LA PRODUCTIVIDAD EN LA DÉCADA DEL 2010: CARACTERIZACIÓN Y PROPUESTAS DE MEJORA EN LAS TÉCNICAS DE ESTUDIO DE MÉTODOS Y TIEMPOS EN EMPRESAS DE LA COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA

Tesis por compendio[EN] One of the greatest challenges of companies from its beginnings has been to improve productivity through efficiency in all processes, especially in production processes. To do this, has used different tools, being the study of working methods and standard times a powerful tool for improving productivity in companies, especially measuring and improving the productivity from the human viewpoint factor. The literature review to contextualize this thesis shows that there is a lot of literature on the definition of productivity, the evolution of the term over time, factors affecting it, different ways of measuring, different ratings for definitions productivity, etc. A significant search and a profound classification has been made refuting some statements. Initially this thesis is focused on identifying the situation of different sectors of Valencia in productivity, techniques and tools used to measure it, two sectors - automotive and lighting companies - have been thoroughly studied conducting surveys to companies in both sectors. Both qualitative and quantitative results as shown. Interesting findings are extracted from this study, such as, among others, that different sectors have diferent needs, different tools are used depending on the sector or the same tools are used for different purposes. This studies has been supported by a thorough review of the supplement tables provided by the International Labour Organization, which has been undertaken by the author supported by the work of experts in this field. To reinforce this last point, interviews to experts timekeepers has been made to see the deficiencies found in time studies conducted in companies and what are the causes.[ES] Uno de los mayores retos de las empresas desde sus inicios ha sido mejorar la productividad a través de la eficiencia en todos sus procesos, especialmente en los procesos productivos. Para ello, han utilizado distintos métodologías, siendo el estudio de métodos y tiempos una poderosa herramienta para la mejora de la productividad en las empresas, sobre todo la medición y la mejora de la productividad desde el punto de vista del factor humano. La revisión bibliográfica realizada para contextualizar la presente tesis muestra que existe una extensa literatura sobre la definición de productividad, la evolución del término con el tiempo, factores que inciden en la misma, distintas formas de medirla, distintas clasificaciones de las definiciones de productividad, etc. Se ha realizado una importante búsqueda y una profunda clasificación de la misma y se ha refutado alguna afirmación al respecto. Inicialmente la presente tesis se centra en identificar la situación de diferentes sectores de la Comunidad Valenciana en cuanto a productividad, métodos, técnicas y herramientas utilizadas para medir la misma, para lo cual se ha realizado un profundo estudio en dos sectores: luminarias y automoción. Para ello se ha realizado encuestas a empresas de ambos sectores. Se muestran los resultados tanto cualitativos como cuantitativos. De dicho estudio se extraen conclusiones interesantes, cómo son, entre otras: que distintos sectores tienen distintas necesidades, se utilizan distintas herramientas dependiendo del sector o que las mismas herramientas se utilizan para diferentes finalidades. También se ha querido apoyar estos estudios con una profunda revisión de las tablas de suplementos de descanso de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, tarea que ha sido realizado por la autora de la presente tesis apoyándose en el trabajo de expertos en la materia. Para reforzar este último punto se han realizado entrevistas a cronometradores expertos, para ver las deficiencias encontradas en los estudios realizados en las empresas y cuáles son las causas.[CA] Un dels majors reptes de les empreses des dels seus inicis ha sigut millorar la productivitat a través de l'eficiència en tots els seus processos, especialment en els processos productius. Per a això, ha utilitzat distintes metodologies, sent l'estudi de mètodes i temps una poderosa ferramenta per a la millora de la productivitat en les empreses, sobretot el mesurament i la millora de la productivitat des del punt de vista del factor humà. La revisió bibliogràfica realitzada per a contextualitzar la present tesi mostra que hi ha una extensa literatura sobre la definició de productivitat, l'evolució del terme amb el temps, factors que incidixen en la mateixa, distintes formes de mesurar-la, distintes classificacions, etc. S'ha realitzat una important recerca i una profunda classificació de la mateixa i s'ha refutat alguna afirmació al respecte. Inicialment la present tesi se centra a identificar la situació de diferents sectors de la Comunitat Valenciana quant a productivitat, tècniques i ferramentes utilitzades per a mesurar la mateixa, per a la qual cosa s'ha realiztat un profund estudi en dos sectors: lluminàries i automoció. Per a això s'ha realitzat enquestes a empreses d'ambdós sectors. Es mostren els resultats tan qualitatius com quantitatius. Del dit estudi s'extrauen conclusions interessants, com són, entre altres: que distints sectors tenen distintes necessitats, s'utilitzen distintes ferramentes depenent del sector o que les mateixes ferramentes s'utilitzen per a diferents finalitats. També s'ha volgut recolzar estos estudis amb una profunda revisió de les taules de suplements de descans de l'Organització Internacional del Treball, treball que ha sigut realitzada per l'autora de la present tesi recolzant-se en el treball d'experts en la matèria. Per a reforçar este últim punt s'han realitzat entrevistes a cronometradors experts, per a veure les deficiències trobades en els estudis realitzats en les empreses i quines són les causes.Estelles Miguel, S. (2015). LA PRODUCTIVIDAD EN LA DÉCADA DEL 2010: CARACTERIZACIÓN Y PROPUESTAS DE MEJORA EN LAS TÉCNICAS DE ESTUDIO DE MÉTODOS Y TIEMPOS EN EMPRESAS DE LA COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/59422Compendi

Multivariable Supplier Segmentation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management

[EN] Pressure from stakeholders for sustainable development is forcing top management to reconsider its supply chain management. This form of sustainability must consider the risks, insecurities, and lack of proximity caused by any event on the global economy. Organizations must identify and manage the risks of every link in the chain, while pursuing sustainable development. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development must be the result of a deliberate and coordinated response by the entire organization. A suitable segmentation of suppliers allows development strategies to be prioritized. This article presents the steps that should be followed in supply chain management, the identification of risks, and the new leadership of purchasing management to develop a sustainable supply chain. To this end, some of the key industrial actions reported in the literature are outlined, and two case studies are presented to identify the steps for the segmentation and dynamic development of suppliers. This article provides reflections on the responsibilities of senior management in the new era of sustainable development and presents guidance on how to coordinate sustainable development in the supply chain.Rius-Sorolla, G.; Estelles Miguel, S.; Rueda Armengot, C. (2020). Multivariable Supplier Segmentation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustainability. 12(11):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114556S1161211rabieh, masood, babaee, leila, Fadaei Rafsanjani, abbASS, & Esmaeili, M. (2018). Sustainable Supplier Selection and Order Allocation: An Integrated Delphi Method, Fuzzy TOPSIS and Multi-Objective Programming Model. Scientia Iranica, 0(0), 0-0. doi:10.24200/sci.2018.5254.1176Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474-1486. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based «View» a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011938Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). CROSSROADS—Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263-1273. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0564Teece, D. J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0116Gold, S., Seuring, S., & Beske, P. (2009). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/csr.207Walker, H., & Jones, N. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management across the UK private sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 15-28. doi:10.1108/13598541211212177Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303Xia, Y. (2011). Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(2), 194-203. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.028Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020Bai, C., Rezaei, J., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Multicriteria Green Supplier Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(4), 515-528. doi:10.1109/tem.2017.2723639Akhavan, R. M., & Beckmann, M. (2017). A configuration of sustainable sourcing and supply management strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), 137-151. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2016.07.006UNCSD Industry and Sustainable Development—6th Sessionhttp://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/CN.17/1998/4&Lang=EVivas, R., Sant’anna, Â., Esquerre, K., & Freires, F. (2019). Measuring Sustainability Performance with Multi Criteria Model: A Case Study. Sustainability, 11(21), 6113. doi:10.3390/su11216113AENOR Certificación ISO 14001 sistemas de gestión ambientalhttps://www.aenor.com/certificacion/medio-ambiente/gestion-ambientalAENOR Certificación SA 8000https://www.aenor.com/certificacion/responsabilidad-social/sa-8000-empresa-saludableMerli, R., Preziosi, M., & Massa, I. (2015). Social Values and Sustainability: A Survey on Drivers, Barriers and Benefits of SA8000 Certification in Italian Firms. Sustainability, 7(4), 4120-4130. doi:10.3390/su7044120PAGELL, M., WU, Z., & WASSERMAN, M. E. (2010). THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT PURCHASING PORTFOLIOS: AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE SOURCING. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57-73. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03186.xCarter, C. R., & Liane Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46-62. doi:10.1108/09600031111101420A Strategic Role for Purchasinghttps://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA11739695&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00475394&p=AONE&sw=wDYER, J. H. (1996). SPECIALIZED SUPPLIER NETWORKS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE AUTO INDUSTRY. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271-291. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199604)17:43.0.co;2-yChen, I. J., Paulraj, A., & Lado, A. A. (2004). Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 505-523. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002Dubois, A., & Pedersen, A.-C. (2002). Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models—a comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), 35-42. doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(01)00014-4Rezaei, J., & Fallah Lajimi, H. (2018). Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier potential matrix. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(4), 419-436. doi:10.1080/13675567.2018.1535649Day, M., Magnan, G. M., & Moeller, M. M. (2010). Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: A review and taxonomy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 625-639. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.06.001Svensson, G. (2004). Supplier segmentation in the automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(1), 12-38. doi:10.1108/09600030410515664Parasuraman, A. (1980). Vendor segmentation: An additional level of market segmentation. Industrial Marketing Management, 9(1), 59-62. doi:10.1016/0019-8501(80)90035-8Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk M anagement. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 15-27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2003.tb00156.xLee, D. M., & Drake, P. R. (2009). A portfolio model for component purchasing strategy and the case study of two South Korean elevator manufacturers. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6651-6682. doi:10.1080/00207540902897780Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2012). A multi-variable approach to supplier segmentation. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4593-4611. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.615352Gelderman, C. J., & van Weele, A. J. (2005). Purchasing Portfolio Models: A Critique and Update. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(3), 19-28. doi:10.1111/j.1055-6001.2005.04103003.xOlsen, R. F., & Ellram, L. M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 101-113. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(96)00089-2Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152-9164. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073Ellram, L. M., & Pearson, J. N. (1993). The Role of the Purchasing Function: Toward Team Participation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(2), 2-9. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.1993.tb00007.xGiunipero, L. C., & Vogt, J. F. (1997). Empowering the Purchasing Function: Moving to Team Decisions. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(4), 8-15. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.1997.tb00020.xJohnson, P. F., Klassen, R. D., Leenders, M. R., & Fearon, H. E. (2002). Determinants of purchasing team usage in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 77-89. doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00078-xKitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009Rius-Sorolla, G., Maheut, J., Estelles-Miguel, S., & Garcia-Sabater, J. P. (2017). Protocol: Systematic Literature Review on coordination mechanisms for the mathematical programming models in production planning with decentralized decision making. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 8(2), 22. doi:10.4995/wpom.v8i2.7858Rius-Sorolla, G., Maheut, J., Estellés-Miguel, S., & Garcia-Sabater, J. P. (2018). Coordination mechanisms with mathematical programming models for decentralized decision-making: a literature review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(1), 61-104. doi:10.1007/s10100-018-0594-zCooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply Chain Management: More Than a New Name for Logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 1-14. doi:10.1108/09574099710805556Colla, E., & Dupuis, M. (2002). Research and managerial issues on global retail competition: Carrefour/Wal‐Mart. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 30(2), 103-111. doi:10.1108/09590550210418128Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Cgu, W. (1998). Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next «Best Practice» in Supply Chain Management. California Management Review, 40(2), 57-77. doi:10.2307/41165933Bloom, P. N., & Perry, V. G. (2001). Retailer power and supplier welfare. Journal of Retailing, 77(3), 379-396. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00048-3Muller, H. E. (2009). Supplier integration: an international comparison of supplier and automaker experiences. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 9(1), 18. doi:10.1504/ijatm.2009.023584Dyer, J., & Chu, W. (2010). The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relations in the US, Japan, and Korea: A retrospective. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 28-34. doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.48Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259-285. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490905Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.57.12806GM Ranked Worst Automaker by U.S. Suppliers: Survey Reutershttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-gm-suppliers-survey/gm-ranked-worst-automaker-by-u-s-suppliers-survey-idUSBREA4B01I20140512Ritchie, P. (1990). McDonald′s: A Winner through Logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 20(3), 21-24. doi:10.1108/eum0000000000356McDonald’s Our Historyhttps://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en-us/about-us/our-history.htmlXing, Liu, Wang, Shen, & Zhu. (2019). Environmental Regulation, Environmental Commitment, Sustainability Exploration/Exploitation Innovation, and Firm Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 11(21), 6001. doi:10.3390/su11216001Deloitte Global Powers of Retailing 2018https://www2.deloitte.com/ni/es/pages/consumer-business/articles/global-powers-of-retailing-2018.htmlMercadonahttps://ssrn.com/abstract=1607757Balance Gran Consumo 2016https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/es/Noticias/El-Gran-Consumo-cae-en-2016#downloadThankyouCallejo, M. B.-, & Heredero, C. de P.-. (2019). Co-innovation at Mercadona: a radically different and unique innovation model in the retail sector. Journal of Business & Retail Management Research, 13(04). doi:10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-30Calabrese, A., & Scoglio, F. (2012). Reframing the past: A new approach in service quality assessment. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11-12), 1329-1343. doi:10.1080/14783363.2012.733259Mercadé-Melé, P., Molinillo-Jiménez, S., & Fernández-Moralesa, A. (2014). Influencia de las prácticas de responsabilidad social corporativa en la actitud del consumidor: análisis comparado de Mercadona, Carrefour y Eroski. European Journal Of Family Business, 4(1). doi:10.24310/ejfbejfb.v4i1.5040Siro acelera su desconexión de Mercadona con la venta de la planta de Navarréshttps://www.levante-emv.com/economia/2019/11/06/siro-acelera-desconexion-mercadona-venta/1941206.html?utm_medium=rssHarris, L. C., O’Malley, L., & Patterson, M. (2003). Professional Interaction: Exploring the Concept of Attraction. Marketing Theory, 3(1), 9-36. doi:10.1177/1470593103003001002Vitasek, K., & Manrodt, K. (2012). Vested outsourcing: a flexible framework for collaborative outsourcing. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5(1), 4-14. doi:10.1108/17538291211221924Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V., & Calantone, R. J. (2000). A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms’ Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance. Decision Sciences, 31(1), 33-55. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00923.xZimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2015). Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412-1442. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340Wynstra, F., & Pierick, E. ten. (2000). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a portfolio approach. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 49-57. doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(99)00035-0Mercadona-Conservas Ubago: The Intersupplier Concepthttps://www.santelmo.org/mercadona-conservas-ubago-the-intersupplier-concept/4971Swinney, R., & Netessine, S. (2009). Long-Term Contracts Under the Threat of Supplier Default. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(1), 109-127. doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0199Zhu, W., & Wang, Z. (2018). The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 10(5), 1510. doi:10.3390/su10051510Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota׳s coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 217-227. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.010PAGELL, M., & WU, Z. (2009). BUILDING A MORE COMPLETE THEORY OF SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT USING CASE STUDIES OF 10 EXEMPLARS. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37-56. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03162.xStuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 419-433. doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00022-0Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385MAThread MAThreadhttps://mathread.com/Sabater, J. J. G., & Garcia, J. A. M. (2011). Can we still talk about continuous improvement? Rethinking enablers and inhibitors for successful implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(1/2), 28. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2011.041678Paipa-Galeano, L., Bernal-Torres, C. A., Agudelo Otálora, L. M., Jarrah Nezhad, Y., & González-Blanco, H. A. (2020). Key lessons to maintain continuous improvement: A case study of four companies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(1), 195. doi:10.3926/jiem.297

The effect of managing different types of work on open innovation: A micro-organizational perspective

[EN] Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the different types of work and to examine how they are related with open innovation, either by carrying out relationships with companies or external agents, or through the outsourcing of qualified and creative work. Design/methodology/approach After the theoretical analysis of the different types of work, the empirical study uses qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyze the different variables and their relations which favor open innovation. Findings The combination of the variables in the QCA makes it possible to obtain three paths among the characteristics of the qualified work and open innovation, with a positive empirical result. The general conclusion is that the motivation level of the qualified work is relevant for open innovation. Originality/value The originality and value of this paper consist in relating the internal efficiency in the work management with the effectiveness and success of open innovation.Peris-Ortiz, M.; Rueda Armengot, C.; Estelles Miguel, S. (2020). The effect of managing different types of work on open innovation: A micro-organizational perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 33(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2018-0264S115331Andersen, T. J. (2000). Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. Long Range Planning, 33(2), 184-200. doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(00)00028-5Andersen, T. J. (2004). Integrating the Strategy Formation Process: European Management Journal, 22(3), 263-272. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.008Andersen, T. J. (2004). Integrating Decentralized Strategy Making and Strategic Planning Processes in Dynamic Environments. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1271-1299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00475.xBecker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898-925. doi:10.1177/0149206306293668Brettel, M., Heinemann, F., Engelen, A., & Neubauer, S. (2011). Cross-Functional Integration of R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing in Radical and Incremental Product Innovations and Its Effects on Project Effectiveness and Efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 251-269. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00795.xBrews, P. J., & Hunt, M. R. (1999). Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 889-913. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199910)20:103.0.co;2-fCarroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2015). Service capabilities within open innovation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(2), 275-303. doi:10.1108/jeim-10-2013-0078Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2014). When Is Open Innovation Beneficial? The Role of Strategic Orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1235-1253. doi:10.1111/jpim.12148Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354-363. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930-938. doi:10.1111/jpim.12471Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds) (2008), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi:10.2307/2393553Donate, M. J., Peña, I., & Sánchez de Pablo, J. D. (2015). HRM practices for human and social capital development: effects on innovation capabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(9), 928-953. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1047393Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). CROSSROADS—Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263-1273. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0564Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. doi:10.1086/467037Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1985). Organizational forms and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 101-119. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(85)90045-5Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914-925. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006Galbraith, J.R. (2014), “Designing organizations: strategy”, Structure and Process at de Business Units and Enterprise Levels, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Hart, S. L. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327-351. doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279547Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2014). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850. doi:10.1002/smj.2247Van Hoorn, A. (2016). How much does job autonomy vary across countries and other extra-organizational contexts? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 420-463. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1192052Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1992), “Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure”, in Werin, L. and Wijkander, H. (Eds), Contract Economics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43(5), 853-866. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257-272. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060306Moreno-Luzón, M.D., Peris, F.J. and González, T. (2001), “Gestión de la Calidad y Diseño de Organizaciones”, Teoría y Estudio de Casos, Prentice Hall, Madrid.Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000), “SEC1, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation”, in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D.J. (Eds), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, SAGE, London, pp. 145-169.Peris-Ortiz, M., Rueda-Armengot, C., & Pechuán, I. G. (2012). Job Classification for the Purpose of Making Optimal Decisions Concerning Management Control. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 29(3), 231-241. doi:10.1002/cjas.1223Perrow, C. (1967). A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194. doi:10.2307/2091811Raffiee, J., & Coff, R. (2016). Micro-Foundations of Firm-Specific Human Capital: When Do Employees Perceive Their Skills to be Firm-Specific? Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 766-790. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0286Ragin, C.C. and Fiss, P. (2008), “Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstration”, in Ragin, C.C. (Ed.), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 190-212.Rangus, K., & Slavec, A. (2017). The interplay of decentralization, employee involvement and absorptive capacity on firms’ innovation and business performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.017Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2009). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246-266. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.36Spender, J.-C. (2008). Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither? Management Learning, 39(2), 159-176. doi:10.1177/1350507607087582Teece, D. J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0116Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.co;2-zWeick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357. doi:10.2307/2393372Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805-811. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001Williamson, O. E. (2002). The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 171-195. doi:10.1257/089533002760278776Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021Hossain, M., Islam, K. M. Z., Sayeed, M. A., & Kauranen, I. (2016). A comprehensive review of open innovation literature. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 7(1), 2-25. doi:10.1108/jstpm-02-2015-000

II Simposium Predoctoral de Organización de Empresas

En este libro se recogen las publicaciones de investigación presentadas durante el II Simposium Predoctoral del Departamento de Organización de Empresas. El objetivo principal del mismo era crear una red de estudiantes de doctorado e investigadores predoctorales del Departamento de Organización de Empresas para permitir el intercambio de conocimientos y prácticas.Ribes-Giner, G.; Estelles-Miguel, S. (2023). II Simposium Predoctoral de Organización de Empresas. Universitat Politècnica de València. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/19666

Collaborative learning and pandemic situation with online teaching. The experience in Management Skills for Engineers

[EN] In the subject of Management Skills for Engineers in the last 2020/21 academic year, it was necessary to modify radically the full teaching scheme. Given that the number of students was small and that they already knew the conceptual management basis, this subject had traditionally been developed through reverse teaching and carrying out cases and group works in a collaborative learning context. COVID and the need of structuring teaching and tutorials based on TEAMS, which the UPV has standardized, raised an important turning point and decision: moving to a traditional teaching methodology or keeping the one used until now adapting it to take advantage of the potential of TEAMS and the rest of the UPV's applications. In this communication the theoretical foundations, the planning of the subject and the most significant results are summarized.Dema Pérez, CM.; Estelles Miguel, S.; Fernández Llatas, C. (2022). Collaborative learning and pandemic situation with online teaching. The experience in Management Skills for Engineers. En Proceedings INNODOCT/21. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. 197-205. https://doi.org/10.4995/INN2021.2021.13936OCS19720

Morphologic matrix application as a tool to spring on creativity

[EN] Morphological analysis methodology has a broad spectrum of application: from technological management to the design of new products and services. Among the techniques applied for spurring creativity in “Managerial Skills to Engineers”, Morphological Analysis has been that has had more success along the years. Traditionally has the feature of being a technique very structured that easily can be applied by the students for resolving different kind of problems, and actually the results confirm this asseveration. Our group has applied this methodology since many years ago. First on doctorate courses of “Technology Management” and afterwards on training in different companies, degree and master subjects, and on Continuous Improvement actions (Kaizen blitz) in Almusaffes Ford Factory and first line suppliers. On this paper we discuss the experience applying it as a tool for developing new products combining with other techniques for spurring creativity as brain storming, lateral thinking, de Bono’s hats, nominal group, etc. In this communication are resumed some of the technique application results and the most interesting answers to the final questionnaire each year is passed for knowing directly student’s real opinion.Dema Pérez, CM.; Estelles Miguel, S.; Fernández Llatas, C. (2022). Morphologic matrix application as a tool to spring on creativity. En Proceedings INNODOCT/21. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.4995/INN2021.2021.1393720721

Consideraciones para el aprendizaje autónomo en el entorno asíncrono: caso de implementación gradual de aula invertida en ingeniería

[ES] El presente artículo aborda la implementación gradual en educación superior del modelo de aula invertida para el caso de estudiantes de primer semestre de ingeniería. La transición de clase tradicional hacia aula invertida inició en el entorno síncrono, dentro del aula, con la integración del aprendizaje activo basado en problemas, reportando resultados favorables. Sin embargo, los resultados muestran una disminución en el rendimiento relacionado con un mayor uso de TIC en el entorno asíncrono. En consecuencia, para lograr el aprendizaje autónomo, se propone considerar en la etapa de diseño del aula invertida, el estilo de aprendizaje, la disponibilidad de recursos tecnológicos y las competencias digitales de los estudiantesCortes Aguilar, TA.; Estelles Miguel, S. (2019). Consideraciones para el aprendizaje autónomo en el entorno asíncrono: caso de implementación gradual de aula invertida en ingeniería. En INNODOCT/18. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. 367-377. https://doi.org/10.4995/INN2018.2018.8778OCS36737

Coordination mechanisms with mathematical programming models for decentralized decision-making, a literature review

[EN] The increase in the complexity of supply chains requires greater efforts to align the activities of all its members in order to improve the creation of value of their products or services offered to customers. In general, the information is asymmetric; each member has its own objective and limitations that may be in conflict with other members. Operations managements face the challenge of coordinating activities in such a way that the supply chain as a whole remains competitive, while each member improves by cooperating. This document aims to offer a systematic review of the collaborative planning in the last decade on the mechanisms of coordination in mathematical programming models that allow us to position existing concepts and identify areas where more research is needed.Rius-Sorolla, G.; Maheut, J.; Estelles Miguel, S.; García Sabater, JP. (2020). Coordination mechanisms with mathematical programming models for decentralized decision-making, a literature review. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 28(1):61-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0594-zS61104281Acar Y, Atadeniz SN (2015) Comparison of integrated and local planning approaches for the supply network of a globally-dispersed enterprise. Int J Prod Econ 167:204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.028Agnetis A, Hall NG, Pacciarelli D (2006) Supply chain scheduling: sequence coordination. Discrete Appl Math 154(15):2044–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2005.04.019Agnetis A, Aloulou MA, Fu LL (2016) Production and interplant batch delivery scheduling: Dominance and cooperation. Int J Prod Econ 182:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.007Albrecht M (2010) Supply chain coordination mechanisms Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 628. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02833-5Albrecht M, Stadtler H (2015) Coordinating decentralized linear programs by exchange of primal information. Eur J Oper Res 247(3):788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.045Arkan A, Hejazi SR (2012) Coordinating orders in a two echelon supply chain with controllable lead time and ordering cost using the credit period. Comput Ind Eng 62(1):56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.08.016Arshinder, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG (2008) Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 115(2):316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.011Attanasio A, Ghiani G, Grandinetti L, Guerriero F (2006) Auction algorithms for decentralized parallel machine scheduling. Parallel Comput 32(9):701–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2006.03.002Badole CM, Jain R, Rathore APS, Nepal B (2012) Research and opportunities in supply chain modeling: a review. Int J Supply Chain Manag 1(3):63–86Bajgiran OS, Zanjani MK, Nourelfath M (2016) The value of integrated tactical planning optimization in the lumber supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 171:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.021Behnamian J (2014) Multi-cut Benders decomposition approach to collaborative scheduling. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(11):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.961963Ben-Daya M, Darwish M, Ertogral K (2008) The joint economic lot sizing problem: review and extensions. Eur J Oper Res 185(2):726–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.026Benders JF (1962) Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numer Math 4(1):238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386316Bhatnagar R, Chandra P, Goyal SK (1993) Models for multi-plant coordination. Eur J Oper Res 67(2):141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90058-UBuer T, Homberger JJ, Gehring H (2013) A collaborative ant colony metaheuristic for distributed multi-level uncapacitated lot-sizing. Int J Prod Res 51(17):5253–5270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.802822Buer T, Ziebuhr M, Kopfer H (2015) A coordination mechanism for a collaborative lot-sizing problem with rivaling agents. In: Mattfeld D, Spengler T, Brinkmann J, Grunewald M (eds) Logistics management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13177-1_26Buxmann P, Ahsen A Von, Díaz LM (2008) Economic evaluation of cooperation scenarios in supply chains. J Enterp Inf Manag 21(3):247–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390810866628Chakraborty A, Chatterjee AK (2015) A surcharge pricing scheme for supply chain coordination under JIT environment. Eur J Oper Res 253(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.001Chen IJ, Paulraj A, Lado AA (2004) Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. J Oper Manag 22(5):505–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002Cheng JH (2011) Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains. Int J Inf Manag 31(4):374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.09.004Cheng R, Forbes JF, San Yip W, Fraser Forbes J, Yip WS (2008) Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition and plant-wide MPC coordination. Comput Chem Eng 32(7):1507–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.07.003Cooper MC, Lambert DM, Pagh JD (1997) Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. Int J Logist Manag 8(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099710805556Dantzig GB, Wolfe P (1960) Decomposition principle for linear programs. Oper Res 8(1):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.8.1.101Dash RK, Vytelingum P, Rogers A, David E, Jennings NR (2007) Market-based task allocation mechanisms for limited-capacity suppliers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 37(3):391–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2007.893474Dudek G, Stadtler H (2005) Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners. Eur J Operat Res 163(3):668–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.014Dudek G, Stadtler H (2007) Negotiation-based collaborative planning in divergent two-tier supply chains. Int J Prod Res 45(2):465–484Ertogral K, David Wu S (2000) Auction-theoretic coordination of production planning in the supply chain. IIE Trans 32:931–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170008967451Eslikizi S, Ziebuhr M, Kopfer H, Buer T (2015) Shapley-based side payments and simulated annealing for distributed lot-sizing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3):1592–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.313Fan M, Stallaert J, Whinston AB (2003) Decentralized mechanism design for supply chain organizations using an auction market. Inf Syst Res 14(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.1.14763Feng Y, D’Amours S, Beauregard R (2008) The value of sales and operations planning in oriented strand board industry with make-to-order manufacturing system: cross functional integration under deterministic demand and spot market recourse. Int J Prod Econ 115(1):189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.06.002Fisher ML (1985) An applications oriented guide to Lagrangian relaxation. Interfaces 15(2):10–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.15.2.10Fisher ML (2004) The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Manag Sci 50(12 Supplement):1861–1871. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0263Frazzon E, Makuschewits T, Scholz-Reiter B, Novaes AGN (2010) Assessing the integrated scheduling of manufacturing and transportation systems along global supply chains. In: World conference on transport research, LisbonGaudreault J, Forget P, Frayret JMJ, Rousseau A, Lemieux S, D’Amours S (2010) Distributed operations planning in the softwood lumber supply chain: models and coordination. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 17(3):168–189Gunnerud V, Foss B (2010) Oil production optimization—a piecewise linear model, solved with two decomposition strategies. Comput Chem Eng 34(11):1803–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.10.019Harb H, Paprott JN, Matthes P, Schütz T, Streblow R, Mueller D (2015) Decentralized scheduling strategy of heating systems for balancing the residual load. Build Environ 86:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.015Held M, Karp RM (1970) The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning trees. Oper Res 18(6):1138–1162. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.18.6.1138Held M, Karp RM (1971) The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning trees: part II. Math Program 1(1):6–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584070Homberger J (2010) Decentralized multi-level uncapacitated lot-sizing by automated negotiation. 4OR 8(2):155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-009-0104-1Homberger J (2011) A generic coordination mechanism for lot-sizing in supply chains. Electron Commer Res 11(2):123–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9053-1Homberger J, Gehring H (2010) A pheromone-based negotiation mechanism for lot-sizing in supply chains. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.26Homberger J, Gehring H (2011) An ant colony optimization-based negotiation approach for lot-sizing in supply chains. Int J Inf Process Manag 2(3):86–99. https://doi.org/10.4156/ijipm.vol2.issue3.10Homberger J, Gehring H, Buer T (2015) Integrating side payments into collaborative planning for the distributed multi-level unconstrained lot sizing problem. In: Bui TX, Sprague RH (eds) 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 2015. IEEE, pp 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2015.131Huang GQ, Lau JSK, Mak KL (2003) The impacts of sharing production information on supply chain dynamics: a review of the literature. Int J Prod Res 41(7):1483–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000069625Jeong I-J (2012) A centralized/decentralized design of a full return contract for a risk-free manufacturer and a risk-neutral retailer under partial information sharing. Int J Prod Econ 136(1):110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.019Jeong IJ, Leon VJ (2002) Decision-making and cooperative interaction via coupling agents in organizationally distributed systems. IIE Trans (Inst Ind Eng) 34(9):789–802. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015548705266Jeong IJ, Yim SB (2009) A job shop distributed scheduling based on Lagrangian relaxation to minimise total completion time. Int J Prod Res 47(24):6783–6805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701824217Jia ZZ, Deschamps JC, Dupas R (2016) A negotiation protocol to improve planning coordination in transport-driven supply chains. J Manuf Syst 38:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.10.003Jung H, Chen FF, Jeong B (2008) Decentralized supply chain planning framework for third party logistics partnership. Comput Ind Eng 55(2):348–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.017Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: a laboratory study. J Oper Manag 31(3):129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.01.001Kelly JD, Zyngier D (2008) Hierarchical decomposition heuristic for scheduling: coordinated reasoning for decentralized and distributed decision-making problems. Comput Chem Eng 32(11):2684–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.08.007Kong J, Rönnqvist M (2014) Coordination between strategic forest management and tactical logistic and production planning in the forestry supply chain. Int Trans Oper Res 21(5):703–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12089Kovács A, Egri P, Kis T, Váncza J (2013) Inventory control in supply chains: alternative approaches to a two-stage lot-sizing problem. Int J Prod Econ 143(2):385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.001Kumar BK, Nagaraju D, Narayanan S (2016) Supply chain coordination models: a literature review. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/86938Kutanoglu E, David Wu S (1999) On combinatorial auction and Lagrangean relaxation for distributed resource scheduling. IIE Trans 31(9):813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179908969883Lau HC, Zhao ZJ, Ge SS, Lee TH (2011) Allocating resources in multiagent flowshops with adaptive auctions. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 8(4):732–743. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2011.2160536Lee DJ, Jeong IJ (2010) A distributed coordination for a single warehouse-multiple retailer problem under private information. Int J Prod Econ 125(1):190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.001Lehoux N, D’Amours S, Frein Y, Langevin A, Penz B (2010a) Collaboration for a two-echelon supply chain in the pulp and paper industry: the use of incentives to increase profit. J Oper Res Soc 62(4):581–592. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.167Lehoux N, D’Amours S, Langevin A (2010b) A win–win collaboration approach for a two-echelon supply chain: a case study in the pulp and paper industry. Eur J Ind Eng 4(4):493. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2010.035656Lehoux N, D’Amours S, Langevin A (2014) Inter-firm collaborations and supply chain coordination: review of key elements and case study. Prod Plan Control 25(10):858–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.771413Li X, Wang Q (2007) Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. Eur J Oper Res 179(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.023Lu SYP, Lau HYK, Yiu CKF (2012) A hybrid solution to collaborative decision-making in a decentralized supply-chain. J Eng Technol Manag 29(1):95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.09.008Mahdiraji HA, Zavadskas EK, Hajiagha SHR (2015) Game theoretic approach for coordinating unlimited multi echelon supply chains. Transform Bus Econ 14(2):133–151Maheut J, Besga JM, Uribetxebarria J, Garcia-Sabater JP (2014a) A decision support system for modelling and implementing the supply network configuration and operations scheduling problem in the machine tool industry. Prod Plan Control 25(8):679–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.798087Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JP, Garcia-Sabater JJ, Marin-Garcia J (2014b) Coordination mechanism for MILP models to plan operations within an advanced planning and scheduling system in a motor company: a case study. In: Prado-Prado JC, García-Arca J (eds) Annals of industrial engineering 2012. Springer, London, pp 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5349-8_29Manrodt KB, Vitasek K (2004) Global process standardization: a case study. J Bus Logist 25(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00168.xMarin-Garcia JA, Ramirez Bayarri L, Atares Huerta L (2015) Protocol: comparing advantages and disadvantages of rating scales, behavior observation scales and paired comparison scales for behavior assessment of competencies in workers. A systematic literature review. Work Pap Oper Manag 6(2):49. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4032Mason AN, Villalobos JR (2015) Coordination of perishable crop production using auction mechanisms. Agric Syst 138:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.008McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. J Econ Lit 25(2):699–738Medina-Lopez C, Marin-Garcia JA, Alfalla-Luque R (2010) Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). Work Pap Oper Manag. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786Mouret S, Grossmann IE, Pestiaux P (2011) A new Lagrangian decomposition approach applied to the integration of refinery planning and crude-oil scheduling. Comput Chem Eng 35(12):2750–2766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.026Mula J, Peidro D, Díaz-Madroñero M, Vicens E (2010) Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning. Eur J Oper Res 204(3):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.008Nie L, Xu X, Zhan D (2008) Collaborative planning in supply chains by lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 7(1):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622008002879Nishi T, Shinozaki R, Konishi M (2008) An augmented Lagrangian approach for distributed supply chain planning for multiple companies. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 5(2):259–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2007.894727Ouelhadj D, Petrovic S (2009) A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems. J Sched 12(4):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-008-0090-8Pibernik R, Sucky E (2007) An approach to inter-domain master planning in supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 108(1–2):200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.010Pittman SD, Bare BB, Briggs DG (2007) Hierarchical production planning in forestry using price-directed decomposition. Can J For 37(10):2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-026Polyak BT (1969) Minimization of unsmooth functionals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 9(3):14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(69)90061-5Pukkala T, Heinonen T, Kurttila M (2009) An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning. For Sci 55(1):13–22Qu T, Nie DX, Chen X, Chen XD, Dai QY, Huang GQ (2015) Optimal configuration of cluster supply chains with augmented Lagrange coordination. Comput Ind Eng 84(SI):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.026Reiss F, Buer T (2014) A coordination mechanism for capacitated lot-sizing in non-hierarchical n-tier supply chains. In: 2014 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in production and logistics systems (Cipls), pp 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/cipls.2014.7007155Rius-Sorolla G, Maheut J, Estelles-Miguel S, Garcia-Sabater JP (2017) Protocol: systematic literature review on coordination mechanisms for the mathematical programming models in production planning with decentralized decision making. Work Pap Oper Manag 8(2):22. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i2.7858Sahin F, Robinson EPP (2002) Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: review, implications, and directions for future research. Decis Sci 33(4):505–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.xSilva CA, Sousa JMC, Runkler TA, Sá da Costa J (2009) Distributed supply chain management using ant colony optimization. Eur J Oper Res 199(2):349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.021Simatupang T, Sridharan R (2006) The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510577421Singh G, Ernst A (2011) Resource constraint scheduling with a fractional shared resource. Oper Res Lett 39(5):363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2011.06.003Singh G, O’Keefe CM (2016) Decentralised scheduling with confidentiality protection. Oper Res Lett 44(4):514–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2016.05.004Sokoler LE, Standardi L, Edlund K, Poulsen NK, Madsen H, Jørgensen JB (2014) A Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition algorithm for linear economic model predictive control of dynamically decoupled subsystems. J Process Control 24(8):1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.05.013Sridharan R, Simatupang TM (2009) Managerial views of supply chain collaboration. Gadjah Mada Int J Bus 11(2):253–273Stadtler H (2007) A framework for collaborative planning and state-of-the-art. OR Spectr 31(1):5–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-007-0104-5Stadtler H, Kilger C (2008) Supply chain management and advanced planning. In: Stadtler H, Kilger C (eds) Supply chain management and advanced planning. Concepts, models, software, and case studies. Springer, BerlinStank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK (1999) Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast food industry. J Oper Manag 17(4):429–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00052-7Taghipour A, Frayret JM (2013) An algorithm to improve operations planning in decentralized supply chains. In: 2013 international conference on advanced logistics and transport, ICALT 2013, pp 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/icadlt.2013.6568442Tang SH, Rahimi I, Karimi H (2016a) Objectives, products and demand requirements in integrated supply chain network design: a review. Int J Ind Syst Eng 23(2):181. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2016.076399Tang J, Zeng C, Pan Z (2016b) Auction-based cooperation mechanism to parts scheduling for flexible job shop with inter-cells. Appl Soft Comput 49:590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.046Thomas A, Singh G, Krishnamoorthy M, Venkateswaran J (2013) Distributed optimisation method for multi-resource constrained scheduling in coal supply chains. Int J Prod Res 51(9):2740–2759. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.737955Thomas A, Venkateswaran J, Singh G, Krishnamoorthy M (2014) A resource constrained scheduling problem with multiple independent producers and a single linking constraint: a coal supply chain example. Eur J Oper Res 236(3):946–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.006Thomas A, Krishnamoorthy M, Singh G, Venkateswaran J (2015) Coordination in a multiple producers–distributor supply chain and the value of information. Int J Prod Econ 167:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.020VICS (2004) Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from https://www.gs1us.org/Vitasek K (2016) Strategic sourcing business models. Strateg Outsour Int J 9(2):126–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-02-2016-0003Walther G, Schmid E, Spengler TS (2008) Negotiation-based coordination in product recovery networks. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):334–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.069Wang L, Pfohl HC, Berbner U, Keck AK (2016) Supply chain collaboration or conflict? Information sharing and supply chain performance in the automotive industry. In: Clausen U, Friedrich H, Thaller C, Geiger C (eds) Commercial transport. Springer, Cham, pp 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21266-1Wenzel S, Paulen R, Krämer S, Beisheim B, Engell S (2016a) Shared resource allocation in an integrated petrochemical site by price-based coordination using quadratic approximation. In: 2016 European control conference, ECC 2016, pp 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1109/ecc.2016.7810427Wenzel S, Paulen R, Stojanovski G, Kraemer S, Beisheim B, Engell S (2016b) Optimal resource allocation in industrial complexes by distributed optimization and dynamic pricing. At-Automatisierungstechnik 64(6):428–442. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0003Whang S (1995) Coordination in operat

INNODOCT/20. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education

La conferencia tiene como objetivo proporcionar un foro para académicos y profesionales que se reúnen para compartir la investigación, discutir ideas, proyectos actuales, resultados y desafíos relacionados con las Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación, Innovaciones y Metodologías aplicadas a la Educación y la Investigación.Garrigós Simón, FJ.; Estelles Miguel, S.; Lengua Lengua, I.; Narangajavana, Y. (2021). INNODOCT/20. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/161668EDITORIA

Operations planning test bed under rolling horizons, multiproduct,multiechelon, multiprocess for capacitated production planning modelling with strokes

[EN] One of the problems when conducting research in mathematical programming models for operations planning is having an adequate database of experiments that can be used to verify advances and developments with enough factors to understand different consequences. This paper presents a test bed generator and instances database for a rolling horizons analysis for multiechelon planning, multiproduct with alternatives processes, multistroke, multicapacity with different stochastic demand patterns to be used with a stroke-like bill of materials considering production costs, setup, storage and delays for operations management. From the analysis of the operations planning obtained from this test bed, it is concluded that a product structure with an alternative process obtains the lowest total cost and the highest service level. In addition, decreasing seasonal demand could present a lower total cost than constant demand, but would generate a worse service level. This test bed will allow researchers further investigation so as to verify improvements in forecast methods, rolling horizons parameters, employed software, etc.Rius-Sorolla, G.; Maheut, J.; Estelles Miguel, S.; García Sabater, JP. (2021). Operations planning test bed under rolling horizons, multiproduct,multiechelon, multiprocess for capacitated production planning modelling with strokes. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 29:1289-1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00687-5S1289131529Araujo SA, Arenales MN, Clark A (2007) Joint rolling-horizon scheduling of materials processing and lot-sizing with sequence-dependent setups. J Heuristics 13(4):337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-007-9011-9ASIC (2018) Clúster de cálculo: Rigel. http://www.upv.es/entidades/ASIC/catalogo/857893normalc.html. Accessed date 22 July 2018Baker KR (1977) An experimental study of the effectiveness of rolling schedules in production planning. Decis Sci 8(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1977.tb01065.xBarrett RT, LaForge RL (1991) A study of replanning frequencies in a material requirements planning system. Comput Oper Res 18(6):569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(91)90062-VBehnamian J, Fatemi Ghomi SMT (2014) A survey of multi-factory scheduling. J Intell Manuf 27:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0890-yBillington PJ, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (1983) Mathematical programming approaches to capacity-constrained MRP systems: review, formulation and problem reduction. Manag Sci 29(10):1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.10.1126Blackburn JD, Millen RA (1980) Heuristic lot-sizing performance in a rolling-schedule environment. Decis Sci 11(4):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01170.xCao Y (2015) Long-distance procurement planning in global sourcing. Ecole Centrale Paris. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01154871/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017Carlson RC, Beckman SL, Kropp DH (1982) The effectiveness o extending the horizon in rolling production scheduling. Decis Sci 13(1):129–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb00136.xChand S, Hsu VN, Sethi S (2002) Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: a classified bibliography. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 4(1):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.4.1.25.287Coronado-Hernández JR (2016) Análisis del efecto de algunos factores de complejidad e incertidumbre en el rendimiento de las Cadenas de Suministro. Propuesta de una herramienta de valoración basada en simulación. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (Spain). https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/61467de Sampaio RJB, Wollmann RRG, Vieira PFG (2017) A flexible production planning for rolling-horizons. Int J Prod Econ 190:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.003DeYong GD, Cattani KD (2016) Fenced in? Stochastic and deterministic planning models in a time-fenced, rolling-horizon scheduling system. Eur J Oper Res 251(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.006Federgruen A, Tzur M (1994) Minimal forecast horizons and a new planning procedure for the general dynamic lot sizing model: nervousness revisited. Oper Res 42(3):456–468. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.42.3.456Fisher ML, Ramdas K, Zheng YS (2001) Ending inventory valuation in multiperiod production scheduling. Manag Sci 47(5):679–692. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.5.679.10485Garcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JJ (2009. A capacitated material requirements planning model considering delivery constraints: a case study from the automotive industry. In: 2009 international conference on computers and industrial engineering, IEEE, pp 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIE.2009.5223806Garcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JJ (2012) A two-stage sequential planning scheme for integrated operations planning and scheduling system using MILP: the case of an engine assembler. Flex Serv Manuf J 24(2):171–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9126-zGarcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Marin-Garcia JA (2013) A new formulation technique to model materials and operations planning: the generic materials and operations planning (GMOP) problem. Eur J Ind Eng 7(2):119. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2013.052572Hair JF, Prentice E, Cano D (1999) Análisis multivariante. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverHozak K, Hill JA (2009) Issues and opportunities regarding replanning and rescheduling frequencies. Int J Prod Res 47(18):4955–4970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802047106Hsu CH, Yang HC (2017) Real-time near-optimal scheduling with rolling horizon for automatic manufacturing cell. IEEE Access 5:3369–3375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2616366Jans R (2009) Solving lot-sizing problems on parallel identical machines using symmetry-breaking constraints. Inf J Comput 21(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1080.0283Karimi B, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, Wilson JM (2003) The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms. Omega 31(5):365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00059-8Kimms A (1997) Multi-level lot sizing and scheduling, vol 53. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50162-3Kleindorfer P, Kunreuther H (1978) Stochastic horizons for the aggregate planning problem. Manag Sci 24(5):485–497. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.5.485Kumar BK, Nagaraju D, Narayanan S (2016) Supply chain coordination models: a literature review. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/86938Lalami I, Frein Y, Gayon JP (2017) Production planning in automotive powertrain plants: a case study. Int J Prod Res 55(18):5378–5393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1315192Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains 1. Sloan Manag Rev Assoc 38(3):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546Lee DU, Villasenor JD, Luk W, Leong PHW (2006) A hardware Gaussian noise generator using the box-muller method and its error analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 55(6):659–671. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2006.81Lv Y, Zhang J, Qin W (2017) A genetic regulatory network-based method for dynamic hybrid flow shop scheduling with uncertain processing times. Appl Sci 7(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7010023Maheut J (2013) Modelos y Algoritmos Basados en el Concepto Stroke para la Planificación y Programación de Operaciones con Alternativas en Redes de Suministro. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (Spain). https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/29290Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JP (2011) La matriz de operaciones y materiales y la matriz de operaciones y recursos, un nuevo enfoque para resolver el problema GMOP basado en el concepto del stroke. Direccion y Organizacion 45:46–57Maheut J, Garcia-sabater JP, Mula J (2012) A supply chain operations lot-sizing and scheduling model with alternative operations. In: Sethi SP, Bogataj M, Ros-McDonnell L (eds) Industrial engineering: innovative networks. Springer, London, pp 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2321-7Meindl B, Templ M (2012) Analysis of commercial and free and open source solvers for linear optimization problems. Common Tools and Harmonized Methodologies for SDC in the ESS, pp 1–13. http://neon.vb.cbs.nl/cascprivate/..%5Ccasc%5CESSNet2%5Cdeliverable_solverstudy.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016Meyr H (2002) Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling on parallel machines. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00373-3Narayanan A, Robinson P (2010) Evaluation of joint replenishment lot-sizing procedures in rolling horizon planning systems. Int J Prod Econ 127(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.038Nedaei H, Mahlooji H (2014) Joint multi-objective master production scheduling and rolling horizon policy analysis in make-to-order supply chains. Int J Prod Res 52(9):2767–2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.884732Newman M (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444Omar MK, Bennell JA (2009) Revising the master production schedule in a HPP framework context. Int J Prod Res 47(20):5857–5878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802130803Pérez C (2002) Estadística práctica con Statgraphics®. PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, S. A, MadridPoler R, Mula J (2011) Forecasting model selection through out-of-sample rolling horizon weighted errors. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):14778–14785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.072Prasad PSS, Krishnaiah Chetty OV (2001) Multilevel lot sizing with a genetic algorithm under fixed and rolling horizons. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(7):520–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0017010180520Rafiei R, Gaudreault J, Bouchard M, Santa-Eulalia L (2012) A reactive planning approach for demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry: a real-scale application, vol 71. CIRRELT, MontrealRafiei R, Nourelfath M, Gaudreault J, Santa-Eulalia LA, Bouchard M (2014) A periodic re-planning approach for demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry: a real-scale application. Int J Prod Res 52(14):4198–4215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.869631Ramezanian R, Fallah Sanami S, Shafiei Nikabadi M (2017) A simultaneous planning of production and scheduling operations in flexible flow shops: case study of tile industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8955-zRodriguez MA, Montagna JM, Vecchietti A, Corsano G (2017) Generalized disjunctive programming model for the multi-period production planning optimization: an application in a polyurethane foam manufacturing plant. Comput Chem Eng 103:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.03.006Sahin F, Narayanan A, Robinson EP (2013) Rolling horizon planning in supply chains: review, implications and directions for future research. Int J Prod Res 51(18):5413–5436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.775523Sethi S, Sorger G (1991) A theory of rolling horizon decision making. Ann Oper Res 29(1):387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283607Simpson NC (2001) Questioning the relative virtues of dynamic lot sizing rules. Comput Oper Res 28(9):899–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(00)00015-0Stadtler H (2000) Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single-level lot-sizing problem. Manag Sci 46(2):318–326. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.318.11924Stadtler H (2003) Multilevel lot sizing with setup times and multiple constrained resources: internally rolling schedules with lot-sizing windows. Oper Res 51(3):487–502. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.51.3.487.14949Tiacci L, Saetta S (2012) Demand forecasting, lot sizing and scheduling on a rolling horizon basis. Int J Prod Econ 140:803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.007Trigeiro WW (1987) A dual-cost heuristic for the capacitated lot sizing problem. IIE Trans 19(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408178708975371Wolsey LA (2002) Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems with an MIP solver using classification and reformulation. Manage Sci 48(12):1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.12.1587.442Xie J, Zhao X, Lee TS (2003) Freezing the master production schedule under single resource constraint and demand uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 83(1):65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00262-1Yıldırım I, Tan B, Karaesmen F (2005) A multiperiod stochastic production planning and sourcing problem with service level constraints. OR Spectrum 27(2–3):471–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0203-0Zhao X, Xie J (1998) Multilevel lot-sizing heuristics and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems. Prod Plan Control 9(4):371–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372898234109Zoller K, Robrade A (1988) Efficient heuristics for dynamic lot sizing. Int J Prod Res 26(2):249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548808947857Zulkafli NI, Kopanos GM (2017) Integrated condition-based planning of production and utility systems under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 167:776–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.15