Perspective of Medical and Dental Undergraduates towards Complementary and Alternative Medicine

ABSTRACT Background: The prevalent use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) requires health professionals including doctors and dentists having the essential knowledge to have better recommend their patients. This has lead to an increased need for integration of CAM teaching at the undergraduate level. Thus, the purpose of the study was to assess the perspective of complementary and alternative medicine among Pakistani medical and dental undergraduates. Methods: A questionnaire based cross sectional survey was conducted among first to fifth year undergraduate medical and dental students at Sindh Medical College and Ziauddin University in Karachi, during April until May 2019, using a structured 13-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline characteristics. Frequency and proportions were calculated for categorical variables using SPSS version 20. Results: The response rate was 100% (40.7% for males and 59.3% for females). The mean age of medical and dental students was 20.5±1.39 years. Almost three-fourth of students (75.1%) had the knowledgeof CAM. The most experienced CAM modality amongst all was Yoga (23.4%) and Homeopathy (20%). Nearly 69.4 % of students believed that CAM is beneficial for medical and dental healthcare and 44.1% students will recommend CAM to their patients in future. Almost 39% of students think that CAM should be included into undergraduate medical and dental curriculum. Conclusion: This study showed an encouraging interpretation of both medical and dental students regarding CAM knowledge and benefits. Majority of the students have optimistic attitude towards CAM practice in future and for the integration of CAM studies at undergraduate level

Regulatory Science Transparency: Assessment Of Environmental Protection Agency’s Proposed Rule on Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science

In its proposed rule, Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires transparency in certain areas of regulatory science. The proposed rule mandates public access to the details of studies that address dose response and models. This paper is the result of a study conducted by graduate students at Georgetown University. The study relied upon a specific process for selecting a small number from an exceptionally large number of responses to study the subject. The evaluation of the responses was largely based on Best Available Regulatory Science (BARS) and Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims derived from BARS. The results of the study indicate that opposition to the EPA's proposed rule is largely based on the claim that its implementation would eliminate key studies that contain confidential data from consideration during the regulatory process. Although the proposed rule would allow exemptions from the public access requirements, there is opposition to making exemptions available at the discretion of the EPA Administrator. The study concluded that a regulatory science process called "controlled transparency" would be a reasonable solution to compliance with transparency requirements while protecting confidential information.https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v07moghiss