Suatu Pendekatan Moneter terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi pada Perekonomian Terbuka Kecil dengan Kontrol Modal: Studi Kasus Indonesia 2010.1-2014.12

The purpose of this study is to formulate the monetary model of the economic growth in a small open economy (small open economy) with a free exchange rate system (flexible exchange rate system) and capital mobility is not perfect (imperfect capital mobility), as well as the factors that influence economic growth, exchange rates and interest rates with monetary approach (mathematically and empirically).This study uses a structural analysis approach to vector autoregresion with monthly data Indonesia in 2010-2014. The empirical results reveal that changes in the money supply is a significant negative effect on economic growth 0.1008 Indonesia. Moreover, economic growth is affected by the magnitude of the previous period of economic growth significantly by 0.391825, where the magnitude of the effect is determined by the strength of the exchange rate in response to changes in interest rates Indonesia, the greater the exchange rate response to changes in interest rates, the weakening influence of the period of economic growth prior to economic growth. For a small open economy (small open economy) with a free exchange rate system (flexible exchange rate system), then the value of the rupiah per dollar exchange rate is influenced significantly by the amount of money in circulation (0.063318), the exchange rate value of the last period (0.746), and the interest rate the previous period (0.3424), the interest rate two previous periods (-0.305848).For situations of capital mobility is not perfect, then the variable interest rate is treated as endogenous variables, the empirical results show that the level of BI rate significantly influenced only by the BI rate the previous month (1.4526) and the interest rate of the previous two months (0.524

Analisis Pengaruh Pendapatan Nasional Dan Tingkat Suku Bunga Terhadap Penghimpunan Dana Pihak Ketiga Pada Bank Umum Di Indonesia

The principal problem of this study are associated with the Indonesian economy which needs to be improved, therefore Government could increase through improved and increased banks performance by increasing the national income, where the banking, especially commercial banks at the core of the financial system of State. The method used in this study is multiple linear regression partial adjustment model (Partial Adjustement Model) that is useful to observe the response of short-term and long-term variable from one unit change in the value of independent variables. From the analysis results obtained equation is LSt = β0 + β1LYt + β2 Lrt + β3 LSt-1 + µt. The results showed that the model free from the classical assumption of multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation. As for all significant independent variables simultaneously on the third party funding variables, this suggests that the third party funding increase is influenced by many factors could be shown the results of the regression is calculated for 679.8788 F <F table at 2.48. And partially variable interest rate not significantly affect the third party funding. Keywords: national income, interest rates, DPK

Pengaruh Investasi, Pengeluaran Pemerintah Dan Tenaga Kerja Terhadap PDRB Kabupaten/kota Di Propinsi Banten Tahun 2010-2014

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of variable investment (domestic and foreign), Government Expenditure, Labor (Labor Force Works) for the Gross Regional Domestic Product in Banten Province. The analysis tool used regression panel data. the test results obtained deteminasi coefficient R ^ 2 for the fixed effect model of 0.9987. This showed that the ability of independent variables in explaining the dependent variable of 99.87%. The results of the research study concluded that Investment, Government Expenditures and Labor was positive and significant impact on the Gross Regional Domestic Product with the results of Statistics 3.55 F more large than F table is 2.38. While the partial test results showed that investment and government expenditure was a significant and positive effect while the labor was negative effect on the Gross Regional Domestic Product