Duration of Hyperemia With Intracoronary Administration of Papaverine.

Research Lette

Mismatch between morphological and functional assessment of the length of coronary artery disease

Background: Morphological evaluation of coronary lesion length is a paramount step during invasive assessment of coronary artery disease. Likewise, the extent of epicardial pressure losses can be measured using longitudinal vessel interrogation with fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. We aimed to quantify the mismatch in lesion length between morphological (based on quantitative coronary angiography, QCA, and optical coherence tomography, OCT) and functional evaluations. Methods: This is a prospective and multicenter study of patients evaluated by QCA, OCT and motorized fractional flow reserve pullbacks (mFFR). The difference in lesion length between the functional and anatomical evaluations was referred to as FAM. Results: 117 patients (131 vessels) were included. Median lesion length derived from angiography was 16.05 mm [11.40–22.05], from OCT was 28.00 mm [16.63–38.00] and from mFFR 67.12 mm [25.38–91.37]. There was no correlation between QCA and mFFR lesion length (r = 0.124, 95% CI -0.168-0.396, p = 0.390). OCT lesion length did correlate with mFFR (r = 0.469, 95% CI 0.156–0.696, p = 0.004). FAM was strongly associated with the improvement in vessel conductance with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), higher mismatch was associated with lower post-PCI FFR. Conclusions: Lesion length assessment differs between morphological and functional evaluations. The morphological-functional mismatch in lesion length is frequent, and influences the results of PCI in terms of post-PCI FFR. Integration of the extent of pressure losses provides clinically relevant information that may be useful for clinical decision-making concerning revascularization strategy

Validation of coronary angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve in heart transplant patients with suspected graft vasculopathy

Cardiac transplant-related vasculopathy remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Recently, coronary angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has emerged as a new diagnostic computational tool to functionally evaluate the severity of coronary artery disease. Although vFFR estimates have been shown to perform well against invasive FFR in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, data on the use of vFFR in heart transplant recipients suffering from cardiac transplant-related arteriopathy are lacking. The aim of the presented study was to validate coronary angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve to calculate fractional flow reserve in HTx patients with and without cardiac transplant-related vasculopathy. A prospective, single center study of HTx patients referred for annual check-up, undergoing surveillance coronarography was conducted. Invasive FFR was measured using a motorized device at the speed of 1.0 mm/s in all three major coronary arteries. Angiography-derived pullback FFR was derived from the angiogram and compared with invasive FFR pullback curve. Overall, 18,059 FFR values were extracted from the FFR pullback curves from 23 HTx patients. The mean age was 59.3 ± 9.7 years, the mean time after transplantation was 5.24 years [IQR 1.20, 11.25]. A total of 39 vessels from 23 patients (24 LAD, 11 LCX, 4 RCA) were analyzed. Mean distal vFFR was 0.87 ± 0.14 whereas invasive distal FFR was 0.88 ± 0.17. An excellent correlation was found between invasive distal FFR and vFFR (r = 0.92; p < 0.001). The correlation of the pullback tracing was high, with a correlation coefficient between vFFR and invasive FFR pullback values of 0.72 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.73, p < 0.001). The mean difference between vFFR and invasive FFR pullback values was −0.01 with 0.06 of SD (limits of agreements −0.12 to 0.13). In HTx patients, coronary angiography-derived FFR correlates excellently with invasively measured wire-derived FFR. Therefore, angiography derived FFR could be used as a novel diagnostic tool to quantify the functional severity of graft vasculopathy

Head-to-head comparison of two angiography-derived fractional flow reserve techniques in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome: A multicenter prospective study.

FFRangio and QFR are angiography-based technologies that have been validated in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No head-to-head comparison to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported to date in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This study is a subset of a larger prospective multicenter, single-arm study that involved patients diagnosed with high-risk ACS in whom 30-70% stenosis was evaluated by FFR. FFRangio and QFR - both calculated offline by 2 different and blinded operators - were calculated and compared to FFR. The two co-primary endpoints were the comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficient between FFRangio and QFR with FFR and the comparison of their inter-observer variability. Among 134 high-risk ACS screened patients, 59 patients with 84 vessels underwent FFR measurements and were included in this study. The mean FFR value was 0.82 ± 0.40 with 32 (38%) being ≤0.80. The mean FFRangio was 0.82 ± 0.20 and the mean QFR was 0.82 ± 0.30, with 27 (32%) and 25 (29%) being ≤0.80, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was significantly better for FFRangio compared to QFR, with R values of 0.76 and 0.61, respectively (p = 0.01). The inter-observer agreement was also significantly better for FFRangio compared to QFR (0.86 vs 0.79, p < 0.05). FFRangio had 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy, while QFR exhibited 86.4% sensitivity, 98.4% specificity, and 93.7% accuracy. In patients with high-risk ACS, FFRangio and QFR demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. FFRangio seems to have better correlation to invasive FFR compared to QFR but further larger validation studies are required

Simplified Assessment of the Index of Microvascular Resistance

Background. To validate a simplified invasive method for the calculation of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR). Methods. This is a prospective, single-center study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes presenting with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. IMR was obtained using both intravenous (IV) adenosine and intracoronary (IC) papaverine. Each IMR measurement was obtained in duplicate. The primary objective was the agreement between IMR acquired using adenosine and papaverine. Secondary objectives include reproducibility of IMR and time required for the IMR measurement. Results. One hundred and sixteen IMR measurements were performed in 29 patients. The mean age was 68.8 ± 7.24 years, and 27.6% was diabetics. IMR values were similar between papaverine and adenosine (17.7 ± 7.26 and 20.1 ± 8.6, p=0.25; Passing-Bablok coefficient A 0.58, 95% CI -2.42 to 3.53; coefficient B 0.90, 95% CI -0.74 to 1.07). The reproducibility of IMR was excellent with both adenosine and papaverine (ICC 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88 and ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97). The time needed for microvascular assessment was significantly shortened by the use of IC papaverine (3.23 (2.84, 3.78) mins vs. 5.48 (4.94, 7.09) mins, p<0.0001). Conclusion. IMR can be reliably measured using IC papaverine with similar results compared to intravenous infusion of adenosine with increased reproducibility and reduced procedural time. This approach simplifies the invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation in the catheterization laboratory

Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Invasive Assessment of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow and Microvascular Resistance Reserve

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an early feature of diabetic cardiomyopathy, which usually precedes the onset of diastolic and systolic dysfunction. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution allows an accurate and reproducible assessment of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance thus allowing the evaluation of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and Microvascular Resistance Reserve (MRR), a novel index specific for microvascular function, which is independent from the myocardial mass. In the present study we compared absolute coronary flow and resistance, CFR and MRR assessed by continuous intracoronary thermodilution in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), an early marker of diastolic dysfunction was compared between the two groups. Methods: In this observational retrospective study, 108 patients with suspected angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) consecutively undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG) from September 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled. The invasive functional assessment of microvascular function was performed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with intracoronary continuous thermodilution. Patients were classified according to the presence of DM. Absolute resting and hyperemic coronary blood flow (in mL/min) and resistance (in WU) were compared between the two cohorts. FFR was measured to assess coronary epicardial lesions, while CFR and MRR were calculated to assess microvascular function. LAS, assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography, was used to detect early myocardial structural changes potentially associated with microvascular dysfunction. Results: The median FFR value was 0.83 [0.79–0.87] without any significant difference between the two groups. Absolute resting and hyperemic flow in the left anterior descending coronary were similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Similarly, resting and hyperemic resistances did not change significantly between the two groups. In the DM cohort the CFR and MRR were significantly lower compared to the control group (CFR = 2.38 ± 0.61 and 2.88 ± 0.82; MRR = 2.79 ± 0.87 and 3.48 ± 1.02 for diabetic and non-diabetic patients respectively, [p<0.05 for both]). Likewise, diabetic patients had a significantly lower reservoir, contractile and conductive LAS (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with non-diabetic patients, CFR and MRR were lower in patients with DM and non-obstructive epicardial coronary arteries, while both resting and hyperemic coronary flow and resistance were similar. LASr was lower in diabetic patients, confirming the presence of a subclinical diastolic dysfunction associated to the microcirculatory impairment. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution-derived indexes provide a reliable and operator-independent assessment of coronarymacro- and microvasculature and might potentially facilitate widespread clinical adoption of invasive physiologic assessment of suspected microvascular disease.Continuousvariablesarepresentedasmean ±SDormedian[IQR]. DS, Diameter Stenosis; FFR, Fractional Flow Reserve; Qrest, Resting Flow; Qrest−N, Normalized Resting Flow (Qrest/FFR); Rμ−rest, Absolute Microvascular Resistance at Rest; Qhyp, Hyperemic Flow; Qhyp−N, Normalized Hyperemic Flow; Rμ−hyp, Absolute MicrovascularResistance;CFR,CoronaryFlowReserve;MRR,Microvascularresistance Reserve; Repi, Epicardial Resistance (= Pa − Pd )/Q); Rtot, Total Coronary Resistance (=Pa/Q)

Microvascular Resistance Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: JACC Technology Corner

The need for a quantitative and operator-independent assessment of coronary microvascular function is increasingly recognized. We propose the theoretical framework of microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) as an index specific for the microvasculature, independent of autoregulation and myocardial mass, and based on operator-independent measurements of absolute values of coronary flow and pressure. In its general form, MRR equals coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) corrected for driving pressures. In 30 arteries, pressure, temperature, and flow velocity measurements were obtained simultaneously at baseline (BL), during infusion of saline at 10 mL/min (rest) and 20 mL/min (hyperemia). A strong correlation was found between continuous thermodilution-derived MRR and Doppler MRR (r = 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.93; P < 0.001). MRR was independent from the epicardial resistance, the lower the FFR value, the greater the difference between MRR and CFR. Therefore, MRR is proposed as a specific, quantitative, and operator-independent metric to quantify coronary microvascular dysfunction

Coronary Atherosclerosis Phenotypes in Focal and Diffuse Disease.

The interplay between coronary hemodynamics and plaque characteristics remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare atherosclerotic plaque phenotypes between focal and diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) defined by coronary hemodynamics. This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study was conducted in 5 countries. Patients with functionally significant lesions based on an invasive fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 were included. Plaque analysis was performed by using coronary computed tomography angiography and optical coherence tomography. CAD patterns were assessed using motorized fractional flow reserve pullbacks and quantified by pullback pressure gradient (PPG). Focal and diffuse CAD was defined according to the median PPG value. A total of 117 patients (120 vessels) were included. The median PPG was 0.66 (IQR: 0.54-0.75). According to coronary computed tomography angiography analysis, plaque burden was higher in patients with focal CAD (87% ± 8% focal vs 82% ± 10% diffuse; P = 0.003). Calcifications were significantly more prevalent in patients with diffuse CAD (Agatston score per vessel: 51 [IQR: 11-204] focal vs 158 [IQR: 52-341] diffuse; P = 0.024). According to optical coherence tomography analysis, patients with focal CAD had a significantly higher prevalence of circumferential lipid-rich plaque (37% focal vs 4% diffuse; P = 0.001) and thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (47% focal vs 10% diffuse; P = 0.002). Focal disease defined by PPG predicted the presence of TCFA with an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.87). Atherosclerotic plaque phenotypes associate with intracoronary hemodynamics. Focal CAD had a higher plaque burden and was predominantly lipid-rich with a high prevalence of TCFA, whereas calcifications were more prevalent in diffuse CAD. (Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan [P3]; NCT03782688)