Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults.

The management reporting and assessment of glycemic control lacks standardization. The use of different methods to measure the blood glucose concentration and to report the performance of insulin treatment yields major disparities and complicates the interpretation and comparison of clinical trials. We convened a meeting of 16 experts plus invited observers from industry to discuss and where possible reach consensus on the most appropriate methods to measure and monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients and on how glycemic control should be assessed and reported. Where consensus could not be reached, recommendations on further research and data needed to reach consensus in the future were suggested. Recognizing their clear conflict of interest, industry observers played no role in developing the consensus or recommendations from the meeting. Consensus recommendations were agreed for the measurement and reporting of glycemic control in clinical trials and for the measurement of blood glucose in clinical practice. Recommendations covered the following areas: How should we measure and report glucose control when intermittent blood glucose measurements are used? What are the appropriate performance standards for intermittent blood glucose monitors in the ICU? Continuous or automated intermittent glucose monitoring - methods and technology: can we use the same measures for assessment of glucose control with continuous and intermittent monitoring? What is acceptable performance for continuous glucose monitoring systems? If implemented, these recommendations have the potential to minimize the discrepancies in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials and to improve glucose control in clinical practice. Furthermore, to be fit for use, glucose meters and continuous monitoring systems must match their performance to fit the needs of patients and clinicians in the intensive care setting

Comparison of usefulness of C-reactive protein versus white blood cell count to predict outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction

White blood cell (WBC) count and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are both used as markers of inflammation and prognosis after an ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but it is unknown whether they have independent prognostic value. We investigated the association and independent prognostic importance of WBC and hs-CRP after STEMI. In this subanalysis of the On-TIME trial, in 490 of 507 (97%) patients, either WBC count or CRP,and in 362 (71%) patients, both WBC count and CRP, were measured on admission before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no significant correlation between WBC count and CRP (R = 0.080). Higher levels of CRP were associated with a reinfarction or death within 1 year (mean hs-CRP 14.2 +/- 20.4 vs 6.1 +/- 14.2, p = 0.006), but CRP was not associated with enzymatic infarct size (lactate dehydrogenase, LDHQ48) or left ventricular ejection fraction. A higher baseline WBC count was associated with larger LDHQ48 and lower left ventricular ejection fraction but not with 1-year reinfarction or death. In conclusion, although both WBC count and CRP are markers of inflammation and predictors of outcome after STEMI, we did not find a correlation between baseline WBC count and CRP levels in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. The mechanisms by which WBC counts predict outcome were related to myocardial infarct size whereas CRP were not. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

In-Hospital Healthcare Utilization, Outcomes, and Costs in Pre-Hospital-Adjudicated Low-Risk Chest-Pain Patients

Background There is increasing evidence that in patients presenting with acute chest pain, pre-hospital triage can accurately identify low-risk patients. It is, however, still unclear which diagnostics are performed in pre-hospital-adjudicated low-risk patients and what the contribution is of those diagnostic results in the healthcare process. Objectives The aim of this study was to quantify healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes in pre-hospital-adjudicated low-risk chest-pain patients, and to extrapolate to total costs in the Netherlands. Methods This was a prospective cohort study including 700 patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in which pre-hospital risk stratification using the HEART score was performed by paramedics. Low risk was defined as a pre-hospital HEART scor

Predictors of elevated cardiac troponin T on admission in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background In patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), elevated cardiac troponin T (cTnT) on admission is associated with poorer outcomes despite early reperfusion. Presentation delay is thought to be the most important factor for the elevation of cTnT on admission. We evaluated presentation delay and other potential predictors of elevated cTnT on admission in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for STEMI. Methods CTnT was measured upon arrival in the PCI centre in 444 patients with acute STEMI. An elevated cTnT was defined as >0.05 mu g/L. Results The mean age was 61.7 years and patients were admitted at a median of 155 min after symptom onset. Almost 50% had an elevated cTnT on admission. Patients with a positive cTnT on admission were less likely to have successful primary PCI (87 versus 93%, P = 0.048) and had significantly higher rates of one-year mortality (4.9 versus 1.3%, P = 0.031). There was a significant association between presentation delay and the prevalence of elevated admission cTnT, but even patients with early presentation ( Conclusion In patients with STEMI, the prevalence of elevated cTnT on admission is high, even in patients with early presentation. Independent predictors of elevated cTnT on admission are presentation delay, increasing age and anterior MI location

Predictors of elevated cardiac troponin T on admission in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background In patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), elevated cardiac troponin T (cTnT) on admission is associated with poorer outcomes despite early reperfusion. Presentation delay is thought to be the most important factor for the elevation of cTnT on admission. We evaluated presentation delay and other potential predictors of elevated cTnT on admission in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for STEMI.Methods CTnT was measured upon arrival in the PCI centre in 444 patients with acute STEMI. An elevated cTnT was defined as &gt;0.05 mu g/L.Results The mean age was 61.7 years and patients were admitted at a median of 155 min after symptom onset. Almost 50% had an elevated cTnT on admission. Patients with a positive cTnT on admission were less likely to have successful primary PCI (87 versus 93%, P = 0.048) and had significantly higher rates of one-year mortality (4.9 versus 1.3%, P = 0.031). There was a significant association between presentation delay and the prevalence of elevated admission cTnT, but even patients with early presentation (Conclusion In patients with STEMI, the prevalence of elevated cTnT on admission is high, even in patients with early presentation. Independent predictors of elevated cTnT on admission are presentation delay, increasing age and anterior MI location.</p

Consequences of different cut-off values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for risk stratification of patients suspected for NSTE-ACS with a modified HEART score

Aim: This study aims to enhance prehospital risk assessment for suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients using the HEART-score. By incorporating novel point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin devices, a modified HEART-score was developed and compared with the conventional approach. Patients &amp; methods: Troponin points within the modified HEART-score are based on values below the limit of quantitation (LoQ), between the LoQ and 99th percentile and above the 99th percentile of the used device. A total HEART-score of three or lower is considered low-risk for major adverse cardiac events. Results &amp; conclusion: The number of low-risk patients decreased based on the modified HEART-score. The sensitivity and negative predictive value increased which suggests increasing safety in ruling out patients with suspected NSTE-ACS

Prognostic Value of Admission Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Glucose in Nondiabetic Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background-In nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, acute hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcome. Whether this association is due merely to hyperglycemia as an acute stress response or whether longer-term glycometabolic derangements are also involved is uncertain. It was our aim to determine the association between both acute and chronic hyperglycemia (hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)]) and outcome in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-This observational study included consecutive patients (n=4176) without known diabetes mellitus admitted with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. All patients were treated with primary percutaneous intervention. Both glucose and HbA(1c) were measured on admission. Main outcome measure was total long-term mortality; secondary outcome measures were 1-year mortality and enzymatic infarct size. One-year mortality was 4.7%, and mortality after total follow-up (3.3 +/- 1.5 years) was 10%. Both elevated HbA(1c) levels (P Conclusions-In nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, both elevated admission glucose and HbA(1c) levels were associated with adverse outcome. Both of these parameters reflect different patient populations, and their association with outcome is probably due to different mechanisms. Measurement of both parameters enables identification of these high-risk groups for aggressive secondary risk prevention. (Circulation. 2011; 124: 704-711.

Impact of elevated HbA1c on long-term mortality in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction in daily clinical practice:insights from a 'real world' prospective registry of the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical outcome is less well known in up to presentation persons unknown with diabetes mellitus who present with acute myocardial infarction and elevated glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels on admission. We aimed to study the prognostic impact of deranged HbA1c at presentation on long-term mortality in patients not known with diabetes, presenting with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: A single-centre, large, prospective observational study in patients with and without known diabetes admitted to our hospital for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI. Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus was defined as HbA1c of 48 mmol/l or greater and pre-diabetes mellitus was defined as HbA1c between 39 and 47 mmol/l. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at short (30 days) and long-term (median 52 months) follow-up. RESULTS: Out of 7900 acute myocardial infarction patients studied, 1314 patients (17%) were known diabetes patients. Of the 6586 patients without known diabetes, 3977 (60%) had no diabetes, 2259 (34%) had pre-diabetes and 350 (5%) had newly diagnosed diabetes based on HbA1c on admission. Both short-term (3.9% vs. 7.4% vs. 6.0%, p<0.001) and long-term mortality (19% vs. 26% vs. 35%, p<0.001) for both pre-diabetes patients as well as newly diagnosed diabetes patients was poor and comparable to known diabetes patients. After multivariate analysis, newly diagnosed diabetes was independently associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.27-2.34, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date, newly diagnosed or pre-diabetes was present in 33% of acute myocardial infarction patients and was associated with poor long-term clinical outcome. Newly diagnosed diabetes (HbA1c ⩾48 mmol/mol) is an independent predictor of long-term mortality. More attention to early detection of diabetic status and initiation of blood glucose-lowering treatment is necessary