4 research outputs found

    Prognostic factors in treatment for low-grade brain supratentorial infiltrative gliomas

    No full text
    The study showed the results of univariate and multivariate analyses of treatment of patients with low-grade brain supratentorial infiltrative gliomas. It was reaffirmed the importance of the most significance of such adverse prognostic factors as histology, tumor size, displacement of midline structures of the brain, age and neurological deficit. When assessing the prognostic significance of severity of the debut of clinical symptoms in this category of neuro-oncological patients as well as radical surgical treatment of the primary tumor there were obtained data confirming the absence of their independent prognostic significance

    Prognostic factors in treatment for low-grade brain supratentorial infiltrative gliomas

    No full text
    The study showed the results of univariate and multivariate analyses of treatment of patients with low-grade brain supratentorial infiltrative gliomas. It was reaffirmed the importance of the most significance of such adverse prognostic factors as histology, tumor size, displacement of midline structures of the brain, age and neurological deficit. When assessing the prognostic significance of severity of the debut of clinical symptoms in this category of neuro-oncological patients as well as radical surgical treatment of the primary tumor there were obtained data confirming the absence of their independent prognostic significance

    ВозмоТности типирования Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ с использованиСм ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ОВ-ПЦР

    No full text
    Introduction. Adjuvant systemic therapy remains one of the main options for treating breast cancer. Results of standard immunohistochemical studies are not always a criterion for selecting systemic therapy. Nowadays, multigene expression analysis is actively used to predict the response to chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We studied a 24-gene multi-gene panel for typing breast cancer. Material and Methods. A prospective analysis of 199 breast cancer patients (T1-3N0-3M0) was carried out. Surgical specimens were studied using the standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR for detecting expression of 24 genes. Results. According to the IHC results, breast cancer was divided into 5 molecular subtypes: luminal A was detected in 59 (30 %) patients; luminal B (HER2-negative) in 52 (26 %); luminal B (HER2-positive) in 19 (9 %); triple-negative in 28 (14 %); HER2-positive 41 (21 %). RT-PCR showed that STK15, MYC, MYBL2, BIRCC5, BCL2, TERT, ESRP1, PGR, HER2, GBR7, MGB1 and MMP11 were the most significant genes in subtype distribution. The total percentage of matches between the two studies was 61.7 %. Conclusion. Studies have shown the need to add additional typing methods for breast cancer to a standard IHC study, which will undoubtedly increase the information content of diagnostic measures and will improve the effectiveness of the treatment.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ΄ΡŠΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½Π°Ρ систСмная тСрапия остаСтся ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· основных ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² лСчСния Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ стандартного иммуногистохимичСского исслСдования Π½Π΅ всСгда Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ для Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° систСмной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. Для прогнозирования эффСктивности лСчСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… стадиях Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ примСняСтся ΠΌΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ экспрСссионный Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·. Π‘Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π° отСчСствСнная ΠΌΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ панСль, состоящая ΠΈΠ· 24 Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π°Ρ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΡΡ проспСктивный Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· 199 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π ΠœΠ– (T1-3N0-3M0), Π² Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» подвСргался стандартному иммуногистохимичСскому исслСдованию, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ изучался ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ОВ-ПЦР с выявлСниСм экспрСссии 24 Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ². Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. По Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ Π˜Π“Π₯ ΠΎΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ молСкулярноС Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π ΠœΠ– с Π²Ρ‹Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ 5 ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²: Π»ΡŽΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ А Π±Ρ‹Π» выявлСн Ρƒ 59 (30 %) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…; Π»ΡŽΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π’ (HER2-Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ) -Ρƒ 52 (26 %); Π»ΡŽΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π’ (HER2-ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ) - Ρƒ 19 (9 %); Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΆΠ΄Ρ‹ Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ - Ρƒ 28 (14 %); HER2-ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ - Ρƒ 41 (21 %) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°. По Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ОВ-ПЦР Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π² распрСдСлСнии Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡ‹ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ являлись: STK15, MYC, MYBL2, BIRCC5, BCL2, TERT, ESRP1, PGR, HER2, GBR7, MGB1 ΠΈ MMP11. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ дальнСйшСм Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ суммарноС число совпадСний Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄Π²ΡƒΡ… исслСдований составило 61,7 %. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ исслСдования продСмонстрировали Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ добавлСния Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² типирования Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΠΊ стандартному Π˜Π“Π₯-исслСдованию, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ, нСсомнСнно, повысит ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ диагностичСских мСроприятий ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСчСния

    Breast cancer typing using RT-PCR assay [Π²ΠžΠ—ΠœΠžΠ–Π½ΠžΠ‘Π’ΠΈ Π’ΠΈΠŸΠΈΡ€ΠžΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ― Ρ€Π°ΠšΠ° ΠœΠžΠ›ΠžΠ§Π½ΠžΠΉ Π–Π΅Π›Π΅Π—Ρ‹ Π‘ ΠΈΠ‘ΠŸΠžΠ›ΡŒΠ—ΠžΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅Πœ МСВОдиКи ОВ-ΠŸΠ¦Ρ€]

    No full text
    Introduction. adjuvant systemic therapy remains one of the main options for treating breast cancer. Results of standard immunohistochemical studies are not always a criterion for selecting systemic therapy. Nowadays, multigene expression analysis is actively used to predict the response to chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We studied a 24-gene multi-gene panel for typing breast cancer. Material and Methods. a prospective analysis of 199 breast cancer patients (t1–3N0–3M0) was carried out. surgical specimens were studied using the standard immunohistochemistry (IHc) and Rt-PcR for detecting expression of 24 genes. Results. according to the IHc results, breast cancer was divided into 5 molecular subtypes: luminal a was detected in 59 (30 %) patients; luminal B (HER2-negative) in 52 (26 %); luminal B (HER2-positive) in 19 (9 %); triple-negative in 28 (14 %); HER2-positive 41 (21 %). Rt-PcR showed that stK15, MYc, MYBL2, BIRcc5, BcL2, tERt, EsRP1, PGR, HER2, GBR7, MGB1 and MMP11 were the most significant genes in subtype distribution. the total percentage of matches between the two studies was 61.7 %. Conclusion. studies have shown the need to add additional typing methods for breast cancer to a standard IHc study, which will undoubtedly increase the information content of diagnostic measures and will improve the effectiveness of the treatment. Β© 2019 Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved
    corecore