O Constructo Assédio Moral na Relação Aluno-Professor na Perspectiva de Professores Universitários.

O objetivo geral deste artigo é contribuir para uma melhor compreensão do constructo assédio moral na relação aluno-professor. Tal conceito, de cunho geral, leva ao questionamento de como esse constructo é compreendido por professores universitários que o vivenciam em suas práticas de trabalho. No sentido de responder ao questionamento, foram realizadas 42 entrevistas com docentes universitários. Os dados coletados foram tabulados e organizados por meio da metodologia do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo (DSC). Os resultados indicam seis discursos coletivos, que têm como ideias-chave: constrangimento ao professor, pressão para obter vantagens, falta de respeito, condutas difamatórias recorrentes, obstáculos ao propósito da docência e ameaça à integridade moral e física. O aprofundamento do entendimento do assédio moral na relação aluno-professor é relevante, pois contribui para uma maior consciência e reflexão sobre comportamentos destrutivos que não são mais aceitáveis no estágio evolutivo da sociedade moderna e, sobretudo, que ainda ocorrem em um grupo social no qual se propõe precipuamente formar cidadãos socialmente responsáveis e moralmente íntegros.The general purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the construct mobbing in professor-student relationship. This concept, of general nature, leads to the question of how this construct is understood by university professors who experience it in their working practices. In order to answer the question, 42 interviews were conducted with university professors. The collected data were tabulated and organized through the methodology of the Collective Subject Discourse (CSD). The results indicate six Collective Subject Discourses, whose key ideas are: embarrassment to the teacher, pressure to obtain benefits, disrespectfulness, recurring defamatory behavior, obstacles to the purpose of teaching and threat to moral and physical integrity. The deepening of the understanding of mobbing in the student-professor relationship is important because it contributes to an increased awareness and reflection on destructive behaviors that are no longer acceptable in the evolutionary stage of modern society and that, above all, still occur in a social group where the purpose is to educate socially responsible citizens and of morally integrity.El objetivo general de este artículo es contribuir en el sentido de una mejor comprensión del constructo acoso moral en la relación alumno-profesor. Tal concepto, de carácter general, lleva al cuestionamiento de cómo ese constructo es comprendido por profesores universitarios que lo padecen en sus prácticas de trabajo. Con la intención de responder al cuestionamiento, fueron realizadas 42 entrevistas con docentes universitarios. Los datos recolectados fueron tabulados y organizados mediante la metodología del Discurso del Sujeto Colectivo (DSC). Los resultados indican seis discursos colectivos, que tienen como ideas-clave: avergonzar al profesor, presión para obtener ventajas, falta de respeto, conductas difamatorias recurrentes, obstáculos al propósito de la docencia y amenaza a la integridad moral y física. La profundización del entendimiento del acoso moral en la relación alumno-profesor es relevante, pues contribuye para una mayor conciencia y reflexión sobre comportamientos destructivos que no son más aceptables en la etapa evolutiva de la sociedad moderna y, sobretodo, que todavía ocurren en un grupo social en el cual se propone principalmente formar ciudadanos socialmente responsables y moralmente íntegros

El Constructo Acoso Moral en la Relación Alumno-Profesor en la Perspectiva de Profesores Universitarios.

The general purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the construct mobbing in professor-student relationship. This concept, of general nature, leads to the question of how this construct is understood by university professors who experience it in their working practices. In order to answer the question, 42 interviews were conducted with university professors. The collected data were tabulated and organized through the methodology of the Collective Subject Discourse (CSD). The results indicate six Collective Subject Discourses, whose key ideas are: embarrassment to the teacher, pressure to obtain benefits, disrespectfulness, recurring defamatory behavior, obstacles to the purpose of teaching and threat to moral and physical integrity. The deepening of the understanding of mobbing in the student-professor relationship is important because it contributes to an increased awareness and reflection on destructive behaviors that are no longer acceptable in the evolutionary stage of modern society and that, above all, still occur in a social group where the purpose is to educate socially responsible citizens and of morally integrity

NEOTROPICAL ALIEN MAMMALS: a data set of occurrence and abundance of alien mammals in the Neotropics

Biological invasion is one of the main threats to native biodiversity. For a species to become invasive, it must be voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into a nonnative habitat. Mammals were among first taxa to be introduced worldwide for game, meat, and labor, yet the number of species introduced in the Neotropics remains unknown. In this data set, we make available occurrence and abundance data on mammal species that (1) transposed a geographical barrier and (2) were voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into the Neotropics. Our data set is composed of 73,738 historical and current georeferenced records on alien mammal species of which around 96% correspond to occurrence data on 77 species belonging to eight orders and 26 families. Data cover 26 continental countries in the Neotropics, ranging from Mexico and its frontier regions (southern Florida and coastal-central Florida in the southeast United States) to Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay, and the 13 countries of Caribbean islands. Our data set also includes neotropical species (e.g., Callithrix sp., Myocastor coypus, Nasua nasua) considered alien in particular areas of Neotropics. The most numerous species in terms of records are from Bos sp. (n = 37,782), Sus scrofa (n = 6,730), and Canis familiaris (n = 10,084); 17 species were represented by only one record (e.g., Syncerus caffer, Cervus timorensis, Cervus unicolor, Canis latrans). Primates have the highest number of species in the data set (n = 20 species), partly because of uncertainties regarding taxonomic identification of the genera Callithrix, which includes the species Callithrix aurita, Callithrix flaviceps, Callithrix geoffroyi, Callithrix jacchus, Callithrix kuhlii, Callithrix penicillata, and their hybrids. This unique data set will be a valuable source of information on invasion risk assessments, biodiversity redistribution and conservation-related research. There are no copyright restrictions. Please cite this data paper when using the data in publications. We also request that researchers and teachers inform us on how they are using the data

NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data