13 research outputs found

    Medical Student Milestones in Emergency Medicine

    Full text link
    Objectives Medical education is a continuum from medical school through residency to unsupervised clinical practice. There has been a movement toward competency‐based medical education prompted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ( ACGME ) using milestones to assess competence. While implementation of milestones for residents sets specific standards for transition to internship, there exists a need for the development of competency‐based instruments to assess medical students as they progress toward internship. The objective of this study was to develop competency‐based milestones for fourth‐year medical students completing their emergency medicine ( EM ) clerkships (regardless of whether the students were planning on entering EM ) using a rigorous method to attain validity evidence. Methods A literature review was performed to develop a list of potential milestones. An expert panel, which included a medical student and 23 faculty members (four program directors, 16 clerkship directors, and five assistant deans) from 19 different institutions, came to consensus on these milestones through two rounds of a modified Delphi protocol. The Delphi technique builds content validity and is an accepted method to develop consensus by eliciting expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires. Results Of the initial 39 milestones, 12 were removed at the end of round 1 due to low agreement on importance of the milestone or because of redundancy with other milestones. An additional 12 milestones were revised to improve clarity or eliminate redundancy, and one was added based on expert panelists' suggestions. Of the 28 milestones moving to round 2, consensus with a high level of agreement was achieved for 24. These were mapped to the ACGME EM residency milestone competency domains, as well as the Association of American Medical Colleges ( AAMC ) core entrustable professional activities for entering residency to improve content validity. Conclusions This study found consensus support by experts for a list of 24 milestones relevant to the assessment of fourth‐year medical student performance by the completion of their EM clerkships. The findings are useful for development of a valid method for assessing medical student performance as students approach residency. Resumen Objetivos La formación médica es un continuo que va desde la universidad, pasando por la residencia, hasta la práctica clínica no supervisada. Ha habido un movimiento hacia la formación médica basada en la adquisición de competencias promovido por el Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ( ACGME ) mediante los hitos para evaluar la competencia. Mientras la implementación de los hitos para los residentes establece normas específicas para la transición a residente, existe necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos basados en la competencia para evaluar a los estudiantes de medicina según progresan hacia la residencia. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar los hitos basados ​​en competencias para los estudiantes de medicina de cuarto año al completar sus prácticas clínicas en Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias ( MUE ) (indistintamente si el estudiante planeaba acceder a la MUE ) utilizando un método riguroso para lograr evidencia válida. Metodología Se realizó una revisión de la literatura para desarrollar una lista de hitos potenciales. Un panel de expertos, que incluyó 23 profesores de la facultad cuyas responsabilidades eran directores de programa (4), directores de prácticas clínicas (16), vicedecanos (5) y un estudiante de medicina de 19 instituciones diferentes, llegaron a un consenso sobre estos hitos a través de 2 rondas del protocolo de Delphi modificado. La técnica Delphi construye un contenido válido y es un método aceptado para desarrollar un consenso mediante la obtención de opiniones de expertos a través de múltiples rondas de preguntas. Resultados De los 39 hitos iniciales, se eliminaron 12 al final de la primera ronda debido al bajo acuerdo sobre la importancia del hito o debido a su redundancia con otros hitos. Se revisaron 12 hitos adicionales para mejorar la claridad o eliminar la redundancia, y se añadió uno basado en las sugerencias del panel de expertos. De los 28 hitos que llegaron a la segunda ronda, se alcanzó un consenso con un alto nivel de acuerdo para 24 de los hitos. Estos hitos se esquematizaron a los dominios de competencia de los hitos de la residencia de MUE del ACGME , así como a las actividades profesionales recomendadas para acceder a la residencia de la Association of American Medical Colleges ( AAMC ) para mejorar la validez de contenido. Conclusiones Este estudio llegó a un consenso apoyado por expertos para una lista de 24 hitos relevantes para evaluar el rendimiento de los estudiantes de medicina de cuarto año al finalizar su práctica clínica en MUE . Los hallazgos son útiles para el desarrollo de un método válido para evaluar el rendimiento de los estudiantes de medicina a medida que éstos se acercan a la residencia.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/1/acem12443-sup-0002-DataSupplementS2.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/2/acem12443.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/3/acem12443-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.pd

    The Extended Treatment Window’s Impact on Emergency Systems of Care for Acute Stroke

    Full text link
    The window for acute ischemic stroke treatment was previously limited to 4.5 hours for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and to 6 hours for thrombectomy. Recent studies using advanced imaging selection expand this window for select patients up to 24 hours from last known well. These studies directly affect emergency stroke management, including prehospital triage and emergency department (ED) management of suspected stroke patients. This narrative review summarizes the data expanding the treatment window for ischemic stroke to 24 hours and discusses these implications on stroke systems of care. It analyzes the implications on prehospital protocols to identify and transfer large‐vessel occlusion stroke patients, on issues of distributive justice, and on ED management to provide advanced imaging and access to thrombectomy centers. The creation of high‐performing systems of care to manage acute ischemic stroke patients requires academic emergency physician leadership attentive to the rapidly changing science of stroke care.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150496/1/acem13698.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150496/2/acem13698_am.pd

    The Extended Treatment Window\u27s Impact on Emergency Systems of Care for Acute Stroke.

    No full text
    The window for acute ischemic stroke treatment was previously limited to 4.5 hours for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and to 6 hours for thrombectomy. Recent studies using advanced imaging selection expand this window for select patients up to 24 hours from last known well. These studies directly affect emergency stroke management, including pre-hospital triage and emergency department management of suspected stroke patients. This narrative review summarizes the data expanding the treatment window for ischemic stroke to 24 hours and discusses these implications on stroke systems of care. It analyzes the implications on pre-hospital protocols to identify and transfer large vessel occlusion stroke patients, on issues of distributive justice, and on emergency department management to provide advanced imaging and access to thrombectomy centers. The creation of high-performing systems of care to manage acute ischemic stroke patients requires academic emergency physician leadership attentive to the rapidly changing science of stroke care. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

    The Impact of Emergency Physician Turnover on Planning for Prospective Clinical Trials

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Emergency physician (EP) turnover is a significant issue that can have strong economic impact on hospital systems, as well as implications on research efforts to test and improve clinical practice. This work is particularly important to researchers planning randomized trials directed toward EPs because a large degree of turnover within a physician group would attenuate the effectiveness of the desired intervention. We sought to determine the incidence and factors associated with EP workforce changes. METHODS: In an attempt to determine EP turnover and workforce change, data from the INSTINCT (INcreasing Stroke Treatment through INterventional behavior Change Tactics) trial were used. The INSTINCT trial is a prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled trial evaluating a targeted behavioral intervention to increase appropriate use of tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Individual EPs staffing each of the study hospitals were identified at baseline and 18 months. Surveys were sent to EPs at both intervals. Models were constructed to investigate relationships between physician/hospital characteristics and workforce change. RESULTS: A total of 278 EPs were identified at baseline. Surveys were sent to all EPs at baseline and 18 months with a response rate of 72% and 74%, respectively. At 18 months, 37 (15.8%) had left their baseline hospital and 66 (26.3%) new EPs were working. Seven EPs switched hospitals within the sample. The total number of EPs at 18 months was 307, a 10.8% overall increase. Among the 24 hospitals, 6 had no EP departures and 5 had no new arrivals. The median proportion of EP workforce departing by hospital was 16% (interquartile range [IQR] = 4%–25%; range = 0%–73%), and the median proportion added was 21% (IQR = 7%–41%; range = 0%–120%). None of the evaluated covariates investigating relationships between physician/hospital characteristics and workforce change were significant. CONCLUSION: EP workforce changes over an 18-month period were common. This has implications for emergency department directors, researchers, and individual EPs. Those planning research involving interventions upon EPs should account for turnover as it may have an impact when designing clinical trials to improve performance on healthcare delivery metrics for time-sensitive medical conditions such as stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or trauma

    The Impact of Emergency Physician Turnover on Planning for Prospective Clinical Trials

    No full text
    Introduction: Emergency physician (EP) turnover is a significant issue that can have strong economic impact on hospital systems, as well as implications on research efforts to test and improve clinical practice. This work is particularly important to researchers planning randomized trials directed toward EPs because a large degree of turnover within a physician group would attenuate the effectiveness of the desired intervention. We sought to determine the incidence and factors associated with EP workforce changes.Methods: In an attempt to determine EP turnover and workforce change, data from the INSTINCT (INcreasing Stroke Treatment through INterventional behavior Change Tactics) trial were used. The INSTINCT trial is a prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled trial evaluating a targeted behavioral intervention to increase appropriate use of tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Individual EPs staffing each of the study hospitals were identified at baseline and 18 months. Surveys were sent to EPs at both intervals. Models were constructed to investigate relationships between physician/hospital characteristics and workforce change.Results: A total of 278 EPs were identified at baseline. Surveys were sent to all EPs at baseline and 18 months with a response rate of 72% and 74%, respectively. At 18 months, 37 (15.8%) had left their baseline hospital and 66 (26.3%) new EPs were working. Seven EPs switched hospitals within the sample. The total number of EPs at 18 months was 307, a 10.8% overall increase. Among the 24 hospitals, 6 had no EP departures and 5 had no new arrivals. The median proportion of EP workforce departing by hospital was 16% (interquartile range [IQR] ¼ 4%–25%; range ¼ 0%–73%), and the median proportion added was 21% (IQR ¼ 7%–41%; range ¼ 0%–120%). None of the evaluatedcovariates investigating relationships between physician/hospital characteristics and workforce change were significant.Conclusion: EP workforce changes over an 18-month period were common. This has implications for emergency department directors, researchers, and individual EPs. Those planning research involvinginterventions upon EPs should account for turnover as it may have an impact when designing clinical trials to improve performance on healthcare delivery metrics for time-sensitive medical conditions suchas stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or trauma. [West J Emerg Med. 2013;14(1):16–22.

    Reporting achievement of medical student milestones to residency program directors: An educational handover

    No full text
    Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Problem Competency-based education, including assessment of specialty-specific milestones, has become the dominant medical education paradigm; however, how to determine baseline competency of entering interns is unclear - as is to whom this responsibility falls. Medical schools should take responsibility for providing residency programs with accurate, competency-based assessments of their graduates. Approach A University of Michigan ad hoc committee developed (spring 2013) a post-Match, milestone-based medical student performance evaluation for seven students matched into emergency medicine (EM) residencies. The committee determined EM milestone levels for each student based on assessments from the EM clerkship, end-of-third-year multistation standardized patient exam, EM boot camp elective, and other medical school data. Outcomes In this feasibility study, the committee assessed nearly all 23 EM milestones for all seven graduates, shared these performance evaluations with the program director (PD) where each student matched, and subsequently surveyed the PDs regarding this pilot. Of the five responding PDs, none reported using the traditional medical student performance evaluation to customize training, four (80%) indicated that the proposed assessment provided novel information, and 100% answered that the assessment would be useful for all incoming trainees. Next Steps An EM milestone-based, post-Match assessment that uses existing assessment data is feasible and may be effective for communicating competency-based information about medical school graduates to receiving residency programs. Next steps include further aligning assessments with competencies, determining the benefit of such an assessment for other specialties, and articulating the national need for an effective educational handover tool between undergraduate and graduate medical education institutions
    corecore