Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to AZD9291 A Mutation-Selective, Irreversible EGFR Inhibitor

IntroductionAZD9291, a third-generation and mutation-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is active against patients with EGFRT790M-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed prior treatment with EGFR TKIs. However, acquired resistance to AZD9291 is inevitable. In this study, we identified the mechanisms of acquired resistance to AZD9291 in EGFRT790M-mutant NSCLC.MethodsFour NSCLC patients with both an EGFR exon 19 deletion and the EGFRT790M mutation after developing acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR TKIs received AZD9291 at doses of 20 to 80 mg/day in a phase I trial (NCT01802632). Paired tumor samples before and after treatment were obtained to evaluate EGFR modifications, alternative pathway activation, and histologic transformation. Genetic alterations were analyzed using Sanger sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and targeted exome sequencing.ResultsAll four patients achieved a partial response (median duration of response, 9 months [range, 9–11 months]) and subsequently showed resistance to AZD9291. EGFRT790M-mutant clones depopulated AZD9291-resistant tumors to below 1% (baseline, 14%–36%) in three patients with progression: one with the loss of EGFRLREAT747del/T790M-double mutant clones and two accompanied by transformation to small-cell carcinoma and focal fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification, respectively. EGFRT790M-mutant clones remained and the EGFR ligand was overexpressed in one patient with focal progression to AZD9291.ConclusionAcquired resistance mechanisms of AZD9291 in patients with EGFRT790M-mutant NSCLC who failed treatment with first-generation EGFR TKIs include the loss of EGFRT790M-mutant clones plus alternative pathway activation or histologic transformation and EGFR ligand–dependent activation

Application of Cancer Genomics to Solve Unmet Clinical Needs

The large amount of data on cancer genome research has contributed to our understanding of cancer biology. Indeed, the genomics approach has a strong advantage for analyzing multi-factorial and complicated problems, such as cancer. It is time to think about the actual usage of cancer genomics in the clinical field. The clinical cancer field has lots of unmet needs in the management of cancer patients, which has been defined in the pre-genomic era. Unmet clinical needs are not well known to bioinformaticians and even non-clinician cancer scientists. A personalized approach in the clinical field will bring potential additional challenges to cancer genomics, because most data to now have been population-based rather than individual-based. We can maximize the use of cancer genomics in the clinical field if cancer scientists, bioinformaticians, and clinicians think and work together in solving unmet clinical needs. In this review, we present one imaginary case of a cancer patient, with which we can think about unmet clinical needs to solve with cancer genomics in the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, monitoring the status of cancer, and personalized treatment decision

Molecular changes associated with acquired resistance to crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: Although ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is sensitive to crizotinib, development of resistance is inevitable. Here, we identified molecular alterations in crizotinib-resistant tumors from two NSCLC patients with the CD74-ROS1 rearrangement, and in HCC78 cells harboring SLC34A2-ROS1 that showed resistance to crizotinib (HCC78CR cells). Experimental Design: ROS1 kinase domain mutations were examined in fresh tumor tissues from two NSCLC patients and HCC78CR1-3 cells by direct sequencing. Ba/F3 cells expressing ROS1 secondary mutations were constructed to evaluate resistance to crizotinib. An upregulated pathway was identified using phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase array, EGFR signaling antibody array, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Cell proliferation and ROS1 downstream signaling pathways were compared between HCC78 and HCC78CR1-3 cells. Results: The ROS1 G2032R mutation was identified in crizotinib-resistant tumors from one patient. Furthermore, HCC78CR1 and CR2 cells harbored a novel ROS1 L2155S mutation (73.3% and 76.2%, respectively). ROS1 G2032R and L2155S mutations conferred resistance to crizotinib in Ba/F3 cells. Evidence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition with downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin was observed in HCC78CR1-2 cells and in the other patient. RNA-seq and EGFR signaling antibody array revealed that the EGFR pathway was significantly upregulated in HCC78CR3 versus HCC78 cells. Cells with the ROS1 mutation and upregulated EGFR were sensitive to foretinib, an inhibitor of c-MET, VEGFR2, and ROS1 and irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus crizotinib, respectively. Conclusions: Molecular changes associated with acquired crizotinib resistance in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC are heterogeneous, including ROS1 tyrosine kinase mutations, EGFR activation, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. (C)2015 AACR.

Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to AZD9291 A Mutation-Selective, Irreversible EGFR Inhibitor

Introduction: AZD9291, a third-generation and mutation-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is active against patients with EGFR(T790M)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed prior treatment with EGFR TKIs. However, acquired resistance to AZD9291 is inevitable. In this study, we identified the mechanisms of acquired resistance to AZD9291 in EGFR(T790M)-mutant NSCLC. Methods: Four NSCLC patients with both an EGFR exon 19 deletion and the EGFR(T790M) mutation after developing acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR TKIs received AZD9291 at doses of 20 to 80 mg/day in a phase I trial (NCT01802632). Paired tumor samples before and after treatment were obtained to evaluate EGFR modifications, alternative pathway activation, and histologic transformation. Genetic alterations were analyzed using Sanger sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and targeted exome sequencing. Results: All four patients achieved a partial response (median duration of response, 9 months [range, 9-11 months]) and subsequently showed resistance to AZD9291. EGFR(T790M)-mutant clones depopulated AZD9291-resistant tumors to below 1% (baseline, 14%-36%) in three patients with progression: one with the loss of EGFR(LREAT747del/T790M)-double mutant clones and two accompanied by transformation to small-cell carcinoma and focal fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification, respectively. EGFR(T790M)-mutant clones remained and the EGFR ligand was overexpressed in one patient with focal progression to AZD9291. Conclusion: Acquired resistance mechanisms of AZD9291 in patients with EGFR(T790M)-mutant NSCLC who failed treatment with first-generation EGFR TKIs include the loss of EGFR(T790M)-mutant clones plus alternative pathway activation or histologic transformation and EGFR ligand-dependent activation.