The physical, mental, and social impact of COPD in a population-based sample:: results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with substantial health impact that may already become apparent in early disease. This study aims to examine the features of subjects with COPD in a Dutch population-based sample and compare their physical status, mental status, and social status to non-COPD subjects. This study made use of Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) data. Demographics, clinical characteristics, self-reported diseases, post-bronchodilator spirometry, physical, mental, and social status were assessed. A number of 810 subjects (50.5% male, mean age 60.5 ± 2.9 years) were included. Subjects with COPD (n = 68, mean FEV1 67.6 [IQR 60.4–80.4] %.) had a slower walking speed than non-COPD subjects, p = 0.033. When compared to non-COPD subjects, COPD subjects gave a lower rating on their health (physical subscale of SF-12: 15 [IQR 16.0–19.0] vs. 18 [IQR 11.0–17.0] points) and life (EQ5D VAS: 75 [IQR 70.0–90.0] vs. 80 points [IQR 65.0–85.5]) surveys. COPD subjects also had a more impaired disease-specific health status (CAT: 9.5 ± 5.9 vs. 6.7 ± 5.2, respectively), were less likely to have a partner (69% vs. 84%, respectively) and received emotional support less often (24% vs. 36%, respectively) compared to non-COPD subjects (All comparisons p < 0.001). In a population-based sample, subjects with COPD had a reduced physical performance, a more impaired disease-specific health status and were more socially deprived compared to non-COPD subjects. These impairments need to be taken into consideration when setting up a management program for patients with mild COPD

Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT, CCQ, and HADS in Patients With COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Prospective Analysis

Objectives: Pulmonary rehabilitation enhances health status and mood status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim was to determine the responsiveness of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), COPD Clinical Questionnaire (CCQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD, and estimate minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for CAT, CCQ, and HADS.Design: A prospective analysis. MCIDs were estimated with anchor-based (anchor: SGRQ) and distribution-based methods. Newly estimated MCIDs were compared to known MCID estimates from a systematic literature search.Setting: Newly estimated MCIDs were calculated in patients treated in pulmonary rehabilitation.Participants: A subsample of 419 individuals with COPD (55.4% male, mean age 64.3 +/- 8.8 years) were included from the Chance study.Measurements: Health status was measured with SGRQ, CAT, and CCQ, before and after pulmonary rehabilitation. Mood status was assessed using HADS.Results: 419 patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume in the first second 37.3% +/- 12.1% predicted) completed pulmonary rehabilitation. SGRQ (-9.1 +/- 14.0 points), CAT (-3.0 +/- 6.8 points), CCQ (-0.6 +/- 0.9 points), HADS-Anxiety (-1.7 +/- 3.7 points), and HADS-Depression (-2.1 +/- 3.7 points) improved significantly. New MCIDs were estimated for CAT (range: -3.8 to -1.0 points), CCQ (range: -0.8 to -0.2 points), HADS-Anxiety (range: -2.0 to -1.1 points), and HADS-Depression (range: -1.8 to -1.4 points).Conclusions: The SGRQ, CAT, CCQ, and HADS are responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. We propose MCID estimates ranging between -3.0 and -2.0 points for CAT; -0.5 and -0.3 points for CCQ, -1.8 and -1.3 points for HADS-Anxiety, and -1.7 and -1.5 points for HADS-Depression. (C) 2016 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.</p

The 2014 Updated GOLD Strategy:A Comparison of the Various Scenarios

Background: The 2014 updated Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy added the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) as the fourth possible symptoms measure. The impact of the suggested tools for symptoms of COPD and the different definitions of future risk on the frequency distribution and clinical characteristics of the GOLD groups remain unknown. Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in 542 patients with COPD (57.7% male, age 64.6 [9.0] years, FEV1 54.7 [22.3]% predicted). Health status was assessed by the COPD-specific SGRQ and symptoms of anxiety and depression by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscale. Cohen's Kappa was used to assess agreement between groups. Results: Level of agreement in frequency distribution using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea (mMRC) scale ≥2, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) ≥10, Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) ≥1 and SGRQ ≥25 was moderate to very good. Best agreement was reached between CCQ and SGRQ (К = 0.838 or 0.851, p<0.001). Patients classified in mMRC GOLD A reported higher SGRQ scores, higher HADS-A and HADS-D scores compared to patients classified in CAT GOLD A or SGRQ GOLD A. Outcomes were comparable between the risk assessment groups. Conclusions: Choice of the symptom measure impacts GOLD groups more than choice of the exacerbation risk assessment. Health care professionals should be aware that patients are heterogeneous in terms of health status and symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the symptom measure used

Redefining Cut-Points for High Symptom Burden of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification in 18,577 Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be classified into groups A/C or B/D based on symptom intensity. Different threshold values for symptom questionnaires can result in misclassification and, in turn, different treatment recommendations. The primary aim was to find the best fitting cut-points for Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) symptom measures, with an modified Medical Research Council dyspnea grade of 2 or higher as point of reference. Methods: After a computerized search, data from 41 cohorts and whose authors agreed to provide data were pooled. COPD studies were eligible for analyses if they included, at least age, sex, post-bronchodilator spirometry, modified Medical Research Council, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total scores. Main outcomes: Receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index were used to determine the best calibration threshold for CAT, COPD Clinical Questionnaire, and St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total scores. Following, GOLD A/B/C/D frequencies were calculated based on current cut-points and the newly derived cut-points. Findings: A total of 18,577 patients with COPD [72.0% male; mean age: 66.3 years (standard deviation 9.6)] were analyzed. Most patients had a moderate or severe degree of airflow limitation (GOLD spirometric grade 1, 10.9%; grade 2, 46.6%; grade 3, 32.4%; and grade 4, 10.3%). The best calibration threshold for CAT total score was 18 points, for COPD Clinical Questionnaire total score 1.9 points, and for St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score 46.0 points. Conclusions: The application of these new cut-points would reclassify about one-third of the patients with COPD and, thus, would impact on individual disease management. Further validation in prospective studies of these new values are needed. (C) 2017 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine