcome variable. The SES category (reference category: high), female age (reference category: 32–36 years), body mass index (reference category: 23–25 kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), number of oocytes after the first ovarian stimulation, embryos usable for transfer or cryopreservation after the first cycle, duration of subfertility before treatment and insemination type were used as covariates. Results: A variation in ongoing pregnancy rates was observed among SES groups after the first fresh embryo transfer. No difference was found in the median number of IVF treatment cycles carried out. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates differed significantly between SES groups (low: 44%; medium: 51%; high: 56%; P &lt; 0.001). Low neighbourhood SES was associated with significantly lower odds for achieving an ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.84, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Low neighbourhood SES compared with high neighbourhood SES is associated with reducing odds of achieving an ongoing pregnancy within 2.5 years of IVF treatment.</p

Women in Translational Medicine: Tools to Break the Glass Ceiling

Despite the recent movements for female equality and empowerment, few women occupy top positions in scientific decision-making. The challenges women face during their career may arise from societal biases and the current scientific culture. We discuss the effect of such biases at three different levels of the career and provide suggestions to tackle them. At the societal level, gender roles can create a negative feedback loop in which women are discouraged from attaining top positions and men are discouraged from choosing a home-centred lifestyle. This loop can be broken early in life by providing children with female role models that have a work-centred life and opening up the discussion about gender roles at a young age. At the level of hiring, unconscious biases can lead to a preference for male candidates. The introduction of (unbiased) artificial intelligence algorithms and gender champions in the hiring process may restore the balance and give men and women an equal chance. At the level of coaching and evaluation, barriers that women face should be addressed on a personal level through the introduction of coaching and mentoring programmes. In addition, women may play a pivotal role in shifting the perception of scientific success away from bibliometric outcomes only towards a more diverse assessment of quality and societal relevance. Taken together, these suggestions may break the glass ceiling in the scientific world for women; create more gender diversity at the top and improve translational science in medicine

Women in Translational Medicine: Tools to Break the Glass Ceiling

Despite the recent movements for female equality and empowerment, few women occupy top positions in scientific decision-making. The challenges women face during their career may arise from societal biases and the current scientific culture. We discuss the effect of such biases at three different levels of the career and provide suggestions to tackle them. At the societal level, gender roles can create a negative feedback loop in which women are discouraged from attaining top positions and men are discouraged from choosing a home-centred lifestyle. This loop can be broken early in life by providing children with female role models that have a work-centred life and opening up the discussion about gender roles at a young age. At the level of hiring, unconscious biases can lead to a preference for male candidates. The introduction of (unbiased) artificial intelligence algorithms and gender champions in the hiring process may restore the balance and give men and women an equal chance. At the level of coaching and evaluation, barriers that women face should be addressed on a personal level through the introduction of coaching and mentoring programmes. In addition, women may play a pivotal role in shifting the perception of scientific success away from bibliometric outcomes only towards a more diverse assessment of quality and societal relevance. Taken together, these suggestions may break the glass ceiling in the scientific world for women; create more gender diversity at the top and improve translational science in medicine

<b>The Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Glucose Regulation in Women with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</b>

BACKGROUNDBlood glucose regulation in women with diabetes mellitus may change during and after menopause, which could be attributed, in part, to decreased estrogen levels.PURPOSETo determine the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on HbA1c, fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, and use of glucose lowering drugs in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.DATA SOURCESA systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the clinicaltrials.gov registry to identify randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).STUDY SELECTIONWe selected RCTs on the effect of HT containing estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women (≥12 months since final menstrual period) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.DATA EXTRACTIONData were extracted for the following outcomes: HbA1c, fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, and the use of glucose lowering medication.DATA SYNTHESISNineteen RCTs were included (12 parallel-group trials and 7 crossover trials), with a total of 1,412 participants, of which 4.0% had type 1 diabetes. HT reduced HbA1c (mean difference -0.56% [95% CI -0.80, -0.31], -6.08 mmol/mol [95% CI -8.80, -3.36]) and fasting glucose (mean difference -1.15 mmol/L [95% CI -1.78, -0.51]).LIMITATIONSFifty percent of included studies were at high risk of bias.CONCLUSIONSWhen postmenopausal HT is being considered for menopausal symptoms in women with type 2 diabetes, HT is expected to have a neutral to beneficial impact on glucose regulation. Evidence for the effect of postmenopausal HT in women with type 1 diabetes was limited.</p

The Impact of Culture Medium on Morphokinetics of Cleavage Stage Embryos : An Observational Study

To study the impact of culture media on preimplantation morphokinetics used for predicting clinical outcomes. All IVF and ICSI cycles performed between 2012 and 2017 with time-lapse information available were included. In November 2014, culture medium was changed from Vitrolife G-1 PLUS to SAGE 1-Step. Each embryo was retrospectively assigned a morphokinetic-based KIDScore for prediction of implantation. Clinical outcomes were retrieved from medical records. Linear mixed models were used to study differences in morphokinetic parameters, a proportional odds model for KIDScore ranking and logistic regression for differences in clinical outcomes. All analyses were adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics. In 253 (63.1%) cycles, embryos (n = 671) were cultured in Vitrolife, and in 148 (36.9%) cycles, embryos (n = 517) were cultured in SAGE. All cleavage divisions occurred earlier for SAGE embryos than for Vitrolife embryos (2-cell: -2.28 (95%CI: -3.66, -0.89), 3-cell: -2.34 (95%CI: -4.00, -0.64), 4-cell: -2.41 (95%CI: -4.11, -0.71), 5-cell: -2.54 (95%CI: -4.90, -0.18), 6-cell: -3.58 (95%CI: -6.08, -1.08), 7-cell: -5.62 (95%CI: -8.80, -2.45) and 8-cell: -5.32 (95%CI: -9.21, -1.42) hours, respectively). Significantly more embryos cultured in SAGE classified for the highest KIDScore compared to embryos cultured in Vitrolife (p < 0.001). No differences were observed in clinical outcomes. Our results demonstrate an impact of culture medium on preimplantation embryo developmental kinetics, which affects classification within the KIDScore algorithm, while pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the groups. This study underscores the need to include the type of culture medium in the development of morphokinetic-based embryo selection tools

Time-lapse imaging of human embryos fertilized with testicular sperm reveals an impact on the first embryonic cell cycle

Testicular sperm is increasingly used during in vitro fertilization treatment. Testicular sperm has the ability to fertilize the oocyte after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), but they have not undergone maturation during epididymal transport. Testicular sperm differs from ejaculated sperm in terms of chromatin maturity, incidence of DNA damage, and RNA content. It is not fully understood what the biological impact is of using testicular sperm, on fertilization, preimplantation embryo development, and postimplantation development. Our goal was to investigate differences in human preimplantation embryo development after ICSI using testicular sperm (TESE-ICSI) and ejaculated sperm. We used time-lapse embryo culture to study these possible differences. Embryos (n = 639) originating from 208 couples undergoing TESE-ICSI treatment were studied and compared to embryos (n = 866) originating from 243 couples undergoing ICSI treatment with ejaculated sperm. Using statistical analysis with linear mixed models, we observed that pronuclei appeared 0.55 h earlier in TESE-ICSI embryos, after which the pronuclear stage lasted 0.55 h longer. Also, significantly more TESE-ICSI embryos showed direct unequal cleavage from the 1-cell stage to the 3-cell stage. TESE-ICSI embryos proceeded faster through the cleavage divisions to the 5- and the 6-cell stage, but this effect disappeared when we adjusted our model for maternal factors. In conclusion, sperm origin affects embryo development during the first embryonic cell cycle, but not developmental kinetics to the 8-cell stage. Our results provide insight into the biological differences between testicular and ejaculated sperm and their impact during human fertilization.</p

Skills or Pills: Randomized Trial Comparing Hypnotherapy to Medical Treatment in Children With Functional Nausea

Background & Aims: The potential effectiveness of gut-directed hypnotherapy (HT) is unknown for pediatric chronic nausea. This randomized controlled trial compared HT with standard medical treatment (SMT). Methods: One hundred children (ages, 8–18 y) with chronic nausea and fulfilling functional nausea (FN) or functional dyspepsia (FD) criteria were allocated randomly (1:1) to HT or SMT, with a 3-month intervention period. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at the halfway point, after treatment, and at the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluation. Children scored nausea symptoms in a 7-day diary. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as a reduction in nausea of 50% or more, at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Secondary outcomes included adequate relief of nausea. Results: After treatment and at the 6-month follow-up evaluation, there was a trend toward higher treatment success in the HT group compared with the SMT group (45% vs 26%, P =.052; and 57% vs 40%, P =.099, respectively). At 12 months, treatment success was similar in both groups (60% in the HT group and 55% in the SMT group; P =.667). In the FN group, significantly higher success rates were found for HT, but no differences were found in patients with FD. Adequate relief was significantly higher in the HT group than in the SMT group at the 6-month follow-up evaluation (children: 81% vs 55%, P =.014; parents: 79% vs 53%; P =.016), but not at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Conclusions: HT and SMT were effective in reducing nausea symptoms in children with FN and FD. In children with FN, HT was more effective than SMT during and after the first 6 months of treatment. Therefore, HT and SMT, applied separately or in combination, should be offered to children with FN as a treatment option (Clinical trials registration number: NTR5814)

Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotic Prescription in Patients With COVID-19:A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Despite the low rate of bacterial coinfection, antibiotics are very commonly prescribed in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the use of a procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic protocol safely reduce the use of antibiotics in patients with a COVID-19 infection? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter cohort, three groups of patients with COVID-19 were compared in terms of antibiotic consumption, namely one group treated based on a PCT-algorithm in one hospital (n = 216) and two control groups, consisting of patients from the same hospital (n = 57) and of patients from three similar hospitals (n = 486) without PCT measurements during the same period. The primary end point was antibiotic prescription in the first week of admission. RESULTS: Antibiotic prescription during the first 7 days was 26.8% in the PCT group, 43.9% in the non-PCT group in the same hospital, and 44.7% in the non-PCT group in other hospitals. Patients in the PCT group had lower odds of receiving antibiotics in the first 7 days of admission (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66 compared with the same hospital; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62 compared with the other hospitals). The proportion of patients receiving antibiotic prescription during the total admission was 35.2%, 43.9%, and 54.5%, respectively. The PCT group had lower odds of receiving antibiotics during the total admission only when compared with the other hospitals (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.63). There were no significant differences in other secondary end points, except for readmission in the PCT group vs the other hospitals group. INTERPRETATION: PCT-guided antibiotic prescription reduces antibiotic prescription rates in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, without major safety concerns

Women in translational medicine : Tools to break the glass ceiling

Despite the recent movements for female equality and empowerment, few women occupy top positions in scientific decision-making. The challenges women face during their career may arise from societal biases and the current scientific culture. We discuss the effect of such biases at three different levels of the career and provide suggestions to tackle them. At the societal level, gender roles can create a negative feedback loop in which women are discouraged from attaining top positions and men are discouraged from choosing a home-centred lifestyle. This loop can be broken early in life by providing children with female role models that have a work-centred life and opening up the discussion about gender roles at a young age. At the level of hiring, unconscious biases can lead to a preference for male candidates. The introduction of (unbiased) artificial intelligence algorithms and gender champions in the hiring process may restore the balance and give men and women an equal chance. At the level of coaching and evaluation, barriers that women face should be addressed on a personal level through the introduction of coaching and mentoring programmes. In addition, women may play a pivotal role in shifting the perception of scientific success away from bibliometric outcomes only towards a more diverse assessment of quality and societal relevance. Taken together, these suggestions may break the glass ceiling in the scientific world for women; create more gender diversity at the top and improve translational science in medicine